Вот такую красотень нашла по ссылке из прошлого поста. Ну и чё, карточка, снова будем худеть?) Куртка-пиджак Джинсы с кружевом Кольцо круглое Кольцо прямоугольное Туфли пушистые Блузка с корсетом Сапоги Барби
❤10🔥8💅3

Channel
@sumochka_bye_bye
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,040subscribers
-466 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001681771078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sumochka_bye_bye |
| Description | Я Рамина, и моё главное правило: чтобы быть заряженной, нужно быть наряженной. Пишу про нарядцы и банки. Так что готовьте ваши сумочки с денежками @raminasy Регистрация в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/68e52c61b6c2befa35cb76b4 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sumochka_bye_bye |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 21:04 | 10,040 | -9 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 10,049 | +1 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:07 | 10,048 | +7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:48 | 10,041 | +10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:35 | 10,031 | +7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:39 | 10,024 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:45 | 10,030 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:26 | 10,029 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 10,037 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:49 | 10,043 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:08 | 10,060 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:29 | 10,063 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:38 | 10,065 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 10,068 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 10,076 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 10,080 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:47 | 10,083 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 10,088 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 10,094 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 10,097 | first reading |
90 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 90 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,011 |
| Reactions total | 1,789 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 23:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,335 reactions across 81 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,753 | 51.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,348 | 25.3% | |
| 💅 | 660 | 12.4% | |
| 💯 | 131 | 2.46% | |
| 😁 | 111 | 2.08% | |
| 🍓 | 106 | 1.99% | |
| 🍾 | 47 | 0.881% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 0.769% | |
| 🤪 | 28 | 0.525% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 0.394% | |
| 🤩 | 18 | 0.337% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 0.337% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.262% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 0.244% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 0.225% | |
| custom 5262554476383858158 | 6 | 0.112% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 0.112% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.037% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (9.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вот такую красотень нашла по ссылке из прошлого поста. Ну и чё, карточка, снова будем худеть?) Куртка-пиджак Джинсы с кружевом Кольцо круглое Кольцо прямоугольное Туфли пушистые Блузка с корсетом Сапоги Барби
❤10🔥8💅3
Знаете вот этот моментус, когда твоя лента на маркетплейсе похожа на Pinterest? Всё очень вау, даже копаться и выбирать не нужно. Заказываешь — и думаешь: «это чё теперь всю корзину выкупать??». Вот я знаю, как так сделать. Раз: открываем эту подборку брендов с ВБ. Два: тыкаем на каждый, выбираем что-то классное в избранное и в корзину. Три: ваша лента великолепна 💖 Буквально мой план на вечер
❤31🔥23💅22
Приспичило мне купить косметичку. Но чтоб лезла во все сумки. Вы вообще знали, что это примерно как искать туфли на шпильке 34 размера? Задачка со звездой во лбу. Огромные косметички, в которых можно вынести весь мой скарб — извольте. Миниатюрные — ага, щас. Нашла эту красотулю, но в некоторые сумки кладу, согнув с одной стороны. О — оптимизация. Что обычно внутри: — писят карандашей — помада, бальзам — резинка — …
❤30🔥13
Открыта вакансия девушки, которой просто так достанутся 10 000 ₽ на красивое бельё Требования к кандидату: — любить красивые трусики — верить в подарки от вселенной Условия: — работать не нужно — начальника нет — премия 10 000 ₽ на бельё от JUNA Intimates Собеседование не проводим, победительницу выберем случайно 13 ноября. Ещё одной счастливице подарим набор трусиков Отклики принимаются в закреплённом посте!
😁20❤18💅5🔥1
Работа сегодня не щадила настолько, что хочется наклеить себе стикер-сердечко на лицо от сглазу… лечь в пиццу и разлагаться. Также я в отпуске: — надо ходить в зал три раза в неделю вместо двух — закажу алмазную мозаику 30х40 — заведу второй канал про находки вкусней и рецепты — шкаф разобрать бы на неделе — буду ходить в баню хотя бы два раза в месяц — надо к родителям чаще выбирать — навайбкодить штуку — не матер…
💅58❤13🔥3👍2
Сигаретная эстетика в аксессуарах — не тренд времени. Всё началось полвека назад с… сумочек. ➡️ Как к этому причастны Ив Сен Лоран и Том Форд, когда сигаретный тренд вернулся на подиумы и где такое великолепие можно купить
💅16❤15🔥11⚡3🤩1
Украшения курильщика Уровень стиля — плюс бесконечность. Кейс для сигареты Кольцо-зажигалка Окурок золотой Кейс для стиков Окурок серебряный
❤19🔥6😁5💅2
Сумочный дайджест: что интересного вышло за последние две недели Конкурс! 10к на покупку белья ✔️ Инспирейшн Комбо колготок Как носить цветные колготки Асимметричный пиджак из обычного Каффы для внутренней части уха Аксессуары для волосы ✔️ Находки Народные лайфхаки по сохранению колготочного фонда Минималистичные кольца Гранд-кольцо Цветные шоперы Где купить сумку Российский бренд белья Обзор Juna Intimates Мягки…
❤22🔥5💅2🤩2
Солнце на каждый день выглядит так: Манго Йогурт Семена чиа Голубика Мед Сахарозаменитель Овсянка И еще более 10 рецептов из манго! Это мы сохраняем!
🔥32❤17💅13
Затестила новую очищающую маску Laboratorium очено уважаю за жёлтую увлажняющую маску, решила рискнуть с очищающей. Хотя глину не люблю из-за ощущения каменного лица. Тут маска прям жидкая, долго не застывает. Смывала через 20 минут без сильной стянутости. Намочила салфетку из прошлого поста, протёрла лицо и всё. Прошлась петлёй уно, вытащила чёрные точечки на носу. Результат нравится. Кожа заполированная, поры уз…
❤29😁8💅4
Нашла замену любимым одноразовым полотенцам Papuk Beauty — и в 2 раза дешевле. Сами полотенца как будто такие же. Очень их люблю за то, что после лица я ими протираю все поверхности в ванной. Клининг-бонус!
❤39🔥13💅4👍1
Ляньте на эту нежную льдинку. Вы бы видели, как красиво смотрится на коже… Этот кайфучий комплект из сетки и кружева от JUNA Intimates. В лифе есть косточки, но они какие-то необычные — не вминаются в рёбра, а аккуратно поддерживают. Сама сетка очень комфортная, ничего не колется и не впивается. Трусики бразильяна, попэо в них космическое! JUNA дарит сертификат на 10 000 ₽, залетайте в конкурс!
❤46💅16🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @sumochka_bye_bye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сумочка, мы уходим!” (@sumochka_bye_bye), 10,040 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sumochka_bye_bye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.