Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Russians With Attitude

Channel

Russians With Attitude

@rwapodcast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,686subscribers

-617 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697410513
TypeChannel
Username@rwapodcast
DescriptionOn X: https://x.com/RWApodcast Substack: https://rwasamizdat.substack.com/ Gumroad: https://russianswithattitude.gumroad.com/l/RWApodcast Contact bot: https://t.me/rwapodcastbot
Created5 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rwapodcast

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,68637,30336,994.56 August 2026 — 37,303 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,301 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,284 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,258 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,225 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,199 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,157 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,149 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,129 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,094 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,077 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,044 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,023 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,002 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,989 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,978 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,970 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,940 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,937 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,948 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,933 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,931 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,918 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,908 subscribers6 September 2026 — 36,853 subscribers10 September 2026 — 36,808 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,766 subscribers14 September 2026 — 36,738 subscribers15 September 2026 — 36,724 subscribers18 September 2026 — 36,686 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,593–37,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:0036,686-38
15 Sept 2026, 20:5836,724-14
14 Sept 2026, 04:3636,738-28
12 Sept 2026, 12:5736,766-42
10 Sept 2026, 07:2136,808-45
6 Sept 2026, 22:4136,853-55
4 Sept 2026, 10:5836,908-10
3 Sept 2026, 00:0336,918-13
2 Sept 2026, 01:1736,931-2
1 Sept 2026, 02:0636,933-15
31 Aug 2026, 01:4436,948+11
30 Aug 2026, 03:3536,937-3
29 Aug 2026, 06:5336,940-30
28 Aug 2026, 03:4236,970-8
27 Aug 2026, 07:1536,978-11
26 Aug 2026, 05:4236,989-13
25 Aug 2026, 03:2537,002-21
23 Aug 2026, 17:4937,023-21
22 Aug 2026, 06:1437,044-33
20 Aug 2026, 18:4337,077first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 36,686 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,230
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held73 (19 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total296,180
Reactions total8,671
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 03:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,640
Videos
≈614
Links
≈775

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 06s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,252 reactions across 72 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5,63332.7%
❤2,46714.3%
👍2,34213.6%
💯1,92811.2%
🫡1,0916.32%
🔥1,0145.88%
👏6263.63%
🤬4562.64%
🤔4362.53%
🥴3181.84%
🥰1751.01%
🗿1540.893%
😢1360.788%
🌭750.435%
🤯680.394%
👎580.336%
😈560.325%
💅510.296%
✍500.29%
🎉450.261%
3 further kinds730.423%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
66
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 72 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rwapodcast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Sept 2026, 15:50 UTC≈3,870 views71 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Surrogate Futurism: on the Russian-Ukrainian war as Europe's last civilizational fantasy. Full episode over at Substack.

👍56🤔7❤5😁3

25 Sept 2026, 11:11 UTC≈4,290 views93 reactionsread 27 September 2026

One of the most frequently asked questions we hear is: when and how do you think the war will end? So, here goes -- a meta discussion on the Special Military Operation. We covered a wide range of topics, such as the failure of the Russian “Realpolitik” approach in 2022, interpreting Western Russophobia as religious mania, the esoteric core of Ukrainian nationalism and why it’s different from your regular “Eastern Eu…

❤52👍33🤔3✍2🫡2🎉1

24 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC≈4,820 views301 reactionsread 27 September 2026

What's effectively poisoning the Western, and especially Anglo-Protestant, conception of modern Russia is the assumption that our societies are fundamentally the same, and that it's simply the laws, institutions, or constitution that make them different. Hence all the easily quantifiable "freedom" rankings based on what the rules say on paper. When they look at the Ukraine war, they naturally imagine their own socie…

👍197❤51👏20🤔14🥴8✍7🔥4

21 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC≈7,000 views181 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁121❤38👍9🫡6🥰5🎉1👏1

21 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC≈7,450 views205 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

There's a random wholesome story from Russia: 121-year-old grandma Yakha Khashagova from Chechnya voted in an election. Her passport says she was born in 1905, which would make her the oldest person in the world. I decided to check the story. No Imperial Russian, or any other, birth certificate survived, but that's not particularly surprising for Chechnya. Other details are definitely less believable. Yakha says she…

💯107🫡37😁30❤15✍8👍7😍1

18 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC≈11,200 views302 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁238👍22❤18🫡13🗿4🤔4😈3

18 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈23,700 views400 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

"Sir, the war hasn't even started yet"

😁345🗿19🤔15💯9🤯8❤2😱2

18 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC≈13,000 views259 reactionsread 27 September 2026

There are two things that, for some reason, no one seems particularly interested in calculating anymore. First, there is almost no reliable information on Ukrainian losses. Second, Western aid figures have stopped being tallied as a single total There's a good reason for that: the combined figure has now exceeded $500 billion. By comparison, the American Lend-Lease program to the USSR during WWII amounted to about $…

💯208❤21👍18🤔9🔥1🫡1😁1

17 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC≈7,900 views452 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Quite apt that Lindsey Graham's bill was named "Sanctions From Hell", because that's exactly where he is right now.

😁282💯118👍22🔥15💅12🤬2❤1

16 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC≈6,740 views273 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

squad goals

😁145🫡83🔥22😍11👍8💯3🌭1

16 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC≈7,180 views150 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Looks like the Yemenis weren't lying about downing a Saudi jet today.

