Channel
@mo3inat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,535subscribers
-415 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001347632136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mo3inat |
| Description | "لهُ أَصْحَابٌ يَدْعُونَهُ إِلَى الْهُدَى ائْتِنَا" رابط قناة التلاوات 👇 https://t.me/ghonder8 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mo3inat |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 22,535 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 22,554 | -18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 22,572 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 22,580 | -20 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 22,600 | -35 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 22,635 | -33 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 22,668 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:53 | 22,685 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 22,692 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 22,703 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 22,715 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 22,717 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 22,725 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 22,733 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 22,741 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 22,759 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 22,768 | -15 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 22,783 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 22,808 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 22,813 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (14 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 43,441 |
| Reactions total | 743 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,141 reactions across 43 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,561 | 72.9% | |
| 😢 | 198 | 9.25% | |
| 😁 | 197 | 9.20% | |
| 👍 | 134 | 6.26% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 0.841% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 0.794% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 0.607% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.093% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.047% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[لا تفكك الصورة] أحيانا اجتماع بعض الصغائر أو المكروهات معا يجعل الصورة والحكم مختلفا. سأضرب لك مثالا يتضح به المراد الموسيقى. الغناء. الاختلاط. مس الرجل للمرأة. شرب المسكرات. الرقص. التبرج. البعض يرى بعضها صغائر أو مكروها أو خلاف الأولى أو مباحا. تخيل اجتماع هذه الصغائر معا في حفل صاخب يموج فيه الشباب والفتيات في بعض، هل مازلت تراها مجرد صغائر أو مكروهات اجتمعن وانتهى الأمر؟ لا ليس كذلك.. بل هي صورة فجة للفسوق…
👍12❤6🔥1
القاصد للخير الذي لو قدَر عليه لفَعلَه وإنما يتركُه عجزًا يُكتَبُ له مثلُ أجرِ فاعلِه، كما قال النبي ﷺ "إنّ بالمدينة رجالاً ما سِرْتُم مَسِيرًا ولا قطعتم واديًا إلا كانوا معكم"، قالوا: وهم بالمدينة؟ قال: "وهم بالمدينة، حَبَسَهم العذرُ". (ابن تيمية | جامع المسائل)
❤30👍1
قيل لأَشعب: قد صِرتَ شيخاً كبيراً و بلغت هذا المبلغ، و لم تحفظ من الحديث شيئاً!؟ قال: بل والله ما سمع أحدٌ من عكرمةَ مثلَ ما سمعت! قالوا: حدثنا. قال: سمعت عكرمة يُحدث عن ابن عباس عن رسول الله ﷺ قال: "خصلتان لا يجتمعان في مسلم.. " نَسى عكرمة واحدةً، و نسيتُ أنا الأخرى. 😁
😁46❤1🌚1👍1
عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، أَنَّ رَجُلًا أَتَى النَّبِيَّ ﷺ وَكَانَ رَجُلًا جَمِيلًا، فَقَالَ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، إِنِّي رَجُلٌ حُبِّبَ إِلَيَّ الْجَمَالُ وَأُعْطِيتُ مِنْهُ مَا تَرَى، حَتَّى مَا أُحِبُّ أَنْ يَفُوقَنِي أَحَدٌ -إِمَّا قَالَ: بِشِرَاكِ نَعْلِي. وَإِمَّا قَالَ: بِشِسْعِ نَعْلِي- أَفَمِنَ الْكِبْرِ ذَلِكَ؟ قَالَ: "لَا، وَلَكِنَّ الْكِبْرَ مَنْ بَطِرَ الْحَقَّ وَغَمِطَ النَّاسَ". رواه أبو داود. -----------…
❤28
عن أنس رضي الله عنه قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ: مَا تَحابا الرَّجُلانِ إِلا كَان أَفضَلُهُما أَشدَّهُما حُباً لِصاحِبه. [رواه البخاري في الأدب المفرد]
❤42👍2🥰2
من أعجب الأشياء غفلة الأهل عن توفير مُربي ومؤدب أو محفظ قرآن لأبنائهم. تجد الأب يوفر للأولاد نادي للعب أو يشترك له مع مدرب لعبة ما، وكذلك في التعليم، بينما يغفل عن أهم شيء وهو دين طفله وأخلاقه. البعض يغفل أساسا عن هذه الفكرة والبعض الآخر _للأسف_ يبخل بها، رغم أن تكلفة هذا المربي في الشهر ربما لا تساوي ثمن عشاء أو سهرة أو خروجة بالنسبة له. والله إن الوالدين أول المنتفعين بهذا في الدنيا قبل الآخرة، فكيف يغفلون أو يب…
❤33👍14😢4
ولا ريب أنّ تمكين النساء من اختلاطهن بالرجال: أصلُ كلِّ بلية وشر، وهو من أعظم أسباب نزول العقوبات العامة، كما أنه من أسباب فساد أمور العامة والخاصة. (ابن القيِّم | الطرق الحكمية)
❤26👍14😢3
أنشر على هذه القناة 👈 أبوإسحاق كتاباتي وصوتياتي، وأنشر هنا متنوع من نقولات.
❤8👍2
ينبغي للإنسان أن يراعي قلوب الناس، فإذا انكسر قلب شخص؛ فليحرص على جبره بما استطاع، لأن في هذا فضلا عظيما. (ابن عثيمين | فتح ذي الجلال والإكرام)
❤38👍4
كان بعض السلف يدور على المجالس ويقول: من أحب أن تدوم له العافية؛ فليتق الله. (تفسير ابن رجب الحنبلي)
❤38👍4
ذكرت لنا سورة الكهف أن الله جعل ما على الأرض زينة ليبلونا أينا (أحسن عملا). فأحسن الناس عملا من استطاع أن يتعامل مع هذه الزينة -التي جعلها الله على الأرض- على مراد الله، ولابد قبل ذلك أن يراها على حقيقتها ولا يُفتن بها. وهذا هو الرشد المذكور في السورة، كما فعل أصحاب الكهف، فلقد فارقوا زينة قومهم إلى كهف بحثوا فيه عن الرشد. ولكنه قد يبدو للناس المُعظمين للزينة أنهم ضيّعوا أعمارهم، أو يظهر لهم أنهم لم يقدروا الزينة حق…
❤30
أتى رجلٌ عمرَ بن الخطّاب رضي الله عنه فقال له: إنّ ابنةً لي أصابتْ حدّا، فعمدَتْ إلى الشّفرة فذبحتْ نفسَها، فأدركتُها وقد قطعتْ بعضَ أوداجِها، فداويتُها فبرأتْ، ثمّ أنّها نسَكت فأقبلَتْ على القرآن، فهي تُخطَب إليّ. فأخبرُ مِن شأنها بالذي كان؟ فقال له عمر: تعمد إلى ستْر ستره الله تعالى فتكشفه؟! لئن بلغني أنّك ذكرتَ شيئًا مِن أمرها لأجعلنّك نكالًا لأهل الأمصار. بل أنكِحها نكاح العفيفة المسلمة. [مصنّف عبد الرّزاق]
❤55👍2😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @mo3inat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mo3inat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُعِينَات | Mo3inat” (@mo3inat), 22,535 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mo3inat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.