Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 45 of the 46 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 829 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @zwanzig4. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
66 measurements spanning 99 days, net -2,540. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107,881–111,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 07:20
108,262
-40
10 Nov 2026, 17:20
108,302
-22
9 Nov 2026, 07:38
108,324
-21
8 Nov 2026, 00:06
108,345
-20
6 Nov 2026, 23:09
108,365
-17
5 Nov 2026, 22:37
108,382
-44
4 Nov 2026, 20:58
108,426
-62
3 Nov 2026, 17:29
108,488
-3
2 Nov 2026, 19:49
108,491
-29
1 Nov 2026, 17:10
108,520
-45
31 Oct 2026, 20:41
108,565
-24
30 Oct 2026, 22:36
108,589
-14
30 Oct 2026, 01:41
108,603
-17
29 Oct 2026, 02:35
108,620
-40
27 Oct 2026, 23:15
108,660
-12
26 Oct 2026, 23:41
108,672
-19
25 Oct 2026, 20:35
108,691
-12
24 Oct 2026, 21:56
108,703
-13
23 Oct 2026, 23:35
108,716
-30
22 Oct 2026, 20:37
108,746
first reading
Engagement
1,172 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 221 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.67%
avg views ÷ 108,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,390
391 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
405
of 1,172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
1,172 (31 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
3,670,584
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 05:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19h 40m
Average length
5m 11s
Measured directly from 228 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 65 of 405 posts held from the last 30 days (16.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸🇷🇺 Die USA haben Russland aufgefordert, vorzuschlagen, wie weit die NATO sich ausdehnen soll, so Axios.
Die USA haben Russland aufgefordert, ein neues Abkommen zur europäischen Sicherheit vorzuschlagen, als Teil der Bemühungen, den Krieg in der Ukraine zu beenden. Dies könnte die langjährigen Forderungen Moskaus nach einer Begrenzung der NATO-Erweiterung und einer Reduzierung ihrer militärischen Präsenz in Osteuro…
🇷🇺🇺🇸—🇪🇺👹🏴☠️⚔️🕊
"Ein Teufelskreis"
— Präsident Putin erklärt Witkoff und Kushner, wie die Europäer jede Friedenslösung von Anfang an torpedieren.
🌐 @Nachrichtenwelt
Zweierlei Maß
Gerichte beriefen sich in der Corona-Zeit, und auch heute noch, direkt oder auch indirekt auf ein Reichsgerichts-Urteil.
Ich vermisse mal wieder einen Aufschrei 🤷♀
Quelle
Hier noch mehr Perlen finden 🍀
Willkommen bei den Perlen des Tages - Frei Schnauze 📣 - https://t.me/PerlenDesTages
.
‼️👉Atom-Mails der Bundesnetzagentur: „Von ganz oben gesteuerte Desinformation“
„Klaus Müller persönlich soll entschieden haben, einen Referenten mit klarer Anti-Atom-Linie in den Bayerischen Landtag zu schicken.
❗️ Apollo-News-Investigativchef Daniel Gräber hat die internen Mails recherchiert: „Das ist Täuschung der Öffentlichkeit, Täuschung des Parlaments in Bayern.““ …“
https://t.me/niusde/22436
JETZT abo…
HEUTE LIVE um 18:00 Uhr
Kann es wirklich sein, dass alles was ab 2020 passiert ist durch die brilliante Geschäftsidee einer einzigen Person entstanden ist, die dazu noch nicht mal einen einzigen Befehl geben musste, weil all seine Dominosteine bereits in Position waren?
Es scheint so zu sein.
Vorhang auf - für ein Weltweites Theaterstück, dass sich auf eine einzige Person zurückführen läßt.
Der nette Herr im Rosa…
🚨 BLACK WEEKS BEI HEILNATURA – JETZT STARTEN UNSERE GRÖSSTEN RABATTAKTIONEN! 🔥
💥 BIS ZU 50 % RABATT AUF AUSGEWÄHLTE TOP-PRODUKTE!
Lange gewartet? Jetzt ist der richtige Zeitpunkt, Ihre Favoriten besonders günstig zu sichern!
🔥 DEN ANFANG MACHEN 3 UNSERER TOP-PRODUKTE:
💊 SpikeFORTE – Dr. Schiffmanns bekannte Formel mit 5.000 FU Nattokinase!