🫡108❤18👍15👏4🎉3🌭1🔥1

14 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈8,550 views286 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

You know how pretty much everyone is convinced that the Russian electoral and parliamentary system is fake, right. Well, duh. But there are two important points. First, if it's fake, and Putin is running a "turbo-giga-hyper-dictatorship", why bother spending billions on fake elections and political parties? Before 2022, and especially before 2014, the liberal answer would have been: "umm they're just trying to decei…

❤117💯92🗿23🤔22👍19🔥7👎6

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @rwapodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rwapodcast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Intel Slava
@intelslava · 390,258
#1
Slavyangrad
@Slavyangrad · 113,042
#2
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 191,018
#3
Geroman
@geromanat · 17,147
#4
Scott Ritter
@ScottRitter · 86,847
#5
The Right People Z
@the_Right_People · 36,432
#6
Rybar in English
@rybar_in_english · 77,697
#7
Ukraine Watch
@ukraine_watch · 68,938
#8
Two Majors - English Channel
@two_majors · 47,334
#9
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,949
#10
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
@AussieCossack · 68,753
#11
Victor vicktop55
@vicktop55 · 26,809
#12
Cyberspec News
@CyberspecNews · 16,615
#13
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 292,236
#14
Eurasia & Multipolarity
@EurasianChoice · 24,066
#15
Foreign Agent Intel
@ForeignAgentIntel · 31,099
#16
🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺
@RussianBaZa · 20,218
#17
Defense Politics Asia
@defensepoliticsasia · 8,818
#18
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
@brianlovethailand · 40,969
#19
Patrick Lancaster News Today
@patricklancasternewstoday · 40,339
#20
Russian Head
@russianhead · 12,016
#21
🇮🇪 Chay Bowes, The Irishman in Russia 🇷🇺
@irishmaninrussia · 12,191
#22
From Russia with Love ❤️
@fr0m_Russia_with_L0ve · 8,451
#23
InfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,336
#24
The Dark Troll
@the_dark_troll · 365
#25
ZradaXXII
@ZradaXXII · 5,293
#26
Lord Of War
@llordofwar · 17,996
#27
Soroca-Beloboca
@soroka_belaya_en · 7,172
#28
RT Documentary
@militarywave · 41,264
#29
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 33,119
#30
Tim Kirby Russia Hardcore
@timkirbyhardcore · 6,595
#31
The Real Politick with Mark Sleboda
@TheRealPolitick · 8,904
#32
IDpublicENG
@InfoDefenseEn · 5,255
#33
Chronicles Of The Conflict
@ConflictChronicles · 18,174
#34
Intel Republic
@Intel_Republic12 · 96,729
#35
UKR LEAKS_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng · 75,501
#36
Lord Bebo & Friends
@myLordBebo · 72,798
#37
ZOKA's Channel
@zoka200 · 17,826
#38
MoD Russia
@mod_russia_en · 94,662
#39
Masnova
@Novichok_Rossiya_2 · 5,006
#40
База from Olga
@BazaFromOlga · 5,744
#41
World Pravda
@worldpravda · 53,777
#42
Pepe Escobar
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,315
#43
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 115,278
#44
Fearless John - @European_dissident
@European_dissident · 70,052
#45
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,285
#46
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 404,635
#47
Military Summary
@militarysummary · 77,306
#48
The Islander
@TheIslanderNews · 61,835
#49
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 321,989
#50
🇷🇺IL RUSSO🇷🇺
@i20028843 · 13,716
#51
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА
@arx_spn · 1,028,205
#52
Global News Monitor
@warmonitors · 152,372
#53
AMK Mapping
@AMK_Mapping · 58,716
#54
Putinger's Cat / Кот Путингера
@putingers_cat · 11,535
#55
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel
@sitreports · 23,026
#56
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 615,168
#57
Remylind23
@remylind21 · 11,305
#58
Inessa S ️️
@InessaFromYoutube · 14,019
#59
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 745,026
#60
Sonar21
@sonar_21 · 10,867
#61
DIVGEN 🚩 Карта СВО
@divgen · 75,995
#62
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 122,253
#63
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 491,085
#64
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 116,030
#65
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 664,441
#66
Analyst Intel
@Anlystintel · 3,461
#67
TheNebulator
@thenebulator · 3,182
#68
Бункер Гриши Путина (GrishaPutin)
@GrishaPutin · 11,697
#69
Russian MFA 🇷🇺
@MFARussia · 54,489
#70
Russian Diplomat 🅉
@R_Diplomat · 20,121
#71
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 473,335
#72
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 114,627
#73
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#74
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,032
#75
Mediterranean Man
@medmannews · 76,827
#76
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 170,796
#77
ANNA NEWS
@anna_news · 233,975
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Patrick Lancaster News Today
@patricklancasternewstoday · 40,339
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Victor vicktop55
@vicktop55 · 26,809
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Scott Ritter
@ScottRitter · 86,847
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
The Right People Z
@the_Right_People · 36,432
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 390,258
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
@AussieCossack · 68,753
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Rybar in English
@rybar_in_english · 77,697
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,949
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Slavyangrad
@Slavyangrad · 113,042
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Foreign Agent Intel
@ForeignAgentIntel · 31,099
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
@brianlovethailand · 40,969
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity
@EurasianChoice · 24,066
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Suriyakmaps
@Suriyak_maps · 47,079
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Ukraine Watch
@ukraine_watch · 68,938
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Two Majors - English Channel
@two_majors · 47,334
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
@NewResistance · 28,378
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 191,018
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 33,119
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,951
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng · 75,501
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
AMK Mapping
@AMK_Mapping · 58,716
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
MoD Russia
@mod_russia_en · 94,662
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
Military Summary
@militarysummary · 77,306
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Multipolar Market
@multipolarmarket · 27,551
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Russians With Attitude” (@rwapodcast), 36,686 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rwapodcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.