Channel
@PMCTchkvsky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,220subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001492471219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PMCTchkvsky |
| Created | 29 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PMCTchkvsky |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 2,220 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 2,213 | +22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 2,191 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 2,191 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,103 |
| Reactions total | 120 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
120 reactions across 24 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 27 | 22.5% | |
| 👍 | 26 | 21.7% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 16.7% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 6.67% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 4.17% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.67% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
And, of course, state-owned media holdings shouldn't be headed by "information pacifists" (as Mrs. Simonyan described herself). Media holdings should be headed by war dogs, equally ready to parse a CNN editorial or put someone down in the comments. Understand? The ability to defend one's point of view and fight in the comments should be on the list of mandatory requirements for professional suitability. Otherwise, wh…
💯2
My critique of the Russian media! First, I went to major Russian news outlets to see what they were writing about today. "A huge magma lake was discovered under Tuscany" (my life hasn't changed at all from this "valuable knowledge") "Russians may be warned against traveling to Armenia" (or they may not be warned – who goes there anyway? And why?) "The Russian Embassy assessed the new British government's policy" (th…
💯2
Get ready! Because I'll be criticizing the Russian media and information policy!
🤔1😁1
ASML, Lam Research, and Applied Materials equipment? Yeah, sanctions work! Russia is done! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://youtu.be/ZrBJBGkPcaU?si=moY9YxHLs6L_s5Uq
Iran’s top Revolutionary Guard commander declared Wednesday that Tehran would continue working on nuclear weapons as long as the United States and Israel possess them, intensifying concerns that Iran is using negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz to postpone concessions on its nuclear program. "As long as the United States and Israel possess nuclear weapons, we will continue working on them for our national securit…
👏1🔥1🥰1
Couldn't resist
🤣1
Once upon a time there were grandma Ursula and little Zely! Grandma Ursula had spoiled little Zely rotten. Zely was used to being indulged; he would whine and stomp his feet, and she would fetch everything he wanted – money, weapons, anything. But now, the good times are over – the poor old woman has nothing left to give. And the foolish child continues to stomp his feet and scream, "Give me! Immediately!" But th…
😁1
Oh, those "pig-Nazis" are squealing about "attacks on civilian ships." And who blew up the oil tankers, huh, Kiev terrorists? P.S. I had a good laugh at the "efforts of international partners," thank you. You can throw Ursula up in the air – maybe she'll shoot down a Geranium drone with herself.
Posted without readable text
😁3
- In Dnipro, police officers clashed with a veteran who had lost a leg. - In the Kyiv region, a soldier who deserted his unit stabbed a 17-year-old girl in front of her brother. - The director of a language center in the Khmelnytskyi region is suspected of corrupting two students, aged 13 and 14. These are news stories from Ukraine from the past three hours. I didn't specifically search for them; I just opened the…
👍3👏2💯2❤1
No, fool! Imperium >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nation state!
💩2😁2
🟥 Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander Europe (NATO): This war has now taken on an existential character for the preservation of American hegemony. There is no longer any path to retreat. Defeat here would mean not just a temporary setback, but the end of the world order that has existed since 1945.
🤡5😁5👍3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @PMCTchkvsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 645,022 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Private Media Company (PMC) Tchaikovsky - Heavenly Oreshnik's Wrath” (@PMCTchkvsky), 2,220 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PMCTchkvsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.