The Iranians tried to kill me, so they transported me in a food delivery van — Trump 😂🤡
😁18🤣11👻3❤1
Signed victor

Channel
@vicktop55
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,902subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001762841137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vicktop55 |
| Description | News and comments from Viktor contact me @vicktop555 |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vicktop55 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 26,902 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 26,908 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 26,920 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 26,914 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 26,916 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:50 | 26,912 | +21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 26,891 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 26,892 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 26,892 | first reading |
126 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 118 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 126 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 98,730 |
| Reactions total | 3,592 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,592 reactions across 118 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,255 | 34.9% | |
| 💯 | 470 | 13.1% | |
| ❤ | 352 | 9.80% | |
| 👏 | 313 | 8.71% | |
| 🤬 | 232 | 6.46% | |
| 🤡 | 168 | 4.68% | |
| 😁 | 146 | 4.06% | |
| 🔥 | 120 | 3.34% | |
| 🤣 | 90 | 2.51% | |
| 🙏 | 47 | 1.31% | |
| 💊 | 42 | 1.17% | |
| 🤔 | 36 | 1.00% | |
| 🫡 | 34 | 0.947% | |
| 😡 | 31 | 0.863% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 0.835% | |
| 🍌 | 25 | 0.696% | |
| 🥴 | 25 | 0.696% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 0.612% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 0.585% | |
| 🍾 | 21 | 0.585% | |
| 23 further kinds | 112 | 3.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Iranians tried to kill me, so they transported me in a food delivery van — Trump 😂🤡
😁18🤣11👻3❤1
Signed victor
"The Europeans have come up with the idea of seizing our ships. This is nothing less than piracy and robbery. If this is implemented in practice, we will respond in kind. Anywhere," Vladimir Putin said. The West is deeply mistaken in thinking that Russia will tolerate its piracy and robbery, Vladimir Dzhabarov told RT. The first deputy chairman of the Federation Council committee noted that Western countries aren't…
👏20❤6💯3🍌1🤡1🤣1
Signed victor
"We are not threatening Japan; we have no claims against it. On the contrary, Japan has territorial claims against our country," Vladimir Putin said on Tokyo's decision to classify Russia as the "source of the main threats."
👍14🍌1
Signed victor
Medvedev on the SMO ending on Russia's terms: "With the termination or suspension of the SMO, which will naturally happen sooner or later, and naturally on our terms, the ideological confrontation will in no way end, because all these problems—they're not the only ones with them, we have them too. Look at how many idiots have been brought to light during this very difficult period. Idiots, well, young ones, so to s…
👍14
Signed victor
Last night, the Russian Armed Forces struck a fuel and lubricants base in the port of Odessa, which supplied fuel to Ukrainian Armed Forces units, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported.
👍21👏9🫡3❤2
Signed victor
"Iran is strengthening the influence of hard-liners in decision-making bodies, particularly in the security and defense spheres. This suggests that Tehran is preparing for the possibility of further escalation and confrontation, rather than quick concessions." NBC reported this in response to a number of new appointments in the IRGC.
👏26😁2🙏2🫡1
Signed victor
If Iran "does anything," it will be destroyed, Donald Trump declared. So, did Trump defeat Iran or not? He's declared victory so many times, and now he's going to war again?
🤣26🤡17💊4🍌1👻1
Signed victor
Russian Ministry of Defense: Over the past night, air defense alert forces intercepted and destroyed 502 Ukrainian fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) over the Belgorod, Bryansk, Kaluga, Kursk, Lipetsk, and Oryol regions, Krasnodar Krai, the Republic of Crimea, and the Black Sea.
👍17🙏4🫡3
Signed victor
Vladimir Putin arrived in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk to participate in the final stage of the Pacific Fleet exercises.
❤14👍5🫡2👏1
Signed victor
Novorossiysk Mayor Kravchenko: Novorossiysk endured a horrific night, repelling a brutal attack by the Ukrainian fascist scum. Tragically, a child was killed. This is a most irreparable loss. Several hundred Ukrainian Armed Forces drones were repelled as a result of the massive enemy attack. Civilian infrastructure was damaged: four businesses and 21 residential buildings, including apartment buildings. Most of the…
🤬19😡1😨1🙏1
Signed victor
Metinvest plants in Zaporozhzhia were attacked overnight. Blast furnaces were destroyed and cannot be repaired. The only option is to rebuild them from scratch. Zaporozhstal is a large, full-cycle steel mill. The plant produced cast iron, steel, and flat products from various steel grades, including for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
👍14👏5🫡2
Signed victor
This night, the targets of the “Geran”‑type UAV strikes and the “Iskander” OTRK missile systems were located in the vicinity of Kiev, in Dnepropetrovsk and the region, in Sumy, Odessa, in the Poltava and Chernigov regions, as well as in Zaporozhzhia and Kherson, which are under the control of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
👍12🫡2👏1🔥1
Signed victor
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @vicktop55. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 235,325 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Victor vicktop55” (@vicktop55), 26,902 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vicktop55.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.