8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,584–16,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
16,588
-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:51
16,591
-2
10 Aug 2026, 02:41
16,593
-12
8 Aug 2026, 23:22
16,605
-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:26
16,607
-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:51
16,609
-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:30
16,613
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:29
16,613
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.45%
avg views ÷ 16,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
905
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
21,714
Reactions total
676
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,510
Videos
≈3,590
Links
≈4,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 49s
Average length
2m 27s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
629 reactions across 22 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
113
18.0%
💯
93
14.8%
❤
84
13.4%
🔥
73
11.6%
🤬
68
10.8%
👍
51
8.11%
😭
30
4.77%
🫡
21
3.34%
😢
18
2.86%
💔
16
2.54%
💊
14
2.23%
❤🔥
12
1.91%
😁
12
1.91%
😱
5
0.795%
🤔
3
0.477%
🌚
2
0.318%
👎
2
0.318%
👏
2
0.318%
🤨
2
0.318%
🤷
2
0.318%
6 further kinds
6
0.954%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I am sure that our peoples must be together, and all the negative moments, either made by someone's mistakes or by someone doing it in purpose, cut my heart with a knife. I can't help sharing that Nazi grandson's question because it underlined that those Nazis are still here wanting to finish with us all. And better we get together against those Nazis. And you know what? I'm sure that Nazi has children and grandchild…
Обыкновенный фашизм от немецкого "журналиста"
Немецкий "журналист" Михаэль Мартенс из газеты "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung", в своем вопросе о том, как Германия может помочь убивать больше русских, повторял директиву Адольфа Гитлера.
В директиве, адресованной Альфреду Розенбергу от 23 июля 1942 года, касающейся реализации "Генерального плана "Восток", Адольф Гитлер написал:
"С военной точки зрения, мы должны уби…
"Скажите нам, европейцы, что мы можем сделать, чтобы помочь вам убить больше русских?"
Это не сцена из голливудского фильма. Это немецкий журналист Михаэль Мартенс из газеты Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, задающий Зеленскому вопрос о том, как европейцы могут помочь ему убить больше русских, на совместной пресс-конференции. Сербский президент Александр Вучич даже не смог скрыть своего изумления.
Я не часто теряюсь …
Ordinary Fascism from the German "journalist"
German "journalist" Michael Martens of the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung", in his asking how Germany can help killing more Russians, was repeating the directive of Adolf Hitler.
In a directive to Alfred Rosenberg dated 23 July 1942 concerning the implementation of Generalplan Ost, Adolf Hitler wrote:
“Speaking militarily, we must kill three to four million Russians e…
Early in the morning, the Ukrops attacked a passenger bus in the Petrovsky district of Donetsk. Miraculously, the driver survived, but he was wounded.
https://t.me/VESTIDONETSK/21947
Привет, друзья. Много сообщений в личку, поэтому отвечаю всем здесь.
Сегодня прошло апелляционное судебное заседание, но не по двум вопросам, стоявшим на повестке, а только по одному. По второму перенесли, снова 😡 - на 14 августа. Объясню всё позже, потому что сейчас плохо себя чувствую. Явное затягивание процесса выбесило даже тех, кто принимает решение, а моё сердце сегодня уже не выдержало, и после судебного засе…
Aiden Minnis:
"🇬🇧 It may be the country of my birth, but not my ancestry. I swore an allegiance to Russia, not the United Kingdom.
I'll say it once again. This flag represents centuries of oppression, murder, theft, endless lies, and absolute indecency.
Child abuse, rape, more murder, and genocide of peoples.
Starting wars and destroying cultures all over the globe.
The English have been causing trouble throughou…
Хорошая статья для тех, кто грезит сносом мавзолея Ленина и всех памятников ему в России, беря пример с бандеровцев.
Ярослав Листов, историк:
"У предательства своего народа нет срока давности и прощения
80 лет назад, 1 августа 1946 года, во дворе Бутырской тюрьмы был приведён в исполнение приговор Военной коллегии Верховного Суда СССР. К смертной казни через повешение приговорили 12 бывших советских генералов и оф…
A good article for those who dream of demolishing Lenin's mausoleum and all the monuments to him in Russia, following the example of Bandera.
Yaroslav Listov, a historian:
"Betrayal of one's own people has no statute of limitations and no forgiveness.
80 years ago, on August 1, 1946, the verdict of the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR was carried out in the courtyard of the Butyrskaya prison. 12…
3 августа 2026 года НАТО/укро нацисты совершили массовое убийство русских мирных граждан, включая детей, отдыхавших на побережье Чёрного моря в Геленджике. Царствие небесное всем убитым ☦ 🕯️🙏🥀🥀
🚨🇷🇺 Ukrainian drone strike kills 7, 3 of them are children, injures 47 in Russia’s Gelendzhik
💬 "Unfortunately, the death toll in the village of Arkhipo-Osipovka has risen to seven people, three of whom are children. At this very difficult moment, I express my sincere condolences to the families and loved ones," Governor of the Krasnodar region, Veniamin Kondratyev, said.
21 people were hospitalized following the a…
🤬17😭2❤1😁1😢1🙏1
Signed Lyudmila Bentley
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @TXDPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TXDPR edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 157,901 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TXDPR named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sputnikint named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russell TEXAS Bentley” (@TXDPR), 16,588 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TXDPR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
