Владилена. бьюти криэйторка и муза.
по вопросам рекламы: @wladil3na и @wintercherry9
(присылайте сразу ссылки!!)
буст канала: https://t.me/boost/pray4barbiee
РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/673d8b4a9d804a279bc79afd
Created
Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,120–11,201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 03:34
11,129
-7
12 Aug 2026, 06:52
11,136
-12
11 Aug 2026, 08:13
11,148
-14
10 Aug 2026, 08:12
11,162
-9
9 Aug 2026, 08:32
11,171
-6
8 Aug 2026, 11:32
11,177
-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:41
11,190
-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:31
11,192
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.63%
avg views ÷ 11,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
22 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
23,584
Reactions total
2,175
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,220
Videos
≈265
Links
≈576
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,175 reactions across 22 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5434074373306723076
653
30.0%
custom 5233605456210977245
344
15.8%
custom 5222483324865372101
171
7.86%
custom 5400322072163395142
163
7.49%
custom 5355174247826217637
120
5.52%
custom 5436302825678185046
113
5.20%
custom 5436397164634864548
64
2.94%
custom 5310076562937226844
55
2.53%
custom 5309908715615298924
54
2.48%
custom 5202048467471441773
51
2.34%
custom 6161346017376608478
50
2.30%
custom 5433662378568852997
49
2.25%
custom 6309941942968920125
42
1.93%
custom 5190668878606264154
41
1.89%
custom 5224539712257033642
37
1.70%
custom 5435853911401467489
36
1.66%
custom 5280886938696447325
29
1.33%
custom 6311996440574958911
20
0.92%
custom 6309625704526914275
17
0.782%
custom 5368395475718262364
15
0.69%
8 further kinds
51
2.34%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.55%
1 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,080
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdbEMRd
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
с макияжем из поста выше отправились вчера с подругами обедать в новый senti menti на парке культуры🥞 оформление очень понравилось! а вот эта зона возле туалетов вообще абалденная (мы там минут 15 фоткались на все возможные устройства ахвхах)
пробовала стейк-салат и вот этот нежнейший лимонный меренговый торт✨ полный балдеж! вот тут уже писала про их коллаб с zielinski & rozen (там коктейли по мотивам ароматов + дар…
доброе утро, девочки, щас буду чучут ругаться.
вот эта палетка из коллабы со смешариками вообще не понимаю кому и для чего. делаю свотчи, а матовые дико пыльные и полупрозрачные. наношу на веки, эти розовые ещё и ложатся болезненным оттенком на глаза.
сияшки шикарные вопросов нет, но тут 4 абсолютно несочетающихся оттенка. я хотела в макияже потестить все, но я просто не придумала, куда их уместно и симпотно добави…
девочки, я нашла идеальное местечко для обеда с подругами!💕 завела меня туда любовь к косметике и подаркам, но в итоге остались в восторге все!
ближе к делу: у любимок Holika Holika снова вкусный коллаб, на этот раз с Pasta Queen. при заказе такого клубничного напитка дарят бальзам для губ — ну просто сказка🍓 мы с подругой сразу потестили и обалдели от фотогеничного освещения! нам зашло абсолютно всё из меню, поэтом…
хочу до конца лета сделать творческий конкурс или, чтобы всем было комфортно принять участие, один макияжный и один просто по комментам (только среди моей аудитории)
что думаете? соберу два бьюти боксика на подарки💕
мама удивилась, что нет комментариев по поводу этого макияжа… говорит, что очень крутой вообще-то, недостаточно оценили💔
вообще у нас случайно сформировалась негласная традиция: я всегда присылаю ей кружочек с макияжем, как только сделаю, а она мне в ответ в голосом рассказывает свои ассоциации
я не люблю стараться. не люблю долго что-то вырисовывать, не люблю делать черновик, не люблю продумывать заранее.
у меня так ещё со школы, я всегда писала очень быстро и обожала сразу в чистовик. удивительно, а ведь я всегда была так уверена в своих мыслях. или может я просто не люблю долго решать задачу, чето там растягивать, раздумывать.
села с пустой головой и идеей, что хочу сделать что-то с фиолетовым. ну, рез…
два образа этой недели с мужской рубашкой из бифри
этим летом нашла для себя оптимальный «набор» удобного лука и дальше просто экспериментирую с составляющими
для моих коктейльных любительниц: оч клевый коллаб увидела у senti menti и zielinski & rozen🍒
дарят аж 10 мл парфюма при заказе одного из трёх спэшл-коктейлей по мотивам парфюмов! описания звучат соблазнительно, попробуйте за меня🥹
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pray4barbiee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 226,527 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Это Лиза @etolizochka · 126,780 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
москоугёрлз @mossgirls · 951,613 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бьюти нефильтрованное” (@pray4barbiee), 11,129 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pray4barbiee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
