Бьюти-блогер, визажист, мама и просто женщина.
По рекламе: @patches_kseny
Мой max-канал: https://max.ru/kseny_patches
Клуб здоровья: https://max.ru/channel_lapshinahealth
Мой inst: https://www.instagram.com/lapshina_kseny/
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net -6,157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,298–42,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 04:38
31,870
+5
6 Nov 2026, 03:40
31,865
+8
5 Nov 2026, 06:10
31,857
-13
4 Nov 2026, 06:40
31,870
+216
3 Nov 2026, 05:50
31,654
-73
2 Nov 2026, 03:36
31,727
-75
1 Nov 2026, 02:19
31,802
-59
30 Oct 2026, 23:36
31,861
-63
30 Oct 2026, 01:21
31,924
-82
28 Oct 2026, 22:29
32,006
-91
27 Oct 2026, 19:17
32,097
-61
26 Oct 2026, 19:36
32,158
-100
25 Oct 2026, 17:56
32,258
-71
24 Oct 2026, 17:10
32,329
-58
23 Oct 2026, 16:16
32,387
-97
22 Oct 2026, 12:47
32,484
-136
21 Oct 2026, 06:36
32,620
-101
20 Oct 2026, 05:37
32,721
-106
19 Oct 2026, 03:51
32,827
-113
18 Oct 2026, 02:11
32,940
first reading
Engagement
204 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 31,870 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,990
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 204 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
204 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
267,090
Reactions total
6,508
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,420
Videos
≈739
Links
≈900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 18s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27,126 reactions across 204 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,603
72.3%
😍
4,877
18.0%
custom 5451804045549250264
1,645
6.06%
🕊
1,001
3.69%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 204 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 204 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kseny_patches. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 204 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (4.48%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✨🤍🧴
Ох, как люблю всю эту бьюти-рутину!
Готова мазаться кремушками 24/7
Кстати, стоит 2 больших коробки от брендов с самыми лучшими баночками. Хочу в ближайшее время вам все показать:))
Ваши любимые бьюти-средства за последнее время? Делитесь)
Схема моей небрежной укладки: накручиваю прядь на плойку, не докручивая до конца, те остается ‘хвостик’ пряди > даю остыть >> в конце наклоняю голову, запускаю ручки в волосы и хаотичными движениями как будто расчесываю >>> сбрызгиваю лаком
Готово!
P.s. лак сейчас люблю именно такой, но есть идея попробовать сбрызнуть локоны солью для бОльшей текстуры 💔
Показываю свою технику, на которую делаю укладку
У меня есть модный стайлер Дайсон, но он пылится, так как не держит мой волос от слова совсем.
А вот, что правда работает: плойка Харизма за 2000₽, которой уже лет 8 точно. Заметьте, она конусовидная, но отлично подойдет и просто плойка с одним диаметром 🤌🏽
Показать на что делаю эту укладку?
100 ❤️ и даю все явки-пароли!
А пока делюсь первой ступенью: несмываемый уход на влажные волосы. У меня Tokio Outkarami Premium. За счёт кератина, шелка, керамида NG и гематина получаю огромную дозу увлажнения (а моему блонду это и подавай)
ОБЩИЙ СБОР (очень нужна ваша обратная связь)
Предыстория: я каждый день рождения дарю сама себе желанный подарок. В этом году захотела обновить парфюмерный гардероб и подобрать в коллекцию что-то помимо Tom Ford.
Я запланировала 3 визита в Золотое Яблоко, чтобы с чувством, толком, расстановкой выбрать новый аромат.
Но пару дней назад задумалась о распиве. За деньги, на которые можно купить один флакон, приобрести …
Пополняю свою личную коллекцию баночек-малышек. На этот раз смотрите, какая милаташка от Bioderma 🐣
А баночка хоть и маленькая, но такая рабочая. Мой 6 или 7 повтор этого масла для душа.
Несколько фактов:
1. для сухой, очень сухой и чувствительной кожи, хотя я использую и на свою (у меня комби)
2. без мыла, с лёгкой пеной.
3. в составе есть ниацинамид
4. подходит для лица и тела
5. для всей семьи. И Лизе, которой г…
Мамааа, я визажист!
Отучилась 🤓 свой экзамен покажу, как будет готов ролик, там разрыв
.. а пока ничего необычного: отмечаю борщем с просекко))
❤118😍30custom 54518040455492502647
Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @kseny_patches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @kseny_patches as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Mamma Mia — Santa Maria 🧚🏼♀️ @rovnermaria · 13,818#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Pavlychenkoann 💔 @milovidnayanna · 27,049 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
Хэлфи Клуб @healthy_clubbyLiza · 38,901 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Taty Ilina @tatyilina · 30,727 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
О ВАЖНОМ 2.0 @kids_morozova · 19,321 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
На страже красоты😍 @mskateantonova · 17,931 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
nastya baldabekova @nastyaabeautyy · 29,326 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
By Anakossh @anakossssh · 21,560 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
SHIKstudio @shikcosmetics · 52,024 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
YANSIKK @yansikk · 35,780 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
by p.llna @pllnnaa · 28,427 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Lera Salomatina @withheartValeria · 43,019 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
with love, July 🤞🏻 @julvolchkova · 19,360 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
Eireen Sh. 💌 @witheireen · 40,219 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
BY KAORI | Юлия Вельчева-Лутак @BY_KAORI · 31,315 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 September 2026
Poydemsomnoy🕊 @polenukk · 32,642 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
M13 @CharliesAngelsZ · 47,631 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
SOFIA 💌 @sofia_molz · 51,340 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Инна Плетнева | Красота моими глазами @innamakeru · 60,071 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Блог Нечаевой @NechaevaBlog · 44,223 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
by Ancho 🪐 @varichevaa · 22,854 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
romanova_fit @romanova_fitt · 32,618 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Реалии Аполлинарии @ba_polly · 23,104 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
DG Beauty @dgrbeauty · 44,918 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
SOFIKSHEN здесь! @sofikshenzdes · 16,330 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 50 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KSENY LAPSHINA” (@kseny_patches), 31,870 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kseny_patches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.