Channel
@alshafe3i
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,852subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001497932457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alshafe3i |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alshafe3i |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 1,852 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 1,851 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,851 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 81.6% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"وقد أكثر هو وأصحابُه من ذكر جهم بن صفوان وليس قصدهم إلَّا جعلَ الأشاعرة.. فرقةً جهميَّة". - عبد الوهَّاب السبكي متحدِّثًا عن الإمام الذهبيِّ وأصحابه من أهلِ الحديث. الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤3
ابن العربي: الأشاعرة ما فارقت التشبيه أصلًا! ❞أبو حيان: حكى ابن العربي الحاتمي تـ٦٣٨هـ في كتابه الفتوحات المكيَّة عجبَه من الأشاعرة والمجسمة، ونسبهم للتشبيه ثمَّ قال -نصًّا-: إن الأشاعرة تخيَّلت أنها لما تأوَّلت قد خرجت من التشبيه وهي ما فارقته، إلَّا أنها انتقلت من تشبيهٍ إلى تشبيه.. فما انتقلوا من التشبيه أصلًا❝ - ابن العربي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤3
"النزِق" :)
😁7
ابن عربي الصوفيِّ للرازي المتكلِّم: أنت -مذ ثلاثين سنة- في ورطة! ❞أبو حيان: راسل ابن عربي تـ٦٣٨هـ ابنَ الخطيب الرازي تـ٦٠٦هـ بنصيحةٍ مفادها: إبدال طريقة المتكلِّمين، بطريقة الصوفيَّة الكشفيِّين. وعاتبه فيها، وذكر فيها طرفًا من تقلُّب الرازي وندمه، وأن من المحال معرفة الله بالنظر الكلاميِّ ثمَّ خاطبه: فما لك يا أخي تبقى في هـٰذه الورطة!❝ - ابن عربي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
"ولا عقوبة من اللَّه تعالى أعظم من أن يكلَ العبد إلى نفسه، وحوله وقوته، ويخلِّيه ورأيه ومعقوله، ويحوِّل وجهه إلى الطاغوت الأعظم، والصنم الأكبر". - أبو المُظفَّر السمعانيُّ، قال الجوينيُّ: لو كان الفقه ثوبًا طاويًا، لكان أبو المظفَّر السمعانيُّ طرازه. الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤3
من طريف ما تعلَّق بهـٰذا المنشور، ما نشر صاحب «المنتخب» أنَّ قولَ أبي حامدٍ -رحِمه اللَّه ورضيَ عنه- السابقَ أُثبتَ على صفحة المخطوط الأولى لكتاب ابن عساكر في الذبِّ عن ابن أبي بشر، الموسوم بـ«تبيين كذب المُفتري في الذبِّ عن أبي الحسَن الأشعري»، فأقول: سبحان اللَّه! ونصُّه: "فائدة منقولة من خطِّ من يوثق به من أهل العلم والدين، وهيَ: ذكر الشيخ الإمام أبو الحسَن مُحمَّد بن عبد الملك الكرَجيُّ في كتابه الذي سمَّاه «الف…
❤5
نصرانيٌّ يهنِّئ المعتزلة بجهود الأشاعرة في إذاعة الكلاميَّات! ❞أبو حيان: أفرد جورج مقدسي تـ١٤٢٣هـ في رسالته «الأشعري والأشاعرة» مبحثًا في الكلام عن جهود ابن عساكر تـ٥٧١هـ ضمن كتابه «تبيين كذب المفتري». وذكر دعوته الشافعية لقبول علم الكلام، وصرف نصوص الشافعي تـ٢٠٤هـ في ذمِّه وتأويلها حتى يكسب تأييدهم للأشعرية، ثم بيَّن فرح المعتزلة بصنيعه، قائلًا: "يحقُّ لهـٰؤلاء المعتزلة مؤسِّسي علم الكلام أن يهنؤوا في قبورهم، وي…
❤1
"﴿ثمَّ استوى إلى السماء﴾، قال ابن عبَّاس وأكثر مفسِّري السلف: أي ارتفعَ إلى السماء". - أبو مُحمَّد البغوي، محيي السنة وركن الدين. الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤3
ردُّ حديث الآحاد بدعة تزعج ضمائر المؤمنين! ❞أبو حيان: قال العلامة سليمان دنيا تـ١٤٠٦هـ: "وأيًّا ما كان الأمر؛ فردُّ قول من أقوال رسول الله ﷺ توفَّر له من أسباب الصدق والقبول مالم يتوفر لكلام سواه.. بدعةٌ ينزعج لها ضمير المؤمن، ويؤذيه سماعها"،اهـ❝ - سليمان دنيا / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
Signed الحسن بن زياد
تخطيء مالكٍ لمخالفته المتقرِّر من نفي الكيف! ❞أبو حيان: قال الطويراني تـ١٣١٥هـ في «شرح المبادئ الحسنية» قادحًا في قول مالك: "الاستواء معلومٌ، والكيف مجهول"، ما نصُّه: "ثم هو أقرَّ بوجود كيف لذلك الاستواء الذي زعم أنه معلوم، وقيَّده بأنه مجهول؛ فبقي أن هنالك كيفًا وإن جُهِل"،اهـ❝ - الطويراني / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤1
Signed الحسن بن زياد
الشبراملسي: ابن تيميَّة شيخ الإسلام، ولا عبرة بتحامُل الهيتمي! ❞أبو حيان: قال خاتمة المحققين نور الدين الشبراملسي الشافعي تـ١٠٨٧هـ ردًّا على الهيتمي تـ٩٧٤هـ عند قوله: "ومن أراد ذلك فعليه بمطالعة كلام السبكي"، ما نصُّه: "ومن هنا تعلم: أن أكثر ما في الجواب تحاملٌ؛ لمَا هو معلوم ممَّا كان بين السبكي وبين ابن تيمية؛ ولذلك ردَّ غير واحد على السبكي في ذلك. ومنهم السيوطيُّ، وترجم لابن تيمية ترجمة عظيمة، وأنه من الأئمة ا…
❤6👍1
Signed الحسن بن زياد
الآمدي: لا نستبعد كلام الربِّ بحرف وصوت! ❞أبو حيان: قال سيف الدين الآمديُّ تـ٦٣١هـ في «غاية المرام»: "نعم لو قيل: إن كلامه بحروف وأصوات لا كحروفنا وأصواتنا، كما أن ذاته وصفاته ليست كذاتنا وصفاتنا؛ كما قال بعض السلف، فالحق أن ذلك غير مستبعد عقلًا.."،اهـ❝ - الآمدي / كناشة المنهوم الشافعيُّ الخالص: https://t.me/alshafe3i
❤3👏1
Signed الحسن بن زياد
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alshafe3i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 275,318 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@alshafe3i named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشافعي الخالص” (@alshafe3i), 1,852 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alshafe3i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.