Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Multipolar Market

@multipolarmarket

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,045subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001434456306
TypeChannel
Username@multipolarmarket
DescriptionCrypto, trade & finance news with a grain of humor
Created28 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/multipolarmarket

Growth

28,04528,13528,0906 August 2026 — 28,135 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,119 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,095 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,080 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,045 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,032–28,149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:1528,045-14
11 Aug 2026, 12:4228,059-21
10 Aug 2026, 10:3228,080-15
9 Aug 2026, 12:0128,095-10
8 Aug 2026, 15:1328,105-14
7 Aug 2026, 18:4528,119-16
6 Aug 2026, 21:1528,135no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:0528,135first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,660
Videos
372
Links
7,660

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,649 reactions across 20 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍72627.4%
🤡48518.3%
🤣28310.7%
2519.48%
😁1766.64%
👏1304.91%
🤪863.25%
🤔712.68%
🔥652.45%
🖕532.00%
🙏431.62%
💩331.25%
🥰311.17%
💯260.982%
😱230.868%
🤬200.755%
🏆190.717%
🥱190.717%
🌭150.566%
🤮140.529%
15 further kinds803.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @multipolarmarket. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 October 2025 to 8 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Dec 2025, 13:06 UTC≈16,000 views457 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Not dead. Yet. Was busy with the real life business, health and my child. Posting will be resumed soon.

👍27082🙏43👏38🤡9👌4🔥4🤷‍♂3

14 Oct 2025, 18:36 UTC≈27,400 views588 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Trump: “Everyone Is Dropping Out of BRICS. They Don’t Even Talk About BRICS Anymore.” Anyone actually left BRICS?

🤡395😁74🤪4120🥱18🤮11🙈9💊7

11 Oct 2025, 21:00 UTC≈28,100 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026

China Imposes Export Controls on Products Containing Rare Earths Starting December 1, China’s Ministry of Commerce will enforce export controls on any product containing more than 0.1% of Chinese rare earth elements. Regardless of the shipment’s origin, Beijing now reserves the right to block sales. For three years, the U.S. imposed tariffs on China and restricted chip exports. In response, China accelerated its d

👍116👏3618🏆15🤔1😁1

11 Oct 2025, 20:02 UTC≈16,000 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Andrei Babiš, Winner of Czech Elections: Not a Single Crown for Ukraine’s Weapons Andrei Babiš, whose party won the recent Czech parliamentary elections, declared that Prague will not allocate a single crown from the state budget to military aid for Ukraine. “There is no money for Ukraine,” Babiš stated, emphasizing that no funds from the Czech state budget will be sent to Kyiv. He also reiterated his promise to h

👍76👏3510🏆4🥰2🤮1

11 Oct 2025, 19:04 UTC≈11,900 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Star_Union_NewsPhoto

"They're doing this kind of nonsense." 🙄 The European Parliament has decided to rename vegan burgers and schnitzels 🍔🥬. Parliamentarians in Strasbourg 🇪🇺 have decided that, in order to avoid confusion, vegan burgers can no longer be called that. Now they will be called, for example, "soy patties" 🌱. Meat substitutes will also lose their right to the title of "schnitzels" and "sausages" 🌭🍽. Manufacturers and sellers

👍40🤡34🌭108🥰3💩2😁2🐳1

11 Oct 2025, 18:03 UTC≈11,700 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Soaring Gold Prices Boost Turkish Household Wealth by Over $100 Billion, Complicating Inflation Fight Record-high gold prices have increased Turkish household wealth by more than $100 billion, making it harder for the Central Bank to rein in inflation. According to the bank’s estimates, Turks hold roughly $500 billion worth of physical gold — often referred to as “mattress gold” — outside the formal financial system

🔥34🤣269🤯2🐳1

11 Oct 2025, 17:03 UTC≈6,050 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

What If Trump’s Reaction Isn’t Baseless? What If China Struck First? Not a trade war — but the next escalation of one. Starting September 2025, Chinese retail investors faced a sudden, coordinated wall blocking access to U.S. equity markets: Futu Securities and Tiger Brokers tightened account opening rules for mainland Chinese residents, now requiring proof of overseas permanent residency. Temporary work or study

36🤔26👏13🖕4👀2👍2🤮2

10 Oct 2025, 21:11 UTC≈8,770 views172 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Tariffs on China: 100% When you are too pissed about not getting a Nobel peace prize.

🤣134😁17💩94🙉3👏21🤯1

10 Oct 2025, 18:59 UTC≈16,900 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Many in the U.S. Nostalgically Long for the “Golden Age” of the 1950s–60s Yet the data tells a different story. In 1967, only 5% of American households earned more than $150,000 annually (adjusted for inflation to today’s dollars). Today, nearly 34% of U.S. households are in that income bracket. At the same time, the share of the poorest households—those earning less than $50,000 per year—has dropped significantly:

🤪44💩18🤔128👍4👎4😁2

10 Oct 2025, 17:59 UTC≈9,710 views117 reactionsread 12 August 2026

China Imposes Special Port Fee on U.S.-Flagged Vessels Chinese authorities have introduced a special port fee on ships flying the U.S. flag, the Ministry of Transport of China announced. According to the statement, this measure is a direct response to similar actions taken by Washington against vessels owned, manufactured, operated by Chinese companies, or sailing under the Chinese flag. Follow MM on Telegram

👍83💯12🥰86👀4👏2🖕1🤬1

10 Oct 2025, 16:59 UTC≈4,880 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026

EU Intensifies Pressure on Belgium to Seize Frozen Russian Assets – FT European Union member states are ramping up pressure on Belgium to unlock the roughly €190 billion in frozen Russian assets held in the Euroclear system, aiming to use them for a “reparations-backed loan” to Ukraine. The EU has criticized the Belgian government for refusing to shoulder the legal and financial risks alone. Specifically, EU offici

🤡47🤬11🤯98👀2🤪1🥰1

10 Oct 2025, 16:29 UTC≈4,080 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Readers, a personal recommendation: @geopolitics_prime – a channel that could be a real discovery for you. They not only cover the news from a non-mainstream angle but also consistently provide crucial background and explain the root causes. This is incredibly effective for reaching skeptics and those who still wear rose-colored glasses. It's definitely worth keeping in your subscriptions: https://t.me/+3VcDL5cSsqg5

👍4💩41

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @multipolarmarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 291,159 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bloomberg
@bloomberg · 166,870
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 295,285
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,851
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 328,133
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 191,636
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 395,638
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Multipolar Market” (@multipolarmarket), 28,045 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/multipolarmarket.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.