International news — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,998–75,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:37
75,029
-41
16 Sept 2026, 02:40
75,070
-60
14 Sept 2026, 06:19
75,130
-8
12 Sept 2026, 15:21
75,138
+64
10 Sept 2026, 11:16
75,074
-115
7 Sept 2026, 08:15
75,189
+56
4 Sept 2026, 15:37
75,133
-11
2 Sept 2026, 22:17
75,144
-27
1 Sept 2026, 22:26
75,171
-32
31 Aug 2026, 20:12
75,203
-5
30 Aug 2026, 23:07
75,208
-4
29 Aug 2026, 20:13
75,212
+43
28 Aug 2026, 19:42
75,169
+22
27 Aug 2026, 17:02
75,147
-22
26 Aug 2026, 13:53
75,169
-6
25 Aug 2026, 15:35
75,175
-46
24 Aug 2026, 15:39
75,221
-13
22 Aug 2026, 22:14
75,234
+131
21 Aug 2026, 11:05
75,103
-5
20 Aug 2026, 08:48
75,108
first reading
Engagement
170 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.70%
avg views ÷ 75,029 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,020
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 170 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
170 (3 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
537,510
Reactions total
8,371
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,930
Videos
≈8,630
Links
≈10,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24m 46s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,981 reactions across 169 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,669
20.6%
🤣
2,626
20.2%
👍
1,579
12.2%
🤬
1,289
9.93%
🤡
1,067
8.22%
🔥
983
7.57%
👏
765
5.89%
🤔
508
3.91%
💯
505
3.89%
💩
307
2.36%
✍
238
1.83%
👎
178
1.37%
🤯
64
0.493%
🤷♂
63
0.485%
🫡
49
0.377%
🌚
25
0.193%
👀
22
0.169%
⚡
20
0.154%
😱
19
0.146%
🙏
5
0.039%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,981 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 169 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @geo_grandmasters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 170 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇪🇺🇬🇧The UK left the EU, but the EU never left the UK.
Trump decided not to strike the Houthis, when Saudi Arabia asked for help. So naturally, Britain stepped in to "save the day".
The Royal Air Force will send a Voyager tanker to refuel Saudi warplanes in the air for several weeks
Meanwhile, the UK and the EU are already scrambling for jet fuel, with imports from South Korea hitting a four-year high and inventori…
🧊As the ice melts, the Arctic is revealing more and more 'goodies'
Trump is finally getting his Greenland deal, that gives the US a much bigger footprint on the island. But securing it is another story, because the melting ice is slowly turning what was once inaccessible into something everyone wants a piece of.
⛏️The region has an enormous resource base:
🟣The Arctic may contain around 90 billion barrels of undisc…
What has always made Hungary so attractive is its willingness, and, most importantly, power of will to prioritise its own interests:
✔️Hungary has fought mandatory EU "multiculturalism" schemes and pushed for tighter border control.
✔️Hungary has been resisting to phasing out cheap Russian energy for a long time, arguing that Hungarians would end up paying the bill.
✔️Hungary has been putting veto on fast-tracking…
Ukraine’s FM is apparently "surprised" that Hungary doesn’t want to join yet another grand... “initiative”, so-called the Carpathian Eight.
No words can describe the Hungarian PM’s shock to find out that his country is "a part of an international initiative" he never agreed to join 😂
"Just to give you an example: Hi, we have formed a football team in the next village. We don’t know each other, but you are in it, an…
🚨🤖Humans are training their own replacements
Pronto’s opt-in camera initiative represents a troubling convergence of domestic labor and advanced robotics training. Across India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, thousands of workers and homemakers are strapping head-mounted cameras to their heads to film everyday chores like cooking, cleaning, folding laundry, and washing dishes. This first-person footage provides invaluabl…
🇨🇳🇺🇸US transactional ambiguity raises the stakes for Taiwan amid the AI race with China
President Xi Jinping arrives in the US September 23–25 for talks with Trump, the latest chapter in managing the planet’s most consequential rivalry amid trade wars, tech arms races, Taiwan flashpoints, and eroding trust. However, preparatory sessions already floated limited non-sensitive deals and a tariff-truce extension rather …
Meet Neil Hop, the chargé d'Affaires of the US embassy in Yemen (effectively Washington’s top diplomat on Yemen-related matters at the moment).
