Yes. Don't care.
🤣23😁2🤡1

Channel
@americanmajority
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,059subscribers
+613 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001539341585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @americanmajority |
| Description | Rainbet.com #1 non-kyc crypto casino & sportsbook @rainbetcom Esoteric America. Geopolitics, philosophy. Contact me @peytontheam |
| Created | 14 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/americanmajority |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @thecradlemedia/6630917 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC | @americanmajority/8886 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC | 0.99 | 7.9 hours |
| @thecradlemedia/6631717 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC | @americanmajority/8882 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC | 0.99 | 3.5 hours |
| @thecradlemedia/6687227 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC | @americanmajority/9027 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC | 0.99 | 9.3 hours |
| @thecradlemedia/6658321 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC | @americanmajority/8936 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC | 0.99 | 5.5 hours |
| @thecradlemedia/6643719 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC | @americanmajority/8909 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC | 0.99 | 5.3 hours |
| @thecradlemedia/6672524 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC | @americanmajority/8972 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | 0.97 | 52 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @thecradlemedia | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 5.4 hours | @thecradlemedia (6–0) |
| @intelslava | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 53 minutes | this entry (4–1) |
| @middle_east_spectator | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 6.1 hours | @middle_east_spectator (11–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 546 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:59 | 26,059 | -18 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 26,077 | -26 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:54 | 26,103 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:18 | 26,110 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 26,119 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:08 | 26,133 | +3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 26,130 | +63 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:06 | 26,067 | +47 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 26,020 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 26,023 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 26,025 | +30 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:02 | 25,995 | +43 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 25,952 | +55 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 25,897 | +25 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 25,872 | +23 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 25,849 | +148 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 25,701 | +203 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:05 | 25,498 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 25,497 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:45 | 25,510 | first reading |
632 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 183 of 184 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 632 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 307,341 |
| Reactions total | 5,754 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16,570 reactions across 626 posts, in 64 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 2,982 | 18.0% | |
| 💯 | 2,701 | 16.3% | |
| 🤡 | 1,912 | 11.5% | |
| 😁 | 1,605 | 9.69% | |
| ❤ | 1,057 | 6.38% | |
| 👍 | 994 | 6.00% | |
| 🤬 | 949 | 5.73% | |
| 👏 | 851 | 5.14% | |
| 🤮 | 762 | 4.60% | |
| 🖕 | 486 | 2.93% | |
| 🔥 | 423 | 2.55% | |
| 💩 | 416 | 2.51% | |
| 🤔 | 198 | 1.19% | |
| 👎 | 119 | 0.718% | |
| 🤪 | 118 | 0.712% | |
| 🥱 | 104 | 0.628% | |
| 😈 | 88 | 0.531% | |
| 😡 | 64 | 0.386% | |
| 🥴 | 59 | 0.356% | |
| 🤯 | 57 | 0.344% | |
| 44 further kinds | 625 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 630 of the 632 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,712 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 632 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 184 posts held from the last 30 days (4.89%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Yes. Don't care.
🤣23😁2🤡1
Spain eyes TikTok shutdown over 20,000 suspected pedophile profiles The Spanish Ministry of Youth and Children has asked prosecutors to investigate the TikTok social media platform after thousands of videos allegedly depicting child sexual abuse and interactions involving suspected pedophiles were uncovered on the platform, El Pais reported on Monday. I personally don't care about actual motivations at all. If soci…
💯25👍3👎2
Is Massie real opposition?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Massie files 8 articles of impeachment against Hegseth The 34 page impeachment resolution maintained that Hegseth "directed and caused" US armed forces "to be introduced into hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran" without congressional authorization, a declaration of war, or a qualifying national emergency. "Secretary Hegseth knowingly executed and implemented unlawful orders to initiate war against a fo…
👏13❤3🫡2
✍️ If you are a white person and consider yourself a Christian worthy of that name, then you have no right to be afraid to think and say what you think, even against the authority that persecutes people like us. If you are afraid to pay a fine or even go to prison for a while for your views/values/religion, then you are not worthy of them. Remember that even if they convict you, you are not a criminal. You are a sym…
❤20🔥5🤮2🥰2😁1
"This is sabotage": Hegseth address impeachment efforts in first press conference in over 180 days Speaking to reporters on Tuesday at the Pentagon, Hegseth condemned the efforts led by outgoing Thomas Massie, stating they marked the first time a secretary of war or defense was punished for winning military conflicts. "In the 250 years of our American republic, no secretary of war or secretary of defense has ever b…
💩19🤡10💯2😁2❤1
Mali: Another front in the West's campaign against Russia in Africa Mali's President Assimi Goïta has awarded Russian General Andrey Averyanov the title of Commander of the National Order of Mali, recognising Russia's contribution to security and defence cooperation. The award comes amid an escalating insurgency, with jihadist militants threatening key cities and the Malian army struggling to contain the offensive.…
💯13👍3💩3👏2🫡1
Videos 1 and 2: Iranian strikes on 3 tankers in the straight of Hormuz. The folliwing image is of an Iranian strike on gas fields in Iraqi Kurdistan. The final 2 images are from US attacks on Qeshm, where it is believed air defense assets are being targeted to prepare for a renewed attack. Marco Rubio has recently commented on negotiations saying that they aren't going anywhere. It appears that Trump's priority r…
👎23🔥10😱1
And you thought it couldn't get any gayer...
🤮45😁14🤣10💩5🥰2❤1👍1
And no, these memes aren't "online right's closing campaign arguments." What a retarded way of presenting it. But what else can you possibly expect from that kike Shapiro and his goons. What it is, is a capitulation. It's a rejection of the system by the people who were most betrayed by it. The first time and the very young voters have realized none of this works for them and never will. While this is all very posi…
💯32👍3
"You were meant to destroy the right wing extremists, not join them!" The jew media's ceaseless attempts to portray anything that's even remotely good not only for whites but also for everyone else who is starting to get it as some weird and exotic right wing extremism are pathetic. They are pathetic because it's all running out of time. The only people still buying this shit are retarded "muh democracy" boomers and…
💯23❤2👏2😱1
"We will hold them responsible..." It's really funny to see all the shitlibs celebrating the midterm results and saying shit like "omg we will prosecute the criminals in the administration." Or "the people responsible for the war with Iran will be held accountable." And when I say it's funny I mean it's sad. The genocide in Gaza started under Biden, not Trump. Trump continued the agenda, just like "Democrats" will …
💯68🔥5👍4😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 632 posts we hold for @americanmajority. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @americanmajority as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is Massie real opposition?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Where is Kash Patel?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 632 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The American Majority” (@americanmajority), 26,059 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/americanmajority.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.