Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ElonMusk

Channel

ElonMusk

@elonmusk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,908subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327421720
TypeChannel
Username@elonmusk
Created27 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elonmusk

Growth

3,9083,9363,9225 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,931 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,936 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,929 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,935 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,908 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,904–3,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:513,908-27
12 Aug 2026, 06:383,935+6
9 Aug 2026, 14:123,929-7
6 Aug 2026, 23:163,936+5
6 Aug 2026, 04:213,931no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:303,931first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 November 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,132 reactions across 17 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,52937.0%
👍3307.99%
🤣2826.82%
🤨2796.75%
🖕2135.15%
😁1844.45%
🤮1694.09%
🤡1553.75%
🥰1453.51%
💩1232.98%
🔥1042.52%
🤬511.23%
👏461.11%
421.02%
👎380.92%
❤‍🔥370.895%
🐳350.847%
🎉330.799%
💊330.799%
🍌270.653%
27 further kinds2776.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2024 to 2 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 May 2026, 15:00 UTC≈135,000 views171 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

82🥰32👍15🔥11💯8😁7👏5🤮5

24 Mar 2026, 15:17 UTC≈38,000 views205 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

95🖕43😁27❤‍🔥10👏8🎉6🐳6🔥4

16 Mar 2026, 12:46 UTC≈38,100 views130 reactionsread 8 August 2026

60🤝14🤣11🍾10👏8💯8👍7🎉5

12 Feb 2026, 01:37 UTC≈40,700 views161 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

66🤣42🔥11🥰11🍌7🐳6👏5🎄4

14 Jan 2026, 00:49 UTC≈43,500 views209 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

75🖕45😁34🤣20❤‍🔥12🥰5💘4🤓4

29 Nov 2025, 00:27 UTC≈49,300 views256 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hi 🎁

🥰9562🤬29👌24🎄11😁107🏆6

5 Oct 2025, 15:56 UTC≈56,500 views215 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣9356😁1711🤬8❤‍🔥6🎄6🔥6

26 Jun 2025, 22:06 UTC≈69,800 views367 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Elon we want #unlimited_internet_in_egypt 😎

147😁61🤮37👍31🔥25🤡18🍓17🎉11

28 May 2025, 14:29 UTC≈75,400 views298 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A new marketplace of gifts from @Roxman has opened - @portals You can save a lot of money on 0% commission in the first 10 days. Account for sending gifts - @GiftsToPortals [Add to your contacts and change the name, so as not to run into fakes.] Have you started yet? Portals

122💩58👍39🤡33🤮9🦄9🎉7🔥7

27 May 2025, 12:52 UTC≈61,400 views239 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

130💩24🖕18🤬14👎13😁10💊8🍓7

13 May 2025, 15:20 UTC≈62,100 views215 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Here is Telegram Founder and CEO Pavel Durov rocking The #1 Plush Pepe, on his profile @monk Here you can see Durov’s commentary on them https://t.me/durov/390 Here is an article about the telegram gifts https://telegram.org/blog/collectible-gifts-and-more The Plush Pepe’s are created officially by Telegram. You will even see that Pavel Durov owns a bunch of them (@monk)! These are a highly sought after, scarce

110🔥25💩21👏12🐳10🤣9👍7🤮7

12 May 2025, 08:24 UTC≈45,800 views235 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hi people 🙂‍↕️

127👍34🐳13🤡13🗿12🍌76🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elonmusk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 567 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 294 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ElonMusk” (@elonmusk), 3,908 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elonmusk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.