📄 Senior US Democratic senators urge administration to preserve Nvidia export records amid China security concerns Senior Democratic senators are pressing the administration to retain records tied to Nvidia export records as concerns grow over chip sales to China and possible security implications. The headline points to a formal effort to preserve documentation rather than announce a new enforcement action. Operat…

Channel
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel
@sitreports
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,851subscribers
-339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001426514777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sitreports |
| Description | AI, technology, mass surveillance, and intelligence — everything you need to know about tomorrow. |
| Created | 11 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sitreports |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 07:16 | 22,851 | -11 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 22,862 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:54 | 22,869 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:18 | 22,874 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:10 | 22,877 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:31 | 22,884 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 22,879 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:18 | 22,883 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:19 | 22,887 | -4 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 22,891 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 22,897 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 22,899 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 22,906 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 22,911 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 22,914 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 22,923 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 22,934 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 22,939 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 22,941 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 22,945 | first reading |
Engagement
522 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.68%
- avg views ÷ 22,851 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 384
- 105 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 105
- of 522 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 522 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 40,343 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,700
- Videos
- ≈9,790
- Links
- ≈23,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 16s
- Average length
- 1m 08s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 105 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🤖 Nvidia drama revives chip export ban debate The latest dispute around Nvidia has brought chip export controls back into focus, centering renewed scrutiny on how advanced semiconductors are regulated and where policy lines are being drawn. For OSINT watchers, this matters because export bans sit at the intersection of industrial policy, supply chains, and strategic technology denial. Any renewed debate signals pre…
🔍 Cyberattacks hit a third of Japan firms or their service providers this year A Reuters survey indicates that about one-third of Japanese firms were affected this year by cyberattacks targeting either their own networks or those of external service providers. The headline points to a broad exposure pattern spanning both direct intrusions and supply-chain-linked incidents. Operationally, the key signal is that thir…
🎭 OpenAI security team drawn into Ukraine prank call Three senior OpenAI officials, including national security policy chief Sasha Baker, were reportedly tricked by Russian prank duo Vovan and Lexus after the pair posed as Ukrainian officials. In a recorded 17-minute call detailed by The Intercept, the officials discussed military AI support for Ukraine, Pentagon contacts, and work tied to the Daybreak Blue model. …
📡 Yandex confirms data loss after datacenter strikes Russian cloud provider Yandex says drone attacks on its datacenters led to customer data loss. The company states it restored over 97 percent of customer data, implying 2.84 percent was lost due to critical hardware damage and missing backups on the platform. It has now enabled VM backups by default and launched a new availability zone, ru-central1-f, with resourc…
🔍 Maersk confirms breach tied to legacy logistics platform Maersk says attackers breached systems at an acquired company and stole data from a local system linked to the former LF Logistics platform. The company says no operational disruption is expected, current evidence shows no sensitive data was disclosed, and its incident notice says APIs and EDI links were not impacted. WhiteArmor is demanding $5 million and c…
🔍 eMudhra revokes 8 more intermediate CA certificates Certificate authority eMudhra revoked eight additional intermediate CA certificates after finding its 2025 key-transfer script mishandled RSA private keys outside HSM protection. The action raises the total impacted intermediates to 16, after eight earlier ECDSA keys were found reducible to a single byte in an incident report. Some revoked RSA intermediates had i…
🔍 eBPF Rootkits Move From Research to Underground Tradecraft A sponsored eBPF rootkits write-up highlights forum tutorials and shared code for Linux implants using kernel-supported BPF interfaces instead of loadable kernel modules. Documented techniques include process hiding via getdents64 hooks, packet-triggered activation, XDP-based traffic inspection, and filtering tied to antivirus-linked IP lists. Operational…
