Posted without readable text
😍17custom 537548434501011068712custom 540017444984246640311custom 53755511532264012555❤🔥3💘3😘3custom 52651585923648233663

Channel
@skidka_wow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,139subscribers
-1,178 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001698225140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @skidka_wow |
| Description | Пишу про крутые бьюти-продукты и нахожу их по лучшим ценам Я Юля, приятно познакомиться ❤️ 📩 сотрудничество: @juli_honina Менеджер: @Marina_Nik45 РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6737bde0772bb113f529deba |
| Created | 23 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/skidka_wow |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 34,139 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:49 | 34,150 | -28 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 34,178 | -25 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:51 | 34,203 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 34,234 | -41 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 34,275 | -29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:34 | 34,304 | -37 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:27 | 34,341 | -29 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 34,370 | -27 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 34,397 | -11 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 34,408 | -34 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:07 | 34,442 | -83 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 34,525 | -187 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 34,712 | +34 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 34,678 | +414 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 34,264 | -191 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 34,455 | -35 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 34,490 | +219 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 34,271 | -43 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 34,314 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 150 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (27 July 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 150,430 |
| Reactions total | 2,711 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 15:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,182 reactions across 71 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 1,657 | 32.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 903 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5375551153226401255 | 590 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5375484345010110687 | 508 | 9.80% | |
| custom 5400174449842466403 | 477 | 9.20% | |
| custom 5300864949009010774 | 322 | 6.21% | |
| 👏 | 241 | 4.65% | |
| 💋 | 103 | 1.99% | |
| 🤩 | 96 | 1.85% | |
| 💘 | 73 | 1.41% | |
| 💯 | 46 | 0.888% | |
| 🥰 | 41 | 0.791% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 0.425% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 0.425% | |
| 🏆 | 19 | 0.367% | |
| custom 5265158592364823366 | 17 | 0.328% | |
| custom 5465497492210609366 | 14 | 0.27% | |
| 😘 | 13 | 0.251% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 0.193% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.096% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.058% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjbuTBTq | 1 | 27 July 2026 | 27 July 2026 |
| 2SDnjcogKHD | 1 | 21 September 2026 | 21 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjdN9eSX | 1 | 21 September 2026 | 21 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjdfsm1m | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeAJHR5 | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
| 2SDnjeSZpts | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
| 2SDnjepHVxP | 1 | 17 October 2026 | 17 October 2026 |
| 2SDnjewzk3e | 1 | 25 October 2026 | 25 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
⚡️💄 сертификат на 2000₽ в Золотое Яблоко для всех 1. Оформляем бесплатную дебетовую карту ОТП банка по этой акционной ссылке до конца октября 2. Совершаем любую покупку от 100₽ до конца ноября 3. Получаем карту курьерской доставкой Сертификат на 2000₽ придет в смс сообщении до 31.01.27 *Акция для клиентов, у которых нет дебетовой карты ОТП Банка или она закрыта более 180 дней назад. Доп инфу оставлю в комментах,…
