Channel
@logachevacosmetics
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,248subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001634153307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @logachevacosmetics |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/logachevacosmetics |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 5,248 | -24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 5,272 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 5,285 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 5,297 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 5,305 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 5,310 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 5,315 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 5,320 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 5,319 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 5,339 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 5,345 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 5,346 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 5,348 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 5,348 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
452 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 297 | 65.7% | |
| 🔥 | 79 | 17.5% | |
| 🐳 | 20 | 4.42% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 2.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 2.21% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.21% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 1.99% | |
| 🦄 | 9 | 1.99% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.885% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.221% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На моей улице опять перевернулся грузовик с ничейными коробками, а я персона любопытная - взяла да заглянула, а там такие сокровища! Ну я и утащила всё домой, в хозяйстве пригодится: Новенький для меня российский бренд косметики Olesya Dikaya, и гляньте, какая удача - сыворотка от отёчности, пептиды меди, крем как под мою кожу делали... ⭐️С отёчностью в сыворотке борется наш любимый комплекс активов (пептиды Dipepti…
❤36🔥7🤩5
2 непохожих друг на друга крема, которые об одном и том же: сияние и осветление от Purcell и Angiopharm. 🧡Я безумно рада, что Ангио взялся актуализировать уход для пятнистых рож кож: крем с транексамовой кислотой даже близко не вошёл в мои фавориты, хотя актив этот, как вы знаете, я нежно люблю. Виновата, в основном, текстура: делали явно для возрастной или себодефицитной, а я не и пока что не другое. Radiance же ли…
❤43❤🔥6🐳4🍓3
Если вам не хватало какой-то полезной штуки в уходе, которая ещё бы вызвала слюноотделение - напоминаю, что средства с феруловой кислотой имеют разный уровень "копчённости" аромата, потому что актив с сюрпризом. Впрочем, это не должно быть доводом для принятия решения о покупке или отказа от неё - упаси боже, когда речь идёт об очень дружелюбном тонике с кислотами Aiva. Отвратительно долго не доходили руки до него, …
❤33🔥18🤓4😘1
Воскресный вечерний обзор - про изрядно поднакопившиеся волосяные банки. Единственное, чем мне не нравится короткая стрижка - она жутко требовательная: если не укладываться, будешь выглядеть как китайская хохлатая, на которую сели, зато шикарно видно работу масок. ⭐️SPARK' & GLOW with keratin effect Мощная, густая маска с маслами для возвращения к жизни абсолютно убитых волос. Экономичная, но для натурального волоса…
❤26🔥12🐳4🍓1🥰1🦄1
Моё увлечение парфюмами, к радости кошелька и всех домашних, перешло в фазу «закончилось место на полке, теперь просто нюхаем и изучаем». Новые флаконы мне пока не нужны (вылить бы на себя старые), но это не значит, что я прекратила качать парфюмерную насмотренность - тем более я ещё не все бутиковые Гелены вынюхала. Кстати о них: Eau de Lingerie - 4й аромат в коллекции, посвящённой материям, выпущенной в этом году,…
❤22🔥8🥰5🦄4🍓1🐳1
Запуск, который я ни за что бы не пропустила, даже если бы находилась на дне Марианской впадины - Openface расширили свою линейку дезиков! Первый кислотный вариант я нахваливала не раз и не два, а сколько банок за свой счёт куплено/потрачено - просто не счесть. В какой-то момент, правда, я всё равно перешла на заморский Saltair, но новинки вынудили меня вернуться обратно. 🖥Что новенького: Усиленный Super Sweet Not…
❤35🔥17🐳3🍓1🥰1🦄1
Alarm дня: у мандаринок можно приобрести обожаемый многими (и мной в частности) Reviderm с приличной скидкой - 10% на сайте + скидка по нашему промокоду vanskin10! Давно не было такой щедрости, надо ловить момент, я считаю. Какие средства были не раз мной расхвалены, рекомендованы на консультациях и израсходованы в 0? Разумеется, крем-легенда de stress: любой раздраженной коже, при розацеа, акне, на терапии ретинои…
❤22🔥10❤🔥2🍓1🥰1🦄1
Воскресные вечерние #небыстрыеобзоры - спасибо этим выходным за то, что я отдохнула и чуть разгрузила мозг, чтобы поделиться с вами банками, которые я от души натестила недавно: Aminu Copper Peptide Serum Давно хотела попробовать эту медь и вот, совершилось: на beauty bazar day со мной поделились миниатюрой. Состав у сыворотки интересный c точки зрения anti age - помимо самого медного пептида и полного набора увлажн…
❤35🔥7🐳3❤🔥1🍓1🥰1🦄1
Давно у меня не падал глаз на новинки зарубежных брендов, а на прошедшей неделе вышли сразу 2 любопытные сыворотки: Remedy Skin Cooper Peptide Complex Advanced Firming Serum В коллекции медных заграничных сывороток прибыло - сочетание 1% пептида с эктоином, аргирелином и Palmitoyl Tripeptide-5 Полный состав: Water, Pentylene Glycol, Isopentyliol, 1,2-Hexanediol, Glycerin, Ectoin, Copper Tripeptide-1, Polyglutamic…
❤45🤩8🐳5❤🔥1🍓1🥰1🦄1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @logachevacosmetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В мире сывороток|Vanskin” (@logachevacosmetics), 5,248 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logachevacosmetics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.