Channel
@NewResistance
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,587subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001490461830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NewResistance |
| Created | 9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NewResistance |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @wartimedia/1328897 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC | @NewResistance/50980 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | 0.98 | 31 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @wartimedia | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 23 minutes | this entry (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 34 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @CyberspecNews. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 28,587 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 28,581 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 28,597 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 28,611 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 28,619 | +12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 28,607 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 28,608 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 28,618 | first reading |
133 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 130 of 133 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 163,150 |
| Reactions total | 3,790 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,482 reactions across 122 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.68% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 337 | 9.68% | |
| 🤬 | 337 | 9.68% | |
| ❤ | 333 | 9.56% | |
| 🔥 | 249 | 7.15% | |
| 👏 | 245 | 7.04% | |
| 👻 | 168 | 4.82% | |
| 👀 | 146 | 4.19% | |
| 🙏 | 143 | 4.11% | |
| 🦄 | 139 | 3.99% | |
| 🌚 | 127 | 3.65% | |
| 😈 | 117 | 3.36% | |
| ⚡ | 112 | 3.22% | |
| 🤯 | 104 | 2.99% | |
| 🍾 | 90 | 2.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 80 | 2.30% | |
| ✍ | 75 | 2.15% | |
| 🤩 | 64 | 1.84% | |
| 😐 | 61 | 1.75% | |
| 😢 | 59 | 1.69% | |
| 🎉 | 55 | 1.58% | |
| 24 further kinds | 441 | 12.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,790reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💢 A government VIP aircraft belonging to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), a Boeing 737-700 BBJ operated by Royal Jet, made brief visits to Iran. On August 11th, the aircraft departed from Abu Dhabi and flew to the Tehran area, where it remained for approximately one hour. On August 12th, the same aircraft returned, this time landing at Karaj/Payam Airport, located about 40 kilometers west of Tehran. It stayed there …
🇪🇺 The dual shock of 2022–2025—the conflict in Ukraine and Trump’s return—has brought defense back to the center of European politics with a sense of urgency not seen since 1954. The EU implemented three responses in the first half of 2025, and it is worth examining them because, upon closer inspection, each falls into a trap. The first is the ReArmEU plan, which suspends fiscal rules to allow for greater military s…
✍1💯1
💢 The West is trying to "cancel" Russia and all Russians, and to destroy historical memory, stated Medvedev. Examples of heroes of the special military operation help to better convey the truth about Russia's role, so that there are no "young fools" in the country who are swayed by promises and money, emphasized the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council. Subscribe @NewResistance
💯16💊1
💢 "The U.S. State Department has instructed embassies across the Middle East to prepare plans for operating with a significantly reduced staff, as the conflict with Iran remains unresolved." CNN reports that employees being transferred from diplomatic posts in the region are also increasingly being offered the option of early retirement. These plans have not yet been finalized and may not apply to all embassies cur…
❤3👏2
💢 Professor Marandi: Dr. Rezaei's appointment signals prominent SNSC role amid US escalation Marandi contrasts Iran's active political environment with Western-backed regional autocracies, dispels baseless rumors surrounding President Pezeshkian, and explains why the appointment of Dr. Mohsen Rezaei as head of the Supreme National Security Council reflects the strategic demands of guiding Iran during a state of war …
💢 Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani reportedly asked the Iraqi government during a recent visit to Iraq to postpone efforts to disarm Iran-aligned armed groups. According to Al Arabiya, Qaani warned that imposing a state monopoly on weapons at the present time would be viewed by Iran as “a stab at Iran”. Subscribe @NewResistance
❤3👻2
💢 Grain exports from Ukraine are rapidly declining due to the naval blockade. According to the Ministry of Agrarian Policy, in the first 12 days of August, wheat exports decreased by 4.3 times (to 175,000 tons compared to 759,000 tons during the same period last year), barley by 5.6 times (to 37,000 tons), and corn by 2.7 times (to 68,000 tons). It is worth noting that the direct losses to Ukraine's agricultural se…
⚡5
💢 Petition calling for mandatory military service for childless women has only garnered 393 signatures – Ukrainian government website The idea behind the petition has been criticized from the outset and has not gained widespread support. Currently, the number of signatures does not exceed 2% of the required amount. Subscribe @NewResistance
👀8🕊2🤯1
💢 A large warehouse is on fire in Brovary, near Kiev, following strikes by "Geran" type drones. Reports also indicate a series of explosions in Chernihiv and the Chernihiv region. Meanwhile, a third wave of KAB glide bombs is hitting the Kherson region, which is under the control of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Subscribe @NewResistance
🔥4🎉3⚡2❤1
💢 Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski: Hey, @elonmusk, big man, stop discriminating Polish users of Starlink or we might re-think paying you $50 million p.a. for your services. According to the minister, Warsaw may refuse further payments for satellite communication services if Polish users are not restored to their previous preferential roaming conditions. Previously, SpaceX removed Poland from the European…
😐5✍2❤1
💢 The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has hired over 2,000 gamers to train as air traffic controllers, as they possess skills essential for this profession, such as multitasking, quick decision-making, and problem-solving abilities. Thanks to a campaign launched in April, the FAA has achieved 94% of its hiring goal, and more than 2,000 additional candidates are currently undergoing the selection process. …
❤7👾4👀1👏1
💢 🛸 U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has “long been on this UAP thing,” stressing that the issue is not a conspiracy theory: “I don’t know who it is, I don’t know what it is, but there are things flying over our military installations, and they’re not ours, and we should look into this and be serious about it.” "Do you realize there’s things flying over our airspace? We don’t know what they are.” “And th…
😐7👻4🤯3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @NewResistance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 46,445 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance” (@NewResistance), 28,587 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewResistance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.