Video message, posted without a caption
custom 531905965883553621940custom 531881309764797438428custom 526741637506796420319custom 53190231086639125218custom 54181853866083231943custom 54564666534558819231

Channel
@pray4barbiee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,809subscribers
-383 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001138132129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pray4barbiee |
| Description | Владилена. бьюти криэйторка и муза. по вопросам рекламы: @wladil3na (присылайте сразу ссылки!!) буст канала: https://t.me/boost/pray4barbiee РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/673d8b4a9d804a279bc79afd |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pray4barbiee |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 00:00 | 10,809 | +14 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 10,795 | +38 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:57 | 10,757 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:51 | 10,767 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:49 | 10,775 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:59 | 10,773 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:16 | 10,779 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 10,784 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:29 | 10,786 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 10,790 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 10,792 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 10,794 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 10,801 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 10,797 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 10,801 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 10,800 | +15 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 10,785 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 10,789 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 10,799 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 10,806 | first reading |
67 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 67 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 37,195 |
| Reactions total | 3,717 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 23:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,803 reactions across 67 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5434074373306723076 | 1,146 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5298543222832769988 | 729 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5408908974508490145 | 589 | 8.66% | |
| custom 5267416375067964203 | 561 | 8.25% | |
| custom 5233605456210977245 | 540 | 7.94% | |
| custom 5321040910069310489 | 375 | 5.51% | |
| custom 5375360821750670829 | 322 | 4.73% | |
| custom 5222483324865372101 | 285 | 4.19% | |
| custom 5456466653455881923 | 245 | 3.60% | |
| custom 5400322072163395142 | 163 | 2.40% | |
| custom 5319023108663912521 | 153 | 2.25% | |
| custom 5355174247826217637 | 120 | 1.76% | |
| custom 5474167631021902688 | 115 | 1.69% | |
| custom 5418185386608323194 | 114 | 1.68% | |
| custom 5436302825678185046 | 113 | 1.66% | |
| custom 5456281879667839252 | 95 | 1.40% | |
| custom 5190668878606264154 | 93 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5310076562937226844 | 89 | 1.31% | |
| custom 5449402428686355179 | 69 | 1.01% | |
| custom 5222438210528897453 | 68 | 1% | |
| 33 further kinds | 819 | 12.0% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjdbEMRd | 1 | 11 August 2026 | 11 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 531905965883553621940custom 531881309764797438428custom 526741637506796420319custom 53190231086639125218custom 54181853866083231943custom 54564666534558819231
пара месяцев перед новым годом у меня насыщенны на дамские дни рождения в семье, поэтому служба поиска подарков в лице меня открывается заблаговременно. и пока я ищу подарки другим, успеваю насобирать вишлист✨ стабильно закупаюсь (и на подарки, и себе в том числе) аромобоксами. сразу оформленный подарок + идеальный формат полноценно потестить свои хотелки перед покупкой полноразмера. я так сейчас все парфюмы предвар…
custom 545628187966783925215custom 54181853866083231949custom 54088964460888831824custom 53190231086639125212custom 54564666534558819232custom 54565045264774975092custom 52674163750679642031
моё гилти плежер: читать развернутые описания парфюмов с историей аромата
custom 545628187966783925230custom 541818538660832319415custom 54088964460888831829custom 54564666534558819234custom 52674163750679642031custom 53190231086639125211
порадовал кушон monolove! тон с ним получился ооч красивый🍽💀 на фото скрин из ролика с затестом, вот тут с макияжем легкий, но комфортно наслаивается, у меня на фото два тонких слоя. финиш натуральное-сияющий, кожа выглядит живой + ничего не подчеркнул и лег ровно кароче, неожиданно и приятно! оттенок 01 подошел идеально
custom 545628187966783925248custom 545646665345588192319custom 526741637506796420314custom 54088964460888831828custom 54565045264774975093custom 53190231086639125212custom 54181853866083231942
руки на стол! девчонки из amen beauty привезли к нам новые палетки cheeryep🤫 ближайшие дни буду занята… мощным затестом фиолетовых и розовых теней!! у нас если что имеется промик на 10% WLADIL3NA10😉
custom 526741637506796420358custom 540890897450849014554custom 545646665345588192321custom 545650452647749750911custom 54181853866083231946custom 54562818796678392522custom 54494024286863551791
вы стоолько всего интересного отправляете в чатик под постом про вдохновение!! этот комментарий собрал немало классов, поэтому я решила вам сюда продублировать💀
custom 540890897450849014535custom 526741637506796420321custom 531902310866391252113custom 54564666534558819238custom 54494024286863551792custom 54181853866083231941custom 54585381505424786461
Хочу поделиться инструментами, которые сильно упрощают мне жизнь и помогают вдохновиться даже тогда, когда не цепляет ничего. Очень рада, что наконец-то могу это кому-то посоветовать (не реклама) 1 - outfitsy Приложение для создания онлайн-гардероба. Делаешь фото вещи, загружаешь в приложение, оно обрезает фон, выбираешь нужную группу и готово. Образы можно привязывать к датам, к стилям (спортивный, повседневный) ил…
custom 545646665345588192346custom 526741637506796420325custom 531902310866391252116custom 54089089745084901457custom 54181853866083231945custom 54494024286863551792custom 54585381505424786461
что бы запостить моим красоточкам? может, показать других красоток✨ зажала пару отзывов на мой урок онлайновый макияжным я вам давно про него не писала, но сейчас напоминаю: он ещё неделю в доступе и всё!! (в доступе для покупки, во владении навсегда🤩) в этом году больше не будет возможности научиться вот так легко и просто, а я там все растушевки расстановки основы рассказываю забрать урок можно тут
custom 540890897450849014530custom 526741637506796420314custom 53190231086639125218custom 54494024286863551795custom 54181853866083231941custom 54564666534558819231
🩷 румяна monolove 🩷 лиловый и сливовый текстура пудровая, в корейском стиле, очень мягкие и нежные в нанесении. суперски пигментированы! для сочного румянца достаточно совсем немного продукта в этом макияже наносила оба оттенка💀 единственное, я по упаковкам думала, что будет что-то навороченное, но дизайн довольно минималистичный. это не минус, продукт внутри отличный
custom 540890897450849014547custom 526741637506796420327custom 545853815054247864615custom 54564666534558819236custom 53190231086639125212custom 54181853866083231942custom 54494024286863551791
тема с разными глазами меня не отпускает✨ решила поэкспериментировать с пучками и без туши их приклеить, а то, на фоне моих ресничек прокрашенных, накладные вообще теряются. вайб имеется! ещё побалуюсь на лице тестировала продукты monolove, можно посмотреть в тиктоках и иг, так как ролик вышел длинный🌟 без краткого обзора тут тоже не оставлю
custom 540890897450849014560custom 526741637506796420336custom 541818538660832319419custom 545646665345588192313custom 53190231086639125215custom 54585381505424786463custom 54494024286863551791
пов ты кукла братс и покупаешь клей для ресниц😐 это мой самый любимый клей уже лет 8!! я ради него зашла в приложение яблока впервые за полгода, а он там пропал. на маркетплейсах чето сильный оверпрайс за свой объем…
custom 540890897450849014541custom 531878335929438249919custom 531902310866391252112custom 54564666534558819237
Posted without readable text
custom 540890897450849014574custom 545646665345588192340custom 544940242868635517929custom 526741637506796420314custom 541818538660832319411custom 53190231086639125213
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @pray4barbiee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 2 posts on @pray4barbiee as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бьюти нефильтрованное” (@pray4barbiee), 10,809 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pray4barbiee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.