Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Inessa S ️️

Channel

Inessa S ️️

@InessaFromYoutube

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,798subscribers

-458 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795183969
TypeChannel
Username@InessaFromYoutube
DescriptionSocial commentary you should care about - you live here! Political analyst, info war veteran. https://youtube.com/c/InessaS NO channel of 60+ million views there because the Digital Gestapo deleted it.
Created24 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/InessaFromYoutube

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,79814,25614,0276 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -458. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,729–14,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 15:3613,798-7
8 Nov 2026, 09:3413,805-5
7 Nov 2026, 00:3613,810-6
6 Nov 2026, 01:0713,816-8
5 Nov 2026, 03:3813,824-5
4 Nov 2026, 01:5713,829-3
3 Nov 2026, 05:1913,832-4
2 Nov 2026, 07:2413,836-2
1 Nov 2026, 06:4513,838-5
31 Oct 2026, 07:1813,843-14
30 Oct 2026, 06:5013,857-6
29 Oct 2026, 09:1713,863-3
27 Oct 2026, 09:5613,866-7
26 Oct 2026, 13:0413,873-4
25 Oct 2026, 12:1113,877-7
24 Oct 2026, 08:5413,884-6
23 Oct 2026, 11:5813,890-8
22 Oct 2026, 09:4513,898-8
21 Oct 2026, 02:3713,906-7
20 Oct 2026, 03:0013,913first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 13,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held60 (24 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total2,260
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,530
Videos
≈5,200
Links
≈2,860

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,327 reactions across 60 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡77014.5%
💯69813.1%
👍57010.7%
🤮4919.22%
❤4909.20%
🖕3516.59%
👏2394.49%
😁2314.34%
🤬2113.96%
🤣1953.66%
💩1603.00%
🔥1482.78%
🤔1312.46%
😢1242.33%
😈941.76%
🙏761.43%
🤪500.939%
🤯430.807%
🙈300.563%
🍌260.488%
32 further kinds1993.74%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

26 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,260 views85 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @ToiletSharesVideo

Bill Gates: on COVID “that one didn't work the way I expected...” On AI "Certainly in the cyber domain, you will see a lot of attacks"

😈37🖕29💩13🤡4🌚1🤔1

6 Oct 2026, 08:39 UTC≈4,620 views86 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Why are Mi6-derived smears so uncreative? Remember how they said Assange painted Embassy walls with poo? Who is so obsessed with shit over there?

😁59💩16👏5👍2🖕1🤩1🥱1😡1

6 Oct 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,440 views89 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @putingers_catPhoto

In this episode of "Pookraine of the brain," evil Pootin's sickret agents break into Finnish politicians' homes and take and leave massive dumps in order "to intimidate their targets." I shit you not. This is the news. Since "The Telegraph" that appears to have unleashed this shitshow is behind a paywall, I found another highly trustworthy source of this incredible news dump. 🤡💩🤡

💩38🤣25🤡11😁9👍2❤1👎1🤬1

4 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC≈4,410 views53 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

The nation must know its heroes by face

🤣36🤮10🖕6🌚1

4 Oct 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,960 views36 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Who controls self-exiled OLIGARCH Khodorkovsky, formerly the richest person in Russia? — by investigative journalist Sergey Sokolov Eerik-Niiles Kross — former secret services head of Estonia John Love — ex NATO General & rep in Moscow Khodorkovsky runs several 'pro-democracy' & anti-Russian movements abroad

🔥27😨6👍3

3 Oct 2026, 02:13 UTC≈3,090 views57 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

FIRST-EVER radio signal from a planet outside our solar system DETECTED 'The signal is evidence of a colossal magnetic field, not intelligent life' — CNN The planet is 63 LIGHT-YEARS away & the signal is 200 times stronger than Jupiter's — but scientists don't know WHY it's so powerful?

😁29👍11🤔4🦄4❤2🍌2🤡2😐2

30 Sept 2026, 09:47 UTC≈4,120 views45 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Q: What are people with LAPTOP jobs gonna do? Musk: The Age of ABUNDANCE is not about a Universal Basic Income, but a Universal HIGH Income. Is this the first time 'AI pioneers' publicly mention any kind of universal income? But basic laws of supply & demand leave many questions ...

🔥21🤔12😈6👎3👍2❤1

29 Sept 2026, 04:15 UTC≈3,280 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Russell Brand maintains a staunchly anti-establishment position, despite some politically motivated charges against him... But drawing on one's sense of faith or non-faith into a conversation that can be discussed with facts alone — probably quite polarizing? Why is he doing that..

👍25💯8🤔8❤4👎2🤡1

28 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,800 views63 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Superstar Dua Lipa dances with a glass on her head at cousin's BIG ALBANIAN WEDDING, in Kosovo And Kosovo is Serbia, 😎✌️

❤24🤡16💯12🔥5🌭3🤮2🤔1

28 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,610 views35 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Team, admitting new members into the chatroom has become impossible as you can see. Bots galore — Durov needs to sort it out.

😁21💯8🦄3❤2😢1

28 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC≈3,030 views138 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

‘I want to KILL YOU... I want to EXECUTE YOU’ — Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir THREATENS Palestinian prisoner Hassan Salameh... Salameh has been imprisoned since 1996 — that's 30 years of his life. There's something incredibly sadistic and not right with Ben-Gvir, surrounded by security while talking smack.

🤬85😈22🤮20💯5😱3❤1👍1🔥1

17 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈4,540 views172 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Life must be hard being this retarded? UK Tory Leader says Putin is coming for Britain. Yep - that little isle with 0 resources & an enormous amount of societal problems. But if you INVERSE what she's saying — it's NATO planning an attack on Russia by 2030...

🤣73🤡54💯19💩9🙈9👍3❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @InessaFromYoutube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@InessaFromYoutube edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
@NewResistance · 28,816
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Russian MFA 🇷🇺
@MFARussia · 54,672
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Scott Ritter
@ScottRitter · 85,712
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,454
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Pepe Escobar
@rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,007
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
@brianlovethailand · 40,678
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Eurasia & Multipolarity
@EurasianChoice · 23,582
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH
@infodefENGLAND · 50,396
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Node of Time EN
@node_of_time_en · 19,844
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 September 2026
Multipolar Market
@multipolarmarket · 26,814
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Fearless John - @European_dissident
@European_dissident · 69,221
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,892
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,367
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Vanessa Beeley
@VanessaBeeley · 21,721
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
UKR LEAKS_eng
@ukr_leaks_eng · 74,965
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
Patrick Lancaster News Today
@patricklancasternewstoday · 39,596
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Jackson Hinkle
@jacksonhinkle · 33,190
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
@AussieCossack · 70,529
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Russians With Attitude
@rwapodcast · 36,195
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Foreign Agent Intel
@ForeignAgentIntel · 30,898
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Dan Kovalik
@danielmkovalik · 39,188
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Victor vicktop55
@vicktop55 · 26,853
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
🇷🇺☦️ Russian БaZa ☦️🇷🇺
@RussianBaZa · 20,598
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Russian Diplomat 🅉
@R_Diplomat · 19,778
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Inessa S ️️” (@InessaFromYoutube), 13,798 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InessaFromYoutube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.