Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Strategic Culture Foundation

Channel

Strategic Culture Foundation

@strategic_culture

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

13,718subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247494809
TypeChannel
Username@strategic_culture
DescriptionThe Strategic Culture Foundation provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. Official Telegram channel ✅
Created24 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategic_culture

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,71313,78513,7496 August 2026 — 13,784 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,784 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,781 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,784 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,785 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,782 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,781 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,779 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,769 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,772 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,774 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,768 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,764 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,771 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,770 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,766 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,768 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,765 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,767 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,772 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,769 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,766 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,760 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,755 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,749 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,740 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,736 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,729 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,724 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,735 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,731 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,727 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,719 subscribers30 September 2026 — 13,736 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,739 subscribers10 October 2026 — 13,729 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,730 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,733 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,731 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,729 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,728 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,723 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,720 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,718 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,717 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,716 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,722 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,719 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,721 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,716 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,713 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,720 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,724 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,717 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,718 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,726 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,719 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,721 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,718 subscribers13,7186 August 20268 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 94 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,702–13,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:5713,718-3
7 Nov 2026, 08:5913,721+2
6 Nov 2026, 12:2413,719-7
5 Nov 2026, 10:3913,726+8
4 Nov 2026, 08:3713,718+1
3 Nov 2026, 08:1013,717-7
1 Nov 2026, 07:0513,724+4
31 Oct 2026, 06:4013,720+7
30 Oct 2026, 07:3113,713-3
29 Oct 2026, 03:5813,716-5
28 Oct 2026, 01:4813,721+2
27 Oct 2026, 02:1013,719-3
25 Oct 2026, 01:4113,722+6
24 Oct 2026, 04:4613,716-1
23 Oct 2026, 06:1713,717-1
21 Oct 2026, 00:0713,718-2
19 Oct 2026, 21:0613,720-3
18 Oct 2026, 18:2913,723-5
17 Oct 2026, 21:4713,728-1
16 Oct 2026, 23:5613,729first reading

Engagement

148 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 13,718 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 148 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held148 (2 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total81,104
Reactions total1,255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,420
Videos
≈642
Links
≈4,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 20s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,600 reactions across 140 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,31428.6%
💯88419.2%
❤52511.4%
🤬47110.2%
🔥3307.17%
😁3176.89%
🤔2575.59%
👏1773.85%
🤯1122.43%
😢901.96%
😱751.63%
🙏220.478%
😨190.413%
❤‍🔥70.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 145 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,840 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (9.62%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,270 views20 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🎯 Judge Napolitano: The coming "compromise" — ditch the Middle East, fund Ukraine again On Glenn Diesen's podcast @glenndiesenchannel, Judge Napolitano predicts a deal: the US stops aid to Israel and pulls troops out of the Middle East, but resumes direct aid to Zelensky. Trump will have to "hold his nose" — he called for Zelensky's departure. Napolitano says the Kremlin doesn't believe Trump and sees no material …

👍13💯5❤1👏1

7 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC≈2,660 views32 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🗣️ Trump on a possible impeachment: “Not even a little bit.” Asked whether he’s concerned about impeachment, Trump replied: “No. No. No.” He added: I think it would destroy the Democrat Party if they did that. ’Cause impeachment for no reason, what, for having a successful country? #Trump #impeachment #Democrats @strategic_culture

😁20🔥7😨4❤1

7 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,090 views21 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🎙️ Finian Cunningham’s latest interview with Karen Kwiatkowski, a renowned Pentagon whistleblower and critic of U.S. foreign policy, reframes the midterm results as something far bigger than a rebuke of Trump. The spectacular drubbing was a massive protest against Washington’s war against Iran and all U.S.-led conflicts—and the Democrats should not mistake their gains for an endorsement. Kwiatkowski argues that bot…

