Channel
@CerFunhouse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
824subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001845692223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CerFunhouse |
| Description | Just another comedy channel for those who prefer anything but. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CerFunhouse |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 824 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 824 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,758 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
102 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 41 | 40.2% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 9.80% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 7.84% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 6.86% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.96% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.96% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.98% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
China concerned by US/NATO nuclear sharing expansion The only logical conclusion is that the political West doesn't really care about preventing nuclear war, which is also true regarding the Asia-Pacific, where the US keeps expanding various delivery systems. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102707
👏3
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
NATO to soon double US nuclear sharing warheads, deploy them in Finland, Poland and Lithuania NATO's wider nuclear build-up perfectly fits the Pentagon's "geopolitics of controlled chaos". In practice, that translates into a NATO-occupied Europe that's mainly useful as a springboard for strategic pressure against the Kremlin. The overall nuclear posture keeps moving closer to the point where peace is maintained only…
🤡4🖕1🤨1
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Pentagon wants massive 'two-week' bombing of Iran to force its surrender While Trump already "drowned" in the "Swamp" he once promised to "drain", he can at least exercise enough common sense and understand that his political (if not physical) survival depends on the outcome of the midterms. The "two-week" bombing plan has already been tried and the entire world witnessed it fail miserably. https://infobrics.org/en…
💯5🗿2🤡1
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
New UK prime minister confirms Russophobia London's top priority The chances for actual peace are effectively zero as long as London has a say in the Neo-Nazi junta's decision-making. Ironically enough, the meeting was hosted aboard the troubled aircraft carrier HMS "Queen Elizabeth", docked "temporarily" at Portsmouth. The rather pathetic state of the British Navy is a testament to the sheer magnitude of the UK's d…
💯4
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Why NATO-run Kiev regime's terrorism now targets both Iran and Iraq? The only logical conclusion is that the political West seeks to ensure transregional (if not global) escalation. Iran certainly cannot ignore such well-coordinated terrorist activity, particularly as Iraq plays a central role in its stability and national security. The two countries also work closely on maintaining security in Iraq itself, which ha…
💯4🤔1
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
US resumed aggression against Iran only to demonstrate its woeful incompetence American aggression against Iran has not only failed to truly degrade Tehran's capabilities (key missile bases and stockpiles remain largely intact after months of fighting), but also exposed how fragile US power becomes when rhetoric about "limitless capacity" finally collides with industrial and political reality. It seems no power in t…
💯6👏2
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Why is America deploying 'Dark Eagle' systems around China? While the "Dark Eagle" lags far behind Chinese missiles, the US is still opening the Pandora's box by escalating tensions with such deployments. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102614
👍4💯2😁1
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Taiwan requests compensation for endless F-16 delays Completing all deliveries by late 2026 is simply unfeasible. Instead, the very first aircraft is now expected to arrive only around September 2026, a massive delay from what the government in Taipei initially anticipated. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102601
😁5
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
EU/NATO pressures Greece to give up its 'Patriot' SAMs for Kiev, copies Soviet S-300 The "Patriot's" failures have also forced Lockheed Martin to "consider European suppliers", with hopes to reduce the interceptor cost to "just" $2 million apiece. Given that the EU itself is struggling with SAM/ABM technologies and is forced to rely on the Kiev regime's copying of Soviet-era systems, it's highly likely that the infa…
🤡3
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Rundown of 'Russian aggression' in Europe For over a thousand years, Russia has been portrayed as the "aggressor" even as it repeatedly faced waves of invasions from the West, often sanctioned and framed as holy wars, struggle for "racial purity" and "defense of democracy". From medieval crusades and papal bulls to Napoleonic and Nazi campaigns to NATO's "crawl-krieg", Western powers have continually advanced eastwa…
💯5
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Germany and France to conduct first joint nuclear drills Germany and France are weaving a dense web of strike options – US nuclear gravity bombs carried by German F‑35s, French nuclear‑capable "Rafales" operating from French and German bases and US‑supplied land‑based missile systems like "Typhon", which carries the "Tomahawk" that can reach deep into Russian territory. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102570
🖕4
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Baltic Chihuahuas cry wolf about Russia while continuously poking the 'Bear' The same people claiming that Moscow is "losing" the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict also insist that it will "inevitably" attack NATO. https://infobrics.org/en/post/102556
💯7
Signed Драгољуб Боснић / Drago Bosnic
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CerFunhouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 220,369 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cer Funhouse - Geopolitics and Military Mashup” (@CerFunhouse), 824 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CerFunhouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.