🤖 AntiFox AI agents tied to AWS credential theft Attackers are using Alibaba Cloud-hosted instances of AntiFox, an open-source agentic pentesting platform, in intrusions targeting web services and AWS environments. Observed activity included webshell deployment on exposed IIS servers, credential validation, configuration discovery, AWS API abuse with valid IAM users and EC2 roles, and in some cases access to product…
📡 Active ScreenConnect campaign hits MSP environments ConnectWise and Huntress are tracking an active intrusion set abusing compromised ScreenConnect environments to push rogue remote-access clients onto customer devices. Huntress has identified 6 compromised MSPs, 286 affected endpoints, and impact across 47 organizations, while ConnectWise disabled five third-party ScreenConnect extensions in roughly 400 partner e…
📄 Hegseth reissues counter-drone memo with legal chain corrected Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a corrected copy of a Nov. 5 counter-drone memorandum directing Pentagon components to log any delay or denial in employing C-UAS tools as a “risk of inaction” and report cases to JIATF-401. The update removes references to a Deputy General Counsel for DRPM Programs and reroutes completed legal reviews through JIAT…
🔍 German military bans commercially available Chinese drones Germany’s military has reportedly imposed an immediate ban on commercially available Chinese-made drones at barracks and training grounds, with Der Spiegel citing security concerns. The measure applies to off-the-shelf systems rather than bespoke military platforms. The move reflects a force-protection and counterintelligence posture around training areas…
Showing the 12 most recent of 522 posts we hold for @sitreports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Slavyangrad · 111,501#1
@DDGeopolitics · 189,792#2
@TheIslanderNews · 61,566#3
@geopolitics_prime · 288,752#4
@European_dissident · 69,176#5
@myLordBebo · 71,977#6
@infodefENGLAND · 50,367#7
@militarywave · 41,230#8
@americanmajority · 26,025#9
@rybar_in_english · 77,317#10
@geo_grandmasters · 76,097#11
@ForeignAgentIntel · 30,898#12
@EurasianChoice · 23,516#13
@wartimedia · 7,435#14
@irishmaninrussia · 12,269#15
@defensepoliticsasia · 8,654#16
@brianlovethailand · 40,678#17
@TheRealPolitick · 8,721#18
@patricklancasternewstoday · 39,596#19
@Intel_Republic12 · 94,200#20
@intelslava · 385,254#21
@ukraine_watch · 69,160#22
@two_majors · 47,608#23
@ukr_leaks_eng · 74,944#24
@worldpravda · 53,476#25
@middle_east_spectator · 396,246#26
@medmannews · 76,608#27
@mod_russia_en · 93,800#28
@AussieCossack · 70,529#29
@R_Diplomat · 19,764#30
@ScottRitter · 85,667#31
@kalibrated · 33,420#32
@rnintel · 160,265#33
@militarysummary · 76,966#34
@CIG_telegram · 114,525#35
@ConflictChronicles · 17,829#36
@multipolarmarket · 26,781#37
@Suriyak_maps · 48,151#38
@the_Right_People · 36,771#39
@RussianBaZa · 20,594#40
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,007#41
@node_of_time_en · 19,830#42
@russianhead · 11,819#43
@thedurancom · 51,335#44
@warmonitors · 149,719#45
@globaldissident · 8,277#46
@sonar_21 · 10,912#47
@fr0m_Russia_with_L0ve · 8,432#48
@i20028843 · 13,457#49
@LebUpdate · 75,673#50
@CyberspecNews · 16,431#51
@informador_global · 28,671#52
@llordofwar · 17,808#53
@BazaFromOlga · 5,704#54
@africaintel · 16,605#55
@Anlystintel · 3,425#56
@thecradlemedia · 55,615#57
@presstv · 92,650#58
@asianomics · 6,785#59
@soroka_belaya_en · 6,979#60
@vicktop55 · 26,866#61
@heilukraine1959 · 15,263#62
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,443#63
@dannyhaiphong · 18,314#64
@rwapodcast · 36,163#65
@no_mainstreamW · 3,056#66
@ZradaXXII · 5,201#67
@zoka200 · 17,919#68
@News_of_Donbass · 19,056#69
@BABalMANDAB · 6,289#70
@militaernews · 64,756#71
@FiorellaInMoscow · 12,180#72
@AMK_Mapping · 61,326#73
@NabrezhnyeIntel · 2,776#74
@BellumActaNews · 107,007#75
@rvvoenkor · 1,451,986#76
@boris_rozhin · 750,635#77
@TXDPR · 15,962#78
@Novichok_Rossiya_2 · 4,951#79
@arx_spn · 1,018,125#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@militarywave · 41,230
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
@ForeignAgentIntel · 30,898
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@patricklancasternewstoday · 39,596
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
@infodefENGLAND · 50,367
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
@TheIslanderNews · 61,566
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@European_dissident · 69,176
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@americanmajority · 26,025
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
@geopolitics_prime · 288,752
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@rybar_in_english · 77,317
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@EurasianChoice · 23,516
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
@myLordBebo · 71,977
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@Slavyangrad · 111,501
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@multipolarmarket · 26,781
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
@geo_grandmasters · 76,097
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
@brianlovethailand · 40,678
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
@ukr_leaks_eng · 74,944
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@DDGeopolitics · 189,792
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@AussieCossack · 70,529
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
@mod_russia_en · 93,800
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@militaernews · 64,756
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
@the_Right_People · 36,771
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
@R_Diplomat · 19,764
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
@ukraine_watch · 69,160
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@RussianBaZa · 20,594
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel” (@sitreports), 22,851 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitreports.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.