Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Scott Ritter

@ScottRitter

Has discussion group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

87,876subscribers

-166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372187076
TypeChannel
Username@ScottRitter
Created29 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ScottRitter

Growth

87,87688,04287,9596 August 2026 — 88,042 subscribers7 August 2026 — 88,018 subscribers7 August 2026 — 88,010 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87,982 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 87,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 87,915 subscribers11 August 2026 — 87,901 subscribers12 August 2026 — 87,876 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,851–88,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:0387,876-25
11 Aug 2026, 20:1287,901-14
10 Aug 2026, 23:3787,915-29
10 Aug 2026, 19:3787,944no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:3587,944-38
9 Aug 2026, 01:3087,982-28
7 Aug 2026, 23:5188,010-8
7 Aug 2026, 01:5088,018-24
6 Aug 2026, 09:4288,042first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 11 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 107,881 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 295,285
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlsonNetwork · 213,230
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 191,636
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,851
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 395,638
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Global News Monitor
@warmonitors · 155,545
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 385,979
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
GAZA NOW IN ENGLISH
@gazaalanpa · 178,655
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 170,905
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 178,397
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scott Ritter” (@ScottRitter), 87,876 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScottRitter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.