custom 537548434501011068728❤🔥14😍6⚡4💋3custom 53755511532264012553custom 54001744498424664032
Posted without readable text
😍17custom 537548434501011068712custom 540017444984246640311custom 53755511532264012555❤🔥3💘3😘3custom 52651585923648233663
Собрала подборку ароматов Louis Vuitton, которые меня впечатлили — это эталоны настоящего парфюма, роскошные, уникальные и ни на что не похожие 💔 • Imagination • Symphony • Moon Tale • Attrape - Reves • аромабокс со всеми популярными ароматами Что меня особенно восхищает в Louis Vuitton — насколько гармонично звучат ароматы. Ни одна нота не выбивается, нет ощущения резкой химозности. Даже самые нежные композиции об…
😍18❤🔥12custom 537555115322640125510custom 53754843450101106873custom 53008649490090107742custom 54001744498424664032🤩1
Обзор на топовые средства для зубов EMRA в моей ванной ❤️ • зубную пасту купила сразу после пенки «вишня-кола», вкус ооочень приятный вишневый, состав направлен на правильное очищение, предотвращение кариеса и снижение чувствительности зубов • пенка для зубов со вкусом спелой вишни и колы - настолько понравилась, что с мая перестала пробовать новые вкусы и покупаю только её! Кстати, вкусов у пенок реально много. Я …
😍21custom 540017444984246640314custom 53755511532264012556custom 53754843450101106875custom 53008649490090107744💋2❤🔥1🔥1
Уважаемые знатоки, что у меня в руках? ЭТО НЕ ПИВО 😂 Той, кто первой угадает, закажу и подарю эту прелесть сегодня 🧡🥰
custom 540017444984246640330🤩11❤🔥6👏5😍4custom 53754843450101106874custom 53755511532264012554💋3
Повторила мягкий гель для умывания Bhab — да, девочки, настолько он хорош 🤍 Это идеальная мягкая умывашка для ежедневного использования любого типа и состояния кожи: супер мягкая, очень деликатная, но эффективно очищающая. Из спецэффектов, она вообще не сушит кожу, а увлажняет и успокаивает, при этом, заметно уменьшение жирности Т-зоны и осветление сальных нитей (это те самые «черные точки») Физиологичный pH и отс…
custom 537555115322640125527😍9❤🔥6🤩5👏2🙏2🔥1custom 54001744498424664031
На ART\FACT срабатывает скидка 20% от любых сумм 🩵 промокод: TB8E20F41E7F копируется нажатием , дает доп скидку 20% на весь бренд ART\FACT на Ozon от любой суммы до 31.10
👏27❤🔥11😍9custom 53755511532264012555custom 53754843450101106874custom 54001744498424664032
Лету подарил всем бонусы на разные суммы, проверяйте в личном кабинете, сколько у вас Мне начислили аж 7500 😎
👏27😍11custom 53755511532264012557🔥6💘2🤩2custom 54001744498424664032💋1
Мооооре классных новых наборов появилось на USmall 🥳 ⚡️🧡🌪️лучшие цены дает многоразовый промокод: ВАУ Еще 500₽ на первый заказ от любой суммы на Usmall забирайте здесь🐭
custom 537548434501011068724custom 537555115322640125510❤🔥8😍8👏2🔥2custom 54001744498424664032
Это знак, что пора посмотреть свое избранное в РИВ ГОШ 🫰🏼 Там -45% по промокоду: ЗНАК при корзине от 8000₽ на Clarins, Loccitane, Erborian, Carolina Herrera, Round Lab, La Sultane, Elemis, Janeke, Celimax и тд
😍26🔥10custom 53755511532264012559❤🔥4💋3👏2custom 53754843450101106872custom 52651585923648233661
Находка для тех, кто не любит тратить много времени на антивозрастной уход, но любит получать качественный результат 🤍 — это компактный антивозрастной стик для лица и шеи от GELTEK, и вы готовы к этому наслаждению: • что делает стик: интенсивно увлажняет, убирает сухость и шелушения, повышает упругость и эластичность кожи, сокращает видимость мелких морщин. С ним быстро получаю сияющую кожу без намека на липкость …
custom 537555115322640125531😍10💯7❤🔥5custom 53754843450101106875custom 54001744498424664032
Мой очень быстрый (но очень качественный) вечерний уход 🩵 - увлажняющий мист Arocell в легчайшей водичковой текстуре - антивозрастной пептидный стик GELTEK для глаз, лица и шеи Кожа увлажнена, напитана и сияет без липкости, еще и на anti-age хорошо поработали. Любовь!
custom 530086494900901077446custom 540017444984246640311👏7😍6custom 53754843450101106873😘2custom 52651585923648233661
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @skidka_wow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“фрисби” (@skidka_wow), 34,139 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skidka_wow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.