⚡️ NRPlus – NAD⁺-Vorstufe Nicotinamid-Ribosid im Fokus der Altersforschun…
‼️Putin empfängt Witkoff und Kushner im Kreml
Im Kreml hat ein Treffen von Wladimir Putin mit den US-Sondergesandten Steve Witkoff und Jared Kushner begonnen. Der russische Präsident bat die Gäste, seinem Amtskollegen Donald Trump seinen Dank für die Organisation der Kontakte zwischen Russland und der Ukraine zu übermitteln. Auch Melania Trump dankte er für ihren Einsatz bei der Lösung der humanitären Frage rund um …
Die bayerische Landtagspräsidentin Ilse Aigner (CSU) warb während der Pandemie für die Corona-Impfung, verurteilte radikale Maßnahmengegner scharf und plädierte später für gesellschaftliche Versöhnung.
Sie betonte den gesundheitlichen Nutzen des Impfens, grenzte jedoch Menschen mit verständlicher Skepsis klar von Extremisten ab.
Aussagen zur Corona-Impfung
Bester Schutz vor schweren Verläufen. Im November 2021 beto…
„Ilse Aigner – nicht geeignet“
Die bayerischen AfD-Fraktionsvorsitzende Katrin Ebner-Steiner über die Nominierung Ilse Aigners als gemeinsame Kandidatin von CDU und CSU für das Amt der Bundespräsidentin:
„Wir in Bayern kennen Ilse Aigner. Wir halten Sie nicht für geeignet. Als Landtagspräsidentin hat sie oft parteipolitisch agiert und die nötige Neutralität vermissen lassen.
Seit dem Einzug der AfD in den Bayerisc…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,172 posts we hold for @AllesAusserMainstream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AllesAusserMainstream edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 27 posts on @AllesAusserMainstream as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 82 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
11
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
11
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AllesAusserMainstream named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@verbotene_wahrheit named in 4 posts, 27 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
@sabisteb named in 2 posts, 12 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
@shomburg named in 2 posts, 12 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
@drhosp1 named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@deutschewelle named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
@djuverdi named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
@expresszeitung named in 1 post, 29 October 2026 – 29 October 2026
@patrikbaab named in 1 post, 24 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
@bittelt named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
@drbines_verbales_vitrio named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026
@haintz_medialaw named in 1 post, 11 September 2026 – 11 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
💥Booom Aktuell💥Austausch über das aktuelle Weltgeschehen...🌍 @booomaktuell · 32,926#41
Das darfst du nicht sehen! In YouTube gelöschte sowie in Facebook gesperrte Videos - Meinungsfreiheit hier Art. 5 Grundgesetz @Medienzensur · 43,688#42
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤ @miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,029 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
Wissen ist Macht offiziell @wissenistmacht1 · 32,987 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Rolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal @Rolf_Kron · 43,856 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung @Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 47,858 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Wir Machen Auf - HAUPT KANAL (Mecit) @wirmachenauf_de · 20,054 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 September 2026
Ignaz Bearth offiziell @ignazbearth · 32,386 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier @rasattelmaier · 38,371 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Trau keinem Promi offiziell @traukeinempromioffiziell · 39,144 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt @RA_Ludwig · 62,924 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner @rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 81,817 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇩🇪/🇦🇹/🇨🇭 @ReinerFuellmich · 89,236 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
BITTEL TV - EINFACH ANDERS @bitteltv · 91,059 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
Bernie aus Australien 🇦🇺 ®™ @bernie006 · 32,295 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
SC-360* Media @SC360Media · 34,367 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 September 2026
Corona_Fakten @Corona_Fakten · 47,850 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Silberjunge Thorsten Schulte OFFIZIELL @silberjungethorstenschulte · 75,460 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
MARKmobil @MARKmobil · 115,678 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Werner Altnickel, Lebenswerk (Offizieller Kanal) @WernerAltnickelAbsicherung · 20,341 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 September 2026
Heiko Schöning offiziell @heiko_schoening · 34,062 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Dave Brych Kanal @davebrych_public · 27,317 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Carsten Jahn - TEAM HEIMAT @CarstenJahn_TEAMHEIMAT · 66,988 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Neverforgetniki @neverforgetnikiblog · 32,295 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
☠️ Giftige Wahrheit @GiftigeWahrheit · 34,363 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
Vivoterra @Vivoterra · 86,794 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 145 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alles Ausser Mainstream” (@AllesAusserMainstream), 108,262 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AllesAusserMainstream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.