Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Two Majors - English Channel

@two_majors

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,889subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001861575578
TypeChannel
Username@two_majors
DescriptionIt will be interesting. We are here thinking. ATTENTION: We never DM people, that's a scam if someone writes you in our name!
Created10 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/two_majors

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

46,83346,88946,8615 August 2026 — 46,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,863 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,848 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,837 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,835 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,875 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,889 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,825–46,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:5546,889+14
11 Aug 2026, 17:2346,875+40
10 Aug 2026, 20:3846,835-2
9 Aug 2026, 22:3146,837-11
8 Aug 2026, 23:0346,848-15
7 Aug 2026, 20:5446,863+23
6 Aug 2026, 22:5146,840+7
6 Aug 2026, 01:4746,833no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0246,833first reading

Engagement

195 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.66%
avg views ÷ 46,889 subscribers
Avg views / post
780
195 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
195
of 195 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 191 of 195 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held195 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total152,071
Reactions total3,645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
41,400
Videos
21,900
Links
49,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 31m
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,356 reactions across 173 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣52615.7%
49314.7%
👍48414.4%
😁37111.1%
💯2557.60%
🤬2286.79%
👏1153.43%
🔥942.80%
😢862.56%
custom 5398017006165305287722.15%
🙏712.12%
👎531.58%
🫡511.52%
🤪491.46%
❤‍🔥441.31%
🤯431.28%
🎉361.07%
320.954%
😱300.894%
🤔270.805%
21 further kinds1965.84%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 191 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rybar_in_englishPhoto

• 📝Boiler warm-up📝 Subdivisions of the Russian "North" troop grouping continue their offensive in the Burluk direction. New successes have been recorded on the eastern flank, where the settlement of Vodyane came under control of the Russian Armed Forces. The village is located between the recently freed Anishchino and the larger Olkhovatka, where firefights have already begun, with the enemy attempting to hold back

🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC257 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Kramatorsk Direction Soldiers from the UAV platoon of the 255th Motor Rifle Regiment are sharing footage from their frontline life. Between combat missions, the operators continue to train right in the dugout. Using specialized computer simulators, they practice controlling FPV drones, performing complex maneuvers, and operating in various conditions. ✨ Behind the controls is one of the most experienced and effect

❤‍🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC378 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Statement from the Russian Ministry of Defense: Russian military forces continue to strike at port infrastructure and naval vessels operating in the interests of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Over the past 24 hours, the following targets were hit: - In the port of Chornomorsk: fuel and lubricant storage tanks and port infrastructure facilities used for unloading and storing military cargo. - In the port of Odessa: a

👍7❤‍🔥1🌚1🫡1

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC461 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦 Ukrainians reveal the name of their "Shahed-like" drone. The drone, previously identified as Batyar-S, is named MICH 2000 and was created based on the Chinese ZTK-150 drone. This information comes from a Ukrainian publication, whose journalist visited the manufacturer's factory. It is reported that at the end of 2023, Ukrainians traveled to China to purchase long-range drones. At that time, China had already off

🤬7🤔2

12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC450 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Slavyansk Direction Drone operators from the Southern Military District are sharing footage of combat operations in the suburbs of Slavyansk. ✨ The footage shows our FPV drone, equipped with fiber optics, pursuing an all-terrain vehicle carrying three enemy soldiers. Despite their speed and attempts to evade, they were unable to escape: the operator caught up with the target and inflicted fire damage. ⚡️Two Majors

👍8

12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC783 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Footage has emerged of the fire at the logistics complex in Brovary, which was struck by "Geran" kamikaze drones today. ⚡️Two Majors

👍133

12 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC597 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

The people of Ukraine love their defenders. Nikolaev ⚡️Two Majors

👍15😁1

12 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC656 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Even on his home turf at Fox News, Trump is already being heavily criticized: "Mr. Trump, you are the only U.S. president who started a war on his own and lost. You made America weak and disrespected." ⚡️Two Majors

😁182👌2

12 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC703 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Warehouses are on fire in the Kyiv region – visible even from space. Thermal anomalies have appeared on NASA's FIRMS maps. Reports indicate that a warehouse belonging to a logistics company, which handled transportation for major retail chains such as "ATB," "METRO," "Novus," "Auchan," and "Silpo," has been damaged in Brovary. The name of the company has not been specified, but it is reported that it operated thro

👍161👏1

12 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC106 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Propaganda works very well in England. They hate Russians, even though England does not border Russia, and for decades, the English have lived comfortably thanks to the taxes paid by wealthy Russian emigrants. ⚡️Two Majors

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC264 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The rerouting of flights from Russia has resulted in Istanbul Airport surpassing London Heathrow and becoming the busiest airport in Europe. In July, Istanbul handled 8.15 million passengers, compared to 7.86 million at Heathrow. The sanctions have benefited Turkey. Istanbul, more than other major hubs, has benefited from the closure of Russian airspace, as passengers and airlines have sought alternative routes to A

👍7

12 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC284 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rybar_in_english

📝A second front against grain📝 Water levels in the Danube have dropped Bloomberg describes a rare combination of factors hitting the Black Sea grain corridor from two sides at once: record-low water levels in the Danube have sharply limited the capacity of the Romanian section of the river, while intensified Russian strikes force Ukraine to increasingly redirect its grain around Odesa. The port of Constanța, which

👌5

Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @two_majors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,157 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Intel Slava
@intelslava · 395,638
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
DD Geopolitics
@DDGeopolitics · 191,636
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates
@geopolitics_prime · 295,285
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 178,397
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 385,979
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Global News Monitor
@warmonitors · 155,545
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Two Majors - English Channel” (@two_majors), 46,889 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/two_majors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.