International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,863–34,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 09:20
33,901
-81
17 Sept 2026, 17:18
33,982
-7
15 Sept 2026, 13:40
33,989
-14
14 Sept 2026, 00:39
34,003
-5
12 Sept 2026, 03:56
34,008
+30
9 Sept 2026, 20:20
33,978
-27
6 Sept 2026, 14:59
34,005
-41
4 Sept 2026, 04:00
34,046
-22
2 Sept 2026, 17:43
34,068
-18
1 Sept 2026, 13:05
34,086
-12
31 Aug 2026, 09:34
34,098
-12
30 Aug 2026, 06:33
34,110
-10
29 Aug 2026, 08:06
34,120
-17
28 Aug 2026, 08:04
34,137
+1
27 Aug 2026, 05:54
34,136
+13
26 Aug 2026, 02:23
34,123
+165
25 Aug 2026, 05:09
33,958
-14
24 Aug 2026, 00:11
33,972
-17
22 Aug 2026, 10:38
33,989
-9
20 Aug 2026, 22:52
33,998
first reading
Engagement
441 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 33,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,200
237 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
242
of 441 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
441 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
994,954
Reactions total
27,933
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,300
Videos
≈5,900
Links
≈1,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32m 33s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
57,866 reactions across 433 posts, in 71 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,906
18.8%
🔥
8,847
15.3%
👍
8,327
14.4%
🤣
6,425
11.1%
😁
5,910
10.2%
🤡
2,524
4.36%
💯
2,071
3.58%
👏
1,425
2.46%
🤬
1,078
1.86%
🎉
893
1.54%
🤔
845
1.46%
🥰
754
1.30%
🫡
702
1.21%
🍾
618
1.07%
🤮
615
1.06%
🖕
580
1.00%
🏆
521
0.9%
🥱
462
0.798%
👀
348
0.601%
😢
331
0.572%
51 further kinds
3,684
6.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 433 of the 441 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,866 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 441 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 NEW: At least some of the missiles fired tonight into the Strait of Hormuz carried naval mines
Iran is once again laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, this time apparently in the illegal Omani route.
It is unclear how many of such mines were launched by Iran, and if their deployment was successful.
@Middle_East_Spectator
—❗️🇮🇷/🇺🇸 BREAKING: In the past few hours, the IRGC Navy has begun substantially escalating its targeting of violating vessels in the Strait of Hormuz
Anti-ship cruise missiles and drones were launched at various vessels. Simultaneously, fast-attack boats of the IRGC Navy are engaging hostile tankers with guided rockets, Dushka machine guns, and small arms.
According to reliable reports, at least 3 vessels have been…
Idk what the fuck these guys are talking about, Zoka has been so good on red maps.
He even rang the bell on Lyman direction nearly the same time AMK and I did.
This is mapper bias btw, if it doesn’t match their map it’s considered wrong.
I don't think Zoka doesn't know how to use Sentinel. There are simply different ways of interpreting the data. Furthermore, Sentinel data from May through October is more difficult to interpret due to the increase in wildfires during those months.
I’ve had this conversation with so many mappers and people who cover this war.
What the fuck does it matter if Ukrainians go on the offensive and retake territory?
27,000 casualties per month people. More when you expose your infantry to assaults. I get that red on map is good and blue on map is bad. But honest to god just step back and look at the math equation that’s playing out.
If Ukraine was actually successf…
I don’t know what’s worse, Vostok’s downfall or Zapad still sucking after 4 years of conflict.
😭66🤔8🤡5🙈5👾3❤2👍1🤣1
Signed Scott
Showing the 12 most recent of 441 posts we hold for @kalibrated. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@kalibrated edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AMK Mapping @AMK_Mapping · 59,757 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
The Defender Dome @DefenderDome · 21,482 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,018 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Suriyakmaps @Suriyak_maps · 47,079 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 404,635 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Tabz - Live News @tabzlive · 66,427 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Our Wars, Today @ourwarstoday · 46,938 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
War Noir @war_noir · 53,385 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
DamnedHistory⚡️ @Damhistory · 21,286 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
Victor vicktop55 @vicktop55 · 26,809 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Islamic World News @iswnews_en · 20,983 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
JHArnous @jharnous · 26,744 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Vanessa Beeley @VanessaBeeley · 21,983 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
Enemy Watch — Official @enemywatch · 29,035 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,949 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 390,258 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,334 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 292,236 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,336 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity @EurasianChoice · 24,066 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,777 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 25,303 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
War Leaks 18+ (Channel) @warleaks11 · 68,456 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kalibrated” (@kalibrated), 33,901 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kalibrated.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.