Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝

@sem_skin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,635subscribers

+133 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661488996
TypeChannel
Username@sem_skin
DescriptionЗаявление в РКН № 5564577137 Оксана — фанат серого вещества, диагноз — бьютиголизм. Сотрудничество, реклама (СО ССЫЛКАМИ) менеджер Виктория @kitok_bratok ВК: https://vk.ru/sem_skin 🍄 В анамнезе малассезия фолликулит
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sem_skin

Growth

12,50212,63512,568.57 August 2026 — 12,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,502 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,572 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,611 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,635 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 8 days, net +133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,482–12,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:1612,635+24
13 Aug 2026, 13:5812,611+19
12 Aug 2026, 15:5812,592+9
9 Aug 2026, 16:0412,583+11
8 Aug 2026, 13:4012,572+70
7 Aug 2026, 08:3012,502no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2912,502first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 12,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held24 (27 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total54,210
Reactions total3,817
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,630
Videos
292
Links
1,040

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,817 reactions across 24 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,44237.8%
🔥1,03427.1%
❤‍🔥97925.6%
1122.93%
💯972.54%
💘350.917%
🤝330.865%
🐳320.838%
🙏210.55%
🍓190.498%
👏100.262%
🏆30.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,817reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 24 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sem_skin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈1,300 views105 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Подруги, которых вы постоянно снабжаете косметикой, — самые благодарные люди на свете, чесслово. За увесистый пакет, доверху набитый банками, она станет кем угодно: и кабачковым дилером, и личным водителем, и фокус-группой для тестирования любых средств, которые, увы, тебе не подходят. Вот, например, эта лимфодренажная новинка Ice Drainage Mask от всеми любимого бренда PORODA собрана идеально. Но мне, к сожалению, е

🤣55❤‍🔥36🔥10💯4

14 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,390 views120 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Женщины — существа довольно хитрые и адаптивные. Они практически мгновенно подстраиваются под ситуацию и очень убедительно изображают, что всё идёт именно так, как было задумано. Где нам нужно — добавим томный взгляд, восторженные придыхания или дрожащие коленки с шёпотом «господи, это было невероятно». Я почти уверена, что симуляция оргазма — это необходимый навык для нашего с вами выживания. Ну а как ещё то? На с

🤣89💯19❤‍🔥9🍓3

13 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,950 views119 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

У Вадима Зеланда (всем известный духовный наставник халявщиков) есть техника управления реальностью, которая называется «Коса намерения». Техника достаточно сложная, рассчитанная на людей с шизофренией богатой фантазией: вам всего лишь необходимо представить фантомную косу у себя за спиной. Затем волевым усилием зажечь на конце этой астральной косы воображаемую лампочку. А дальше вывести перед собой некий экран с ц

🔥69🤣47❤‍🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,830 views123 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Некоторые воспоминания из детства невозможно стереть из памяти, как бы ты ни старался. Как щас помню тот день в детском садике, когда я доверила самое ценное, что у меня было, своей лучшей подружке Наташке — охранять мою запеканку со сгущенкой, пока я на всех парах лечу до горшка. Прибегаю, значит, обратно, а эта гадина доедает последний кусок с моей тарелки, весь рот в сгущенке, сидит такая, глазами хлопает... До н

🤣91❤‍🔥26🍓6

12 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,040 views126 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте, а как Вам бензоил пероксид от марини? Как, как... Да вот так, что я сейчас должна каким-то образом обосновать ценник в пять тыщ и не захлебнуться скупердяйскими слезами 🤍 Ладно, рассказываю. Рылась в отделе новинок у Миюшопов, смотрю — стоит он, люксовый бензоилпероксид MARINI SKINSOLUTIONS, да ещё и 5%. Открываю состав. А там на меня сразу же вываливается заманчивая информация об ультрамикронизирован

