Channel
@americanmajority
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,303subscribers
-143 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001539341585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @americanmajority |
| Description | Esoteric America. Geopolitics, philosophy. Contact me @peytontheam |
| Created | 14 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/americanmajority |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 25,303 | -23 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 25,326 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 25,340 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 25,356 | +20 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 25,336 | -30 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 25,366 | +16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 25,350 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 25,342 | +54 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 25,288 | +96 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 25,192 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 25,203 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 25,222 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 25,216 | +17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 25,199 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 25,189 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 25,203 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 25,226 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 25,240 | -27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 25,267 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 25,265 | first reading |
334 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 334 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 51,125 |
| Reactions total | 1,381 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,412 reactions across 329 posts, in 57 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 1,531 | 18.2% | |
| 🤣 | 1,367 | 16.3% | |
| 🤡 | 934 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 851 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 633 | 7.52% | |
| ❤ | 549 | 6.53% | |
| 🤬 | 543 | 6.46% | |
| 👏 | 471 | 5.60% | |
| 🤮 | 273 | 3.25% | |
| 🖕 | 230 | 2.73% | |
| 🔥 | 208 | 2.47% | |
| 💩 | 182 | 2.16% | |
| 🥱 | 90 | 1.07% | |
| 🤪 | 68 | 0.808% | |
| 🤔 | 61 | 0.725% | |
| 😈 | 53 | 0.63% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 0.547% | |
| 😭 | 31 | 0.369% | |
| 😎 | 25 | 0.297% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 0.285% | |
| 37 further kinds | 242 | 2.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 333 of the 334 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,554 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 334 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How Shin Bet Uses Human Intelligence Shin Bet’s work in the occupied Palestinian territories relies heavily on human intelligence. The agency is responsible for what Israel defines as counterterrorism intelligence in the West Bank and Gaza. It works with Aman to assess Palestinian organizations, political developments and the possible consequences of Israeli policies. But intelligence gathering does not rely solel…
🙏1
Shin Bet and the Machinery of Occupation Shin Bet is Israel’s designated internal security service. It gathers intelligence, conducts interrogations, pursues counterespionage cases and monitors people who fall outside the conventional military chain of command. Its mandate includes preventing attacks originating in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, countering foreign intelligence activity inside Isra…
🤝1
The Intelligence Failure Before October 7 Israel’s technological intelligence capabilities did not prevent the failure that preceded Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. The article notes that Unit 8200 had gathered indications that Hamas was preparing for an operation, but those indications failed to overturn the assumptions held by political and military leaders. A previous decision had also left the unit without an operati…
🤝1
The Mossad Myth Took a Hit in Dubai Mossad’s reputation for conducting operations abroad while leaving little evidence behind suffered a major setback in January 2010. That month, Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was assassinated in Dubai. The killing itself succeeded, but Dubai’s extensive surveillance network exposed significant details about the suspected operation. Investigators identified members of the sus…
🤡4
Mossad’s Role Goes Far Beyond Espionage Mossad is Israel’s primary foreign intelligence service, responsible for intelligence collection and covert activity outside territories under direct Israeli control. Its responsibilities can include recruiting sources, gathering information, infiltrating organizations and disrupting operations directed against Israel or Israeli interests. The article notes that Mossad’s spe…
🤮2🎉1
Three Agencies, Three Different Missions By the early 1950s, Israel’s intelligence system had settled around three principal services: Mossad, Shin Bet and Aman. Aman became the military intelligence arm. Its job was to collect information for the Israeli military, produce national-level assessments and analyze the capabilities and intentions of foreign militaries and armed organizations. Shin Bet, also known as S…
❤2🎉1👍1💯1
Video, posted without a caption
🤣9💯2
Israel’s Intelligence System Was Built Through Rivalry Israel’s intelligence establishment did not begin as the unified system it later became. In the early years of the state, different political and military figures competed for control over the emerging intelligence services. Under Israel’s first prime minister, David Ben Gurion, authority was divided between the prime minister’s office, the foreign minister, th…
💯2👍1🤝1
Trump has rejected a seven-day ceasefire with Iran, as he intends to resume hostilities against it after the midterm elections in November. This was reported by The Wall Street Journal, citing sources. According to the publication, the US President received a proposal from representatives of Tehran for mutual de-escalation, in exchange for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. "The Tehran proposal involved unblocki…
🤡14🎉1
You can (not) escape Modern society continually breaks us of our ability to resist its designs on us. At the end of the day, we all depend on the rest of society to get what we want, and in return it asks of us what it can get from us. Our existence within society is a continuous negotiation. What am I on about, exactly? Lately, I've been thinking about how people have continually desired to withdraw from society i…
👍16❤5👏2🔥1🤝1
Iran has threatened to shut down air traffic across the entire Middle East in response to U.S. sanctions. @americanmajority
👏29😁5👍1💩1🤝1
What We Still Don’t Know About the Nord Stream Sabotage Four years after the Nord Stream explosions, the investigation has produced a growing body of evidence — but important questions remain unresolved. Germany has charged Serhii Kuznietsov and alleges that a Ukrainian team used the Andromeda to transport divers and explosives to the pipeline sites. Investigators found traces of RDX and HMX aboard the yacht, and a…
🤡9🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 334 posts we hold for @americanmajority. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The American Majority” (@americanmajority), 25,303 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/americanmajority.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.