Bill Gates: on COVID “that one didn't work the way I expected...” On AI "Certainly in the cyber domain, you will see a lot of attacks"
😈37🖕29💩13🤡4🌚1🤔1

Channel
@InessaFromYoutube
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,798subscribers
-458 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001795183969 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @InessaFromYoutube |
| Description | Social commentary you should care about - you live here! Political analyst, info war veteran. https://youtube.com/c/InessaS NO channel of 60+ million views there because the Digital Gestapo deleted it. |
| Created | 24 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/InessaFromYoutube |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 15:36 | 13,798 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 13,805 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:36 | 13,810 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 13,816 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:38 | 13,824 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:57 | 13,829 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:19 | 13,832 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:24 | 13,836 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:45 | 13,838 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 13,843 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 13,857 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:17 | 13,863 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 13,866 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:04 | 13,873 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 13,877 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:54 | 13,884 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 13,890 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 13,898 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 13,906 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 13,913 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (24 July 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,260 |
| Reactions total | 85 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,327 reactions across 60 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 770 | 14.5% | |
| 💯 | 698 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 570 | 10.7% | |
| 🤮 | 491 | 9.22% | |
| ❤ | 490 | 9.20% | |
| 🖕 | 351 | 6.59% | |
| 👏 | 239 | 4.49% | |
| 😁 | 231 | 4.34% | |
| 🤬 | 211 | 3.96% | |
| 🤣 | 195 | 3.66% | |
| 💩 | 160 | 3.00% | |
| 🔥 | 148 | 2.78% | |
| 🤔 | 131 | 2.46% | |
| 😢 | 124 | 2.33% | |
| 😈 | 94 | 1.76% | |
| 🙏 | 76 | 1.43% | |
| 🤪 | 50 | 0.939% | |
| 🤯 | 43 | 0.807% | |
| 🙈 | 30 | 0.563% | |
| 🍌 | 26 | 0.488% | |
| 32 further kinds | 199 | 3.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Bill Gates: on COVID “that one didn't work the way I expected...” On AI "Certainly in the cyber domain, you will see a lot of attacks"
😈37🖕29💩13🤡4🌚1🤔1
Why are Mi6-derived smears so uncreative? Remember how they said Assange painted Embassy walls with poo? Who is so obsessed with shit over there?
😁59💩16👏5👍2🖕1🤩1🥱1😡1
In this episode of "Pookraine of the brain," evil Pootin's sickret agents break into Finnish politicians' homes and take and leave massive dumps in order "to intimidate their targets." I shit you not. This is the news. Since "The Telegraph" that appears to have unleashed this shitshow is behind a paywall, I found another highly trustworthy source of this incredible news dump. 🤡💩🤡
💩38🤣25🤡11😁9👍2❤1👎1🤬1
The nation must know its heroes by face
🤣36🤮10🖕6🌚1
Who controls self-exiled OLIGARCH Khodorkovsky, formerly the richest person in Russia? — by investigative journalist Sergey Sokolov Eerik-Niiles Kross — former secret services head of Estonia John Love — ex NATO General & rep in Moscow Khodorkovsky runs several 'pro-democracy' & anti-Russian movements abroad
🔥27😨6👍3
FIRST-EVER radio signal from a planet outside our solar system DETECTED 'The signal is evidence of a colossal magnetic field, not intelligent life' — CNN The planet is 63 LIGHT-YEARS away & the signal is 200 times stronger than Jupiter's — but scientists don't know WHY it's so powerful?
😁29👍11🤔4🦄4❤2🍌2🤡2😐2
Q: What are people with LAPTOP jobs gonna do? Musk: The Age of ABUNDANCE is not about a Universal Basic Income, but a Universal HIGH Income. Is this the first time 'AI pioneers' publicly mention any kind of universal income? But basic laws of supply & demand leave many questions ...
🔥21🤔12😈6👎3👍2❤1
Russell Brand maintains a staunchly anti-establishment position, despite some politically motivated charges against him... But drawing on one's sense of faith or non-faith into a conversation that can be discussed with facts alone — probably quite polarizing? Why is he doing that..
👍25💯8🤔8❤4👎2🤡1
Superstar Dua Lipa dances with a glass on her head at cousin's BIG ALBANIAN WEDDING, in Kosovo And Kosovo is Serbia, 😎✌️
❤24🤡16💯12🔥5🌭3🤮2🤔1
Team, admitting new members into the chatroom has become impossible as you can see. Bots galore — Durov needs to sort it out.
😁21💯8🦄3❤2😢1
‘I want to KILL YOU... I want to EXECUTE YOU’ — Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir THREATENS Palestinian prisoner Hassan Salameh... Salameh has been imprisoned since 1996 — that's 30 years of his life. There's something incredibly sadistic and not right with Ben-Gvir, surrounded by security while talking smack.
🤬85😈22🤮20💯5😱3❤1👍1🔥1
Life must be hard being this retarded? UK Tory Leader says Putin is coming for Britain. Yep - that little isle with 0 resources & an enormous amount of societal problems. But if you INVERSE what she's saying — it's NATO planning an attack on Russia by 2030...
🤣73🤡54💯19💩9🙈9👍3❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @InessaFromYoutube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@InessaFromYoutube edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inessa S ️️” (@InessaFromYoutube), 13,798 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InessaFromYoutube.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.