Looks like someone dragged this dude out of bed in the middle of the night (and in the middle of Houthi successes) and told him: “Camera’s on. Say something.”
The only thing Neil Hop seems to have had within reach was a speech for the 250th anniversary of American independe…
🪖🇮🇷Is Iran teaching a new generation to ‘sacrifice their lives’?
Iran’s new mobilisation campaign, Janfada, roughly translated as “those who sacrifice their lives for Iran”, held its first public “military exercise” on Friday.
IRGC chief says over 600,000 people have registered and more than a million could eventually receive training.
The interesting part is teenagers carrying assault rifles that appeared during …
🇮🇳 📁 Explore this finest catalogue to discover best Telegram channels covering a wide range of topics! Stay updated on live events, and dive into the latest discussions on geopolitics, finance, culture, and more.
👉 🇮🇳 CHANNELS
🇬🇱 Monday catch-up: Denmark and Greenland gave ground, Trump got his foothold
After months of threatening to annex Greenland, Trump has now secured a deal with Denmark and Greenland.
The island will not become American. However, the US is expected to secure permanent military access, overflight rights, and the opportunity to expand its presence there. The agreement will also prevent non-NATO powers from establishin…
🇩🇪 Monday catch-up: Merz’s CDU got wrecked at the polls this weekend. Twice
Germany held state elections in two federal states on Sunday, and the results are worth mentioning:
🔘In Berlin, the ruling party was pushed into second place by the far-left Die Linke: 25.3% against the CDU’s 19%
🟠In Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, the far-right AfD came first with 38.3%. Merz’s CDU managed just 4.9%.
And the best part is …
🧠😊 Can a robot write a symphony? It sure can trigger a nuclear crisis
Chinese and American security experts are now discussing something that sounds like a Cold War-era nuclear arms-control agreement — red lines for military AI.
The fear is explainable, as AI technologies become increasingly integrated into military operations, an autonomous system could easily interfere with nuclear command networks or launch a cy…
❤29👍13🤯7🤬4⚡3🔥2🤔2✍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @geo_grandmasters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Foreign policy goals of the Pact's members are too different to provide joint actions52%
Turkey and Pakistan be ghosting Saudi26%
The generals are too busy choosing the alliance logo12%
Netanyahu cut the phone lines14%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A common BRICS currency: solution or bigger headache?
This is exactly what BRICS needs27%
Yes, but only with a BRICS central bank37%
No, the economies are too different24%
It would end up being yuan 2.024%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How would you prefer to read Grandmasters of Geopolitics?
Short posts with the key facts35%
Medium-length posts with some context39%
Detailed analysis and deep dives50%
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Resonant News 📰 @ResonantNews · 21,845 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
Politics UnTold @PoliticsUntold · 24,718 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 15 September 2026
𝗠𝗘𝗚𝗛 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗦 @MeghUpdates · 82,431 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 292,236 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
OsntTV 📺️ @OsntTV · 46,418 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
MyGov Newsdesk @MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 376,966 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Lord Bebo & Friends @myLordBebo · 72,856 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Scott Ritter @ScottRitter · 86,847 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 25,303 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Multipolar Market @multipolarmarket · 27,551 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Foreign Agent Intel @ForeignAgentIntel · 31,099 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 97,046 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Major Madhan Kumar MMK @majormadhankumarmmk · 30,742 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
The Islander @TheIslanderNews · 61,835 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Defence Squad @DSquadOfficial · 83,094 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
AIM CIVILS @aimcivilservices · 30,674 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Gaurav Pradhan Gurukul 🇮🇳 @DGPIndia · 90,693 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,128 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Current Affairs @Upsc_Prelims_Current_Affairs_PDF · 352,919 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 70,220 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 113,042 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Hindustan Times- Official Channel @hindustantimes · 63,334 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Gharkekalesh @gharkekaleshh · 74,399 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 91 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grandmasters of Geopolitics” (@geo_grandmasters), 75,029 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geo_grandmasters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.