Channel
@worlddoctorsalliance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
77,483subscribers
-266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001480430374 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @worlddoctorsalliance |
| Description | Official WDA independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures. |
| Created | 13 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/worlddoctorsalliance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 77,483 | -47 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 77,530 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 77,541 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 77,558 | -23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 77,581 | -56 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 77,637 | -29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 77,666 | -50 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 77,716 | -24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 77,740 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 77,749 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (31 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 187,506 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
GREENHOUSE GASES ARE 99% NATURAL! Did you know that even according to corporate "science" figures, the man-made part of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere accounts for not more than 1%? Meaning 99% of the greenhouse gas effect is natural? Not only man made CO2 is only 5% of yearly CO2, but total CO2 in the atmosphere, including 95% natural, is ONLY 20% of the greenhouse gas effect, as 80% of the greenhouse gas…
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/cp/210778794
https://www.youtube.com/live/oqxIMYEb7Zk?si
https://rumble.com/v7dpjgc-a-call-for-accountability.html
https://youtu.be/ywjZe135E94?si
Fauci had help. Lots of help. He tells us in his diaries. In my latest Saturday Substack, we outline all the friends that helped him push his deadly narrative. We named many of them, but not all, because we ran out of room. It could have been a 15,000 word substack! Take a look if you haven't already read it: https://drtenpenny.substack.com/p/fauci-and-friends-zero-accountability
MODERNA’S NEW MRNA FLU SHOT HAS BEEN APPROVED. BUT WHAT DID THE TRIAL ACTUALLY SHOW? Moderna reported its mRNA flu vaccine was 26.6% more effective than a standard flu vaccine. But that’s the relative number. The absolute difference was much smaller. Influenza occurred in approximately 2.0% of mRNA recipients compared with 2.8% receiving the standard flu shot. Out of every 1,000 people, that works out to about 8 f…
Remember this from Dec.2021, slavishly reported by ‘our BBC’. I wonder how many pregnant women took the now proven to be dangerous and ineffective Covid Gene Therapy for a disease which had a 99.8 survival rate and the average age of death from it of 82 ? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59684926 https://t.me/ABridgen
Chris Whitty is the chief medical officer. He advises the Government and has been in position since 2019. The Covid shots ‘doubled the miscarriage rate in pregnant women Not the 80% miscarriage rate being falsely quoted. What did Whitty know and when ? https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-professor-chris-whitty-urges-pregnant-women-to-get-coronavirus-jabs-as-he-admits-major-concern-about-unvaccinated-12469540 htt…
https://youtu.be/EJGJMn7AkVo?si
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VdnmPEOiHJc
DR JAMES THORP: "The raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women C19 vaccinated during the first trimester, this figures mirrors the effect of chemical abortion drugs such as RU46" DR JAMES THORP: Dr. James Thorp is an obstetrician/gynecologist and maternal fetal medicine physician who has served his obstetrical patients for over 44 years. He was heavily influenced by Dr Semmelweis’s principles and practice i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @worlddoctorsalliance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 87,432 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“World Doctors Alliance” (@worlddoctorsalliance), 77,483 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worlddoctorsalliance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.