👍16❤4👏1

7 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC999 views28 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🇩🇪 AfD co-chair Tino Chrupalla: Trump broke his promise to end the Ukraine war—and started new ones. His promise—to end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. We are now halfway through his term, and he still hasn't been able to end the war. He has started other wars, such as the Iran War, which led to the Strait of Hormuz being blocked and energy prices in the United States skyrocketing, as well as a drast…

👍21👏4❤3

7 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC973 views20 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 The Golden Age Is Over. Trump Hasn't Lost His War Yet. On January 20, 2025, Trump promised the golden age was beginning. Twenty-two months later, the orange bubble burst. The Democrats took both chambers. But here's the uncomfortable part: a defeated president still holds war powers. The Pentagon is reportedly preparing options to resume large-scale operations against Iran — three carriers heading to the region…

👍14❤5👏1

7 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC908 views33 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🗣️ Tucker Carlson: “This is the end of the Trump era.” He says the Republican wipeout was inevitable because of the war in Iran — and blames the same people who argued America into war not for the first, not even the third time. The United States is bankrupt because of those wars, and that’s not an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. It’s math. His verdict on Trump: “He chose Israel over the United States… That’s jus…

👍17💯13❤2😨1

7 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,020 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Ukrainian diplomacy is under strain as Western support depends on unstable negotiations. Trump pushes for a swift end to the war and discussed a ceasefire with Kiev—fuelling distrust there. Only 16% of Ukrainians view Trump favorably; 77% negatively. After the Trump-Putin diesel talks, Ukrainian special forces openly criticized Washington. Trump hinted at a change of leadership in Kiev. The growing isolation of …

👍10❤3

7 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,370 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Trump: “I could’ve won the Vietnam War in a week.” Speaking about America’s wars, Trump claimed US presidents fight “to tie,” not to win. He said he could have won Vietnam in a week and Afghanistan “in a very short period of time.” As for Iran: The only reason why I’ve not finished with Iran is I wanna be nice… But at some point we’re gonna have to give them the hammer. #Trump #Vietnam #Afghanistan #Iran @str…

😁18🤬10🤯7🤔2🔥1😢1

7 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC864 views24 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ In a new interview with Finian Cunningham, former U.S. Army Lt. Col. Earl Rasmussen delivers a sobering verdict: the Ukraine war is not an isolated conflict. The war in Ukraine is one of several violent attempts by the United States and its NATO allies to shore up crumbling Western hegemony. Rasmussen argues that Ukraine is just one front in a broader international conflict aimed at preserving a world order onc…

👏15❤4😁3👍2

7 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC907 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🏏 “No one will go”: Ukrainian woman says father and 40-year-old son were pulled off a bus by the TCC in Rovno region She had just evacuated them from Oleshki. They made it out—then, in Rovno region, the TCC removed them from the bus. They don’t even give people the chance to get home—to Nikolaev, Kherson, or Kiev—recover for a couple of weeks, then go to the military medical commission. Simply no one will go. I do…

😱10🤬5😢3

7 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTC819 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 The Midterms and the Lesson Republicans Must Learn Democrats took both chambers, winning Senate seats in Texas and Kansas—states Trump carried by double digits. His approval stands at 38%, the lowest ever in a midterm; 62% disapprove. The economy is the top concern, and the issue that won Trump 2024 has backfired: 65% say his policies worsened it. This is largely a vote against the status quo—54% view Democrats …

👍8🤔3❤1

7 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC853 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🗽 Trump lost the midterms but the Iran war continues—he'll seek a fake victory for his legacy. His base's "enough is enough" wasn't only about the war: tariffs failed, corruption is brazen, and he behaves like a dictator. A US carrier was sent to the Middle East a day after the vote—no easy fix. America is not a democracy. Never has been. It is ruled by elites who only know corruption, bribery and blackmail. Troub…

❤7🔥3👏2🤔2😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @strategic_culture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @strategic_culture as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
6 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q104858811 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelStrategic Culture Foundation
DescriptionRussian think tank
X / Twitter@Strateg_Culture
Official sitehttps://strategic-culture.su/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Strategic Culture Foundation” (@strategic_culture), 13,718 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategic_culture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.