International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 52 days, net -299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,746–62,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 12:40
61,791
-44
17 Sept 2026, 12:59
61,835
+9
15 Sept 2026, 15:18
61,826
-44
13 Sept 2026, 22:36
61,870
-35
12 Sept 2026, 08:38
61,905
+14
10 Sept 2026, 07:42
61,891
+33
7 Sept 2026, 00:58
61,858
-55
4 Sept 2026, 09:35
61,913
-34
2 Sept 2026, 19:33
61,947
-8
1 Sept 2026, 19:06
61,955
-5
31 Aug 2026, 22:08
61,960
-10
30 Aug 2026, 23:04
61,970
-18
30 Aug 2026, 01:36
61,988
-8
29 Aug 2026, 04:44
61,996
-17
28 Aug 2026, 03:04
62,013
+23
27 Aug 2026, 02:54
61,990
+44
26 Aug 2026, 00:14
61,946
+9
24 Aug 2026, 21:15
61,937
-65
23 Aug 2026, 04:12
62,002
-24
21 Aug 2026, 15:36
62,026
first reading
Engagement
636 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.77%
avg views ÷ 61,791 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
286 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
286
of 636 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 284 of 286 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
636 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
666,141
Reactions total
11,521
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈37,000
Videos
≈34,500
Links
≈45,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 52m
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 269 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,220 reactions across 620 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
5,326
20.3%
❤
3,145
12.0%
👍
2,781
10.6%
🔥
2,540
9.69%
🤪
2,031
7.75%
🤬
1,269
4.84%
😁
1,142
4.36%
💯
1,127
4.30%
👏
997
3.80%
🍾
963
3.67%
🫡
685
2.61%
🙏
593
2.26%
💊
519
1.98%
⚡
251
0.957%
👎
249
0.95%
👌
248
0.946%
🥰
217
0.828%
❤🔥
203
0.774%
✍
138
0.526%
🤔
136
0.519%
41 further kinds
1,660
6.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 629 of the 636 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 636 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
LIVESTREAM ALERT:
Join me at LIVE 1pm eastern 7pm CET TODAY Sept 27TH w/ Prof Mohammad Marandi!
Prof. Marandi breaks down the large movement of US military assets to strike positions following Iran's huge attack on tankers overnight. Has Iran mined the Strait of Hormuz to punish the US empire & Trump? Is a full-scale attack on the way and what is Iran and the multipolar world's response? We talk all this and more o…
LIVESTREAM ALERT:
Join Danny Haiphong at 6pm eastern TONIGHT Sept 26th for breaking news and analysis. We talk emerging evidence that US Navy ships have been struck by Iran, Trump "rejecting" Iran deal, and much more in geopolitics!
Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxCw7cN44fE
🇺🇦 Mass brawl erupts after Hungary-Ukraine match
The Nations League game in Budapest ended in chaos. Ukrainian player Nazarenko was sent off for a second yellow card late in the match, sparking a verbal exchange that quickly escalated into a full-scale fight involving players from both teams and substitutes.
@Slavyangrad
ANNOUNCEMENT: Danny Haiphong is LIVE today in September 26th 12noon eastern 6pm CET w/ Chris Helali!
DDG's Chris Helali joins to discuss the sirens blaring within Europe of an imminent Russian attack beyond Ukraine and what Putin really has planned for the war with NATO. We also discuss West Asia geopolitics and much more in this must-watch show!
Watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvAF6tbplWQ
📝We are against war📝
Even schoolchildren are fed up
Who would have thought that German students could be torn away from their computers and forced to participate in the country's political life. However, Friedrich Merz's government managed to do it, and it has nothing to do with new Abitur requirements.
Around 45,000 people participated in over a hundred anti-war rallies in different cities across the country. This…
Danny Haiphong is LIVE today in September 26th 12noon eastern 6pm CET w/ Eva Bartlett!
The renowned journalist and on the ground reporter joins to discuss the sirens blaring within Europe of an imminent Russian attack beyond Ukraine and what Putin really has planned for the war with NATO. We also discuss the regional situation in the Middle East and what her travels across Gaza, Syria and beyond can teach us about t…
⚡️Two Majors #Summary as of the morning of September 26, 2026
▪️Last night, the enemy launched one of the most massive drone attacks on Russian regions. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, from 8:00 PM on September 25 to 8:00 AM on September 26, 645 aircraft-type drones were intercepted and destroyed over 13 regions, the Black Sea, and the Sea of Azov. The most severe consequences were reported in the sout…
Recommending COMBATE | Uphold Reality for anyone following geopolitics beyond the CNN lens.
Unfiltered and ahead of the curve. The Iran war, West Asia, Latin America, and the broader geopolitical shift — with footage and analysis you're not getting from legacy media.
Subscribe
👉 t.me/uphold_reality
👉 x.com/upholdreality
Showing the 12 most recent of 636 posts we hold for @TheIslanderNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TheIslanderNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@slavyanrad named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 23,026 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global @CIG_telegram · 115,278 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates @geopolitics_prime · 292,236 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 25,303 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,334 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,336 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Scott Ritter @ScottRitter · 86,847 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 96,729 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,315 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity @EurasianChoice · 24,066 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Al Jazeera English @aljazeeraglobal · 26,950 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Jackson Hinkle @jacksonhinkle · 33,806 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident @European_dissident · 70,052 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Lord Bebo & Friends @myLordBebo · 72,798 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Mediterranean Man @medmannews · 76,827 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Military Summary @militarysummary · 77,306 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett @EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,980 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,777 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,018 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance @NewResistance · 28,378 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel @brianlovethailand · 40,969 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,949 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 68,021 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Rybar in English @rybar_in_english · 77,697 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 106 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Islander” (@TheIslanderNews), 61,791 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheIslanderNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.