❤‍🔥83🔥36🤝4👏3

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,960 views169 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Дамы и господа, впервые в истории бьюти-индустрии, уникальное, не побоюсь этого слова — эпохальное событие! Сегодня в нашем блоге главный эксперт всея Телеграма, смотритель составов, укротитель активов и просто человек, чьи регалии не поместятся ни на одном сертификате. Встречайте! Трехкратный победитель ночного международного турнира по закидыванию недалёких сочатовцев ссылками на Пабмед; чемпион мира по чтению со

🤣150🔥10🙏5🐳4

11 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,060 views165 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

У мужика было ведро слив. Каждый день он перебирал их и съедал те, которые начинали портиться. В итоге он съел ведро гнилых слив. У блогера был шкаф косметики. Каждый день он собирался выбрать оттуда самое лучшее, но сначала тестировал банку, которую просил показать бренд, или очередную новинку, потому что «надо всех обогнать». В итоге те самые лучшие, рабочие банки сгнили, как сливы у мужика. Мои лучшие банки нико

❤‍🔥12820🔥8💘6🤣3

10 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,420 views173 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

DE_CODE, конечно, очень старается быть молодёжным: на постерах дети, у активов игривые персонажи, на ярких упаковках — увлекательные рассказы с иллюстрациями. В общем, вайб такой, будто сейчас откроется окно и какой-то пацан крикнет: «Серёжа выйдет? Нет? А пусть скинет энзимку». Серёжа не скинет. Я её не отдам. Извините, товарищи зумеры, но я, 38-летняя тётя, тоже не хочу страдать от прыщей. Мало того, я, как блоге

❤‍🔥106🤣38🔥27🍓2

10 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,940 views246 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Слушайте, как всё-таки классно, что у меня есть прыщи. Господи, как же я их люблю. Без них я была бы обычной женщиной, купила бы рандомный крем, намазалась и пошла на работу. Ни сравнительных испытаний, ни расследований — тоска смертная. А благодаря прыщам у меня дома есть небольшая сборная по уничтожению рогового слоя: три адапалена, два третиноина и несколько бензоилпероксидов разной концентрации и ценовой категор

🤣188🤝29🔥25❤‍🔥4

7 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,750 views246 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⭐️КОНКУРС ДЛЯ САМЫХ ЭРУДИРОВАННЫХ⭐️ Мы с коллегами из экспертных каналов: Оксаной, Евгенией и Олесей решили разыграть три крутых бьюти-бокса — но не среди кого попало, а исключительно среди интеллектуальной элиты 💅 Сразу предупреждаем: отбор будет жесточайший. Потребуется широкий кругозор, выдающиеся аналитические способности и сложнейший навык, который не каждому дан: вам нужно будет НАЖАТЬ НА КНОПКУ УЧАСТВОВАТЬ.

❤‍🔥146🔥54💘27🤣11🍓4🙏4

Signed RandomGodBot⚡️ [Рандомайзер]

7 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈2,520 views170 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у нас очередное #слово_дня, которое вы точно видели в составах, но, скорее всего, не обращали внимание на эту химическую хтонь. Зачем-то оно там есть, но кто бы знал, что оно делает. Конечно же, это слово: ЭМУЛЬГАТОР. Созвучно со словом ХЕЛАТОР, не правда ли? Если вы думаете, что у косметических химиков нет фантазии на названия, то тут я соглашусь 🤝 Я бы назвала его «ПОГРАНИЧНИКОМ». Всё потому, что его моле

🔥119❤‍🔥25🐳157🤣4

7 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,130 views194 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Вы наверное знаете, что женщинам приписывают большую эмоциональность, хотя это миф, выстроенный годами на социальных стереотипах. В средневековье эмоциональность и вспыльчивость была свойственна только мужчинам: он рыдал, падал на колени, умирая от любви, бился за даму или орал на слуг. Женщина в это время должна была сохранять лицо с непробиваемым спокойствием. Пока муж валялся поперек лестницы, крича, что его жизн

🤣142🔥34🙏126

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @sem_skin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,348 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Амина
@dr_amina_pirmanova · 130,774
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝” (@sem_skin), 12,635 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sem_skin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.