Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -639. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,878–16,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 19:40
15,974
-15
8 Nov 2026, 08:57
15,989
-10
7 Nov 2026, 01:06
15,999
-3
6 Nov 2026, 03:39
16,002
-6
4 Nov 2026, 23:47
16,008
-10
4 Nov 2026, 01:25
16,018
-4
3 Nov 2026, 02:10
16,022
-6
2 Nov 2026, 01:41
16,028
-11
31 Oct 2026, 23:04
16,039
-2
30 Oct 2026, 22:05
16,041
-2
29 Oct 2026, 18:58
16,043
+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:15
16,042
-7
27 Oct 2026, 14:21
16,049
-4
26 Oct 2026, 17:39
16,053
-3
25 Oct 2026, 19:07
16,056
-11
24 Oct 2026, 19:57
16,067
-6
23 Oct 2026, 18:39
16,073
-9
22 Oct 2026, 21:20
16,082
-6
21 Oct 2026, 19:45
16,088
-11
20 Oct 2026, 12:15
16,099
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.24%
avg views ÷ 15,974 subscribers
Avg views / post
678
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
85 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
17,616
Reactions total
564
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,700
Videos
≈3,650
Links
≈5,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54m 36s
Average length
2m 06s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,961 reactions across 83 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
293
14.9%
❤
284
14.5%
🙏
275
14.0%
💯
169
8.62%
👍
153
7.80%
🔥
121
6.17%
❤🔥
106
5.41%
🫡
102
5.20%
😭
64
3.26%
💔
63
3.21%
😢
50
2.55%
💊
47
2.40%
😁
41
2.09%
🕊
24
1.22%
👏
20
1.02%
🤔
19
0.969%
🥰
16
0.816%
😱
14
0.714%
🐳
11
0.561%
👎
10
0.51%
17 further kinds
79
4.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,008 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (26.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Укро/НАТО нацисты бомбят Донецк ударными дронами. Прошу молитв.
С 2014 года бедный Донбасс атакуют демоны.
🙏🙏🙏
The Ukro/NATO Nazis are bombing Donetsk with attack drones. I ask for your prayers.
Since 2014, the poor Donbass has been under attack by those demons.
The Ukro/NATO Nazis 👹 bombed the Petrovsky district of Donetsk — they killed and injured civilians, destroyed their homes and the school where children go to get educated 😭
🥀🥀🥀🥀
Укро/НАТО нацисты 👹 бомбили Петровский район Донецка - убили и ранили мирных жителей, разрушили их дома и школу, куда дети учиться ходят 😭
The internet is abuzz with discussions about the appearance of German General Christian Freuding, who will take up the position of head of the German Armed Forces in 2027. Users write that he looks like a cloned Joseph Goebbels or like an actor playing a Nazi from World War II.
😱😱😱
В интернете бурно обсуждают внешность немецкого генерала Кристиана Фройдинга, который в 2027 году вступит в должность главы ВС ФРГ. Пол…
А шо там у европейцев?...
Немецкий депутат Европарламента Мартин Зоннеборн был настолько впечатлён автобиографией Кайи Каллас (первая женщина премьер-министр Эстонии, нынешний верховный представитель Европейского союза по иностранным делам и политике безопасности, а также заместитель председателя Еврокомиссии Урсулы фон дер Ляйен), что счёл нужным публично процитировать некоторые фразы из этой великой книги для демо…
7 ноября 1941 года прошел парад на Красной площади, откуда советские солдаты отправились защищать Москву.
"Пусть вдохновляет вас мужественный образ наших великих предков – Невского, Донского, Минина, Пожарского, Суворова и Кутузова!" – напутствовал красноармейцев с трибуны мавзолея Сталин.
Через месяц нацисты, имевшие до этого репутацию непобедимого противника, потерпели одно из первых поражений.
"Этот парад – одн…
On November 7, 1941, a parade was held on Red Square, from where Soviet soldiers went to defend Moscow.
"May the courageous image of our great ancestors – Nevsky, Donskoy, Minin, Pozharsky, Suvorov and Kutuzov inspire you!"
Stalin admonished the Red Army soldiers from the rostrum of the mausoleum.
A month later, the Nazis, who had previously had a reputation as an invincible opponent, suffered one of the first defe…
* "Азов" - нацисты и террористы, самый "цвет" которых наши ребята брали в Мариуполе, отдав за други своя много жизней, уничтожая реальных нацистов... А потом этих нацистов отпустили, подарили айфоны и тирамису...
Дениска, я не поняла, а чё ты ни слова не написал о ваших укропских Вансяцких, Иордановых, Агальцевых и Бажиных, которые живых людей пытают? А-а-а-а, я понимаю, неудобно, да. Тем более, что террорист Буданов проговорился, что таких пыточных домов у вас там до хрена. А тех, кто людей, ваших же, своих же! пытают, накажут? Посадят за это? Дениска, ты почему о ваших бедных жертвах пыток не беспокоишься, а?! Почему не под…
🔥15💯11👏8❤🔥3❤2💊1
Signed Lyudmila Bentley
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @TXDPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TXDPR edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TXDPR named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@izvestia named in 1 post, 28 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sputnikint named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Russian Diplomat 🅉 @R_Diplomat · 19,764 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance @NewResistance · 28,816 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Multipolar Market @multipolarmarket · 26,814 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺 @RussianBaZa · 20,598 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng @ukr_leaks_eng · 74,944 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Patrick Lancaster News Today @patricklancasternewstoday · 39,596 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 22,862 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 26,025 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,608 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
AntiFakeNews @yourantifakenews · 19,203 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
Foreign Agent Intel @ForeignAgentIntel · 30,898 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 69,155 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett @EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,454 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel @brianlovethailand · 40,678 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
🔰 Militär-News @militaernews · 64,775 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 69,221 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,396 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Russell TEXAS Bentley” (@TXDPR), 15,974 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TXDPR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.