International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 295,123–295,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 18:07
295,148
-137
12 Aug 2026, 17:37
295,285
-30
11 Aug 2026, 18:12
295,315
+37
10 Aug 2026, 17:23
295,278
+4
9 Aug 2026, 19:51
295,274
+31
8 Aug 2026, 23:11
295,243
+48
8 Aug 2026, 01:17
295,195
+27
7 Aug 2026, 01:25
295,168
-58
6 Aug 2026, 03:40
295,226
-3
6 Aug 2026, 01:46
295,229
first reading
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.74%
avg views ÷ 295,148 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 154 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
154 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
1,700,620
Reactions total
32,601
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,600
Videos
≈12,000
Links
≈15,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 26s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31,334 reactions across 144 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
6,287
20.1%
❤
6,204
19.8%
💩
4,996
15.9%
👏
2,745
8.76%
😁
2,653
8.47%
👍
2,417
7.71%
💯
1,919
6.12%
🔥
1,878
5.99%
🤔
511
1.63%
🥴
486
1.55%
👎
381
1.22%
🫡
316
1.01%
👌
205
0.654%
✍
158
0.504%
😢
131
0.418%
🙏
47
0.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,601reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 154 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @geopolitics_prime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 154 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸💣🇮🇷 US strikes leave Iranian coast as toxic dead zone
Strikes on Iranian refineries have resulted in a major pollution crisis for Qeshm Island and surrounding areas, creating a potential environmental catastrophe that could last for decades, Iranian officials warn.
The pollution has affected approximately 32,000 square meters of coastline and 90,000 square meters of marine waters in Hormozgan province alone. Iran…
🇮🇱 Did Israel play the “Iran threat” card AGAIN to push Trump toward war?
The secret operation to spirit President Donald Trump out of Turkey last month undercover was based on Israeli intelligence that US officials themselves viewed as "low confidence," according to the Wall St. Journal.
🔴 The information, which suggested Iran might assassinate Trump using a shoulder-launched missile, prompted the Secret Service …
🇮🇱🇵🇸 How Israel’s ‘security’ decree is blueprint for Palestinian displacement in plain sight
In the occupied West Bank, a new military decree is exposing the grim reality of Israel's strategy in the region. The Israeli Defense Force (IDF) declared the Christian-majority village of Taybeh a "closed military zone" under the official pretext of stopping escalating settler attacks.
The reality on the ground tells a ver…
🇺🇸🇮🇷 US struggles to maintain Iran blockade amid fleet exhaustion
The US is preparing to replace the USS Abraham Lincoln with the USS George Washington after sailors onboard faced widespread problems with morale, safety, and basic living conditions, the WSJ reports.
US War Secretary Pete Hegseth previously stated that the Pentagon has all the resources needed to maintain the blockade of Iran, while US officials rep…
🚨🇮🇷Another MQ-9 meets Iran’s air defenses over Hormozgan
Iran says a new IRGC air defense system, operating within the country’s integrated air defense network, intercepted and destroyed an MQ-9 drone over Hormozgan province.
👍 Boost us | Chat | @geopolitics_prime
🇷🇺 ⛴ How Russia’s gut-punching strikes bleed Ukraine’s naval assets & choke NATO supply lines
From the Black Sea to the Danube waterway, Russia’s forces have ramped-up hammering attacks on Ukraine’s naval assets, port infrastructure and logistics chains.
Precision strikes with long-range Geran-series seeker drones, Lancet loitering munitions and air-launched high-precision weapons have targeted vessels, fuel depots…
🇮🇱 How unhinged, genocidal Israel spiraled to fit its own ‘crazy state’ profile
For decades, Israeli strategic thinkers wielded the concept of "crazy states" as a diagnostic tool to justify preemptive war, subversion, and even annihilation against adversaries.
Today, that same diagnostic framework fits Israel itself far better.
Back in 1971, Israeli political strategist Yehezkel Dror laid out in his book "Crazy St…
🇮🇷🚀 Iranian swift missile recovery leaves Israeli leadership in shock
Israeli military and intelligence officials have been caught off guard by the speed at which Iran has restored its military capabilities following the 2026 war, according to the Jerusalem Post.
During the 40-day war in 2026, the US and Israel launched more than 30,000 strikes against approximately 2,600 military and industrial targets, vastly exc…
🇺🇸How CIA wages shadow war of terror in the Pacific
While the Trump administration has been touting its maritime strikes on boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific as “counternarcotics,” while providing zero evidence, an even darker CIA program is terrorizing innocent fishermen in the Pacific, The Washington Post reports.
Mysterious attacks on Ecuadorian fishing boats near the Galapagos Islands were reportedly c…
🇬🇧🪖 How UK charities covertly support Israel’s Gaza genocide and West Bank crimes
British taxpayers are subsidizing “therapeutic healing” for Israeli soldiers involved in the Gaza genocide, Declassified UK reports.
Declassified has reportedly obtained emails proving that an Israeli veterans group, the Yahalom Foundation, is urging its British supporters to channel their donations via its “registered partner platfor…
Explore our catalogs to follow the Iran war 24/7 in different languages
🇫🇷French 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇩🇪German 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇪🇸Spanish 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇮🇹 Italian 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇵🇹 Portuguese 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇷🇸 Serbian 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇮🇳 Indian 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇬🇧 English 👉 ADD CHANNELS
🇺🇸 Particularly endorsed English channels 👉 ADD CHANNELS
If you are interested in becoming part of these catalogs, please contact @pr
Lockheed Martin blurs the line between civilian and military, turning 5G into future battlespace
The Pentagon military contractor has demonstrated an AI-powered drone-tracking system that uses existing commercial telecommunications infrastructure instead of a separate detection network.
What's known about the system?
🔴 Lockheed Martin's NetSense Airspace Awareness-as-a-Service platform uses the existing 5G network…
💩90❤26🤬15👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @geopolitics_prime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@geopolitics_prime edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 150 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 314 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global @CIG_telegram · 116,656 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 114,198 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
DD Geopolitics @DDGeopolitics · 191,512 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸 @SGTnewsNetwork · 112,837 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
LiveLeak @leaklive · 143,670 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
BRICS News @bricsnews · 152,776 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
The New York Times @nytimes · 176,934 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
The General @GeneralMCNews · 145,915 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
LauraAboli @LauraAbolichannel · 170,875 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela @BellumActaNews · 115,840 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
Disclose.tv @disclosetv · 327,997 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
BioClandestine @bioclandestine · 141,033 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
Gateway Pundit @gatewaypunditofficial · 114,157 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Global News Monitor @warmonitors · 155,323 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
We The Media @WeTheMedia · 146,452 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸 @rnintel · 178,320 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
One America News Network @OANNTV · 148,246 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Bloomberg @bloomberg · 167,081 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Intel Slava @intelslava · 395,572 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 385,761 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Quds News Network @QudsNen · 115,510 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
The Indian Express @indianexpress · 122,432 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
GAZA NOW IN ENGLISH @gazaalanpa · 178,552 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅ @DhawanSir · 142,740 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geopolitics Prime | Iran & Ukraine News Updates” (@geopolitics_prime), 295,148 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geopolitics_prime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
