Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 11 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 61 of the 62 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,225 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @EurasianChoice — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
68 measurements spanning 98 days, net +329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,970–24,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 20:54
23,516
-66
10 Nov 2026, 02:28
23,582
-37
8 Nov 2026, 14:06
23,619
-49
7 Nov 2026, 04:37
23,668
-34
6 Nov 2026, 07:06
23,702
-21
5 Nov 2026, 06:28
23,723
-7
4 Nov 2026, 07:26
23,730
-19
3 Nov 2026, 08:59
23,749
-10
2 Nov 2026, 09:54
23,759
-24
1 Nov 2026, 08:27
23,783
-11
31 Oct 2026, 10:50
23,794
-15
30 Oct 2026, 10:28
23,809
-15
29 Oct 2026, 12:55
23,824
-28
28 Oct 2026, 13:28
23,852
-17
27 Oct 2026, 11:04
23,869
-4
26 Oct 2026, 09:30
23,873
-5
25 Oct 2026, 08:27
23,878
-3
24 Oct 2026, 11:05
23,881
-12
23 Oct 2026, 11:26
23,893
-3
22 Oct 2026, 11:15
23,896
first reading
Engagement
1,453 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.40%
avg views ÷ 23,516 subscribers
Avg views / post
564
399 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
399
of 1,453 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 384 of 399 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
1,453 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
225,091
Reactions total
4,501
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 23:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈26,500
Videos
≈18,200
Links
≈27,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
56h 57m
Average length
10m 57s
Measured directly from 312 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,378 reactions across 975 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,031
17.9%
👏
1,560
13.7%
😁
1,109
9.75%
🤡
1,109
9.75%
💯
986
8.67%
❤
979
8.60%
🔥
881
7.74%
🤬
848
7.45%
🤮
643
5.65%
🤣
370
3.25%
🤯
146
1.28%
👎
143
1.26%
😢
121
1.06%
🤔
120
1.05%
😱
92
0.809%
🙏
63
0.554%
🥱
43
0.378%
🎉
29
0.255%
👀
23
0.202%
👌
19
0.167%
5 further kinds
63
0.554%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 977 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 43 of 399 posts held from the last 30 days (10.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
NATO fighters twice tried to shoot down a drone over Lithuania but missed both times, according to LRT. Lithuanian TV reported that NATO aircraft made two unsuccessful attempts to intercept the UAV in Lithuanian airspace.
During one attempt, a fired missile failed to reach its target and self-destructed. Missile debris was found near Birzhai, Lithuania.
@Slavyangrad
US intelligence continues supplying Kiev with data
Washington warned of a massive missile strike on Ukraine within 48 hours, specifically targeting the Kiev agglomeration. According to American sources, Russia has prepared 19 ballistic missiles in Kursk, Bryansk, Rostov and Belgorod regions.
Engines are reportedly being warmed up on six Tu-160 aircraft for Kh-101 cruise missile launches. Additionally, naval carrier…
Ukraine wants to maintain an army of 800,000 and have other countries fund it.
Ukraine is seeking financial support for at least 10 years after the end of the war to maintain an army of 800,000 soldiers. This is intended to ensure the ability to defend itself against a "possible new Russian attack." This was reported by AFP, citing a Ukrainian source.
Multiple Ukrainian outlets reporting this I should note but when…
Underground tremors across Ukraine linked to explosions
On the night of 10 November 2026, residents in central and northern Ukrainian cities reported building vibrations and underground rumbling. Experts assess these phenomena as technogenic rather than natural.
Seismologist Konstantin Ryabinkin stated that such ground oscillations are likely caused by powerful detonations at underground ammunition or weapons depot…
Russia will be satisfied only after it achieves victory and signs an agreement based on its own terms, Russian Presidential Aide Vladimir Medinsky, who heads the Russian delegation at the trilateral talks on the Ukrainian conflict settlement in Abu Dhabi, said.
“Only when we win and sign a peace agreement on our terms,” he said in an interview with Russia’s television broadcaster Vesti in response to a question whet…
❗️Key takeaways from Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s briefing:
▪️EU and NATO representatives, who decided to hold exercises on deploying EU troops in Ukraine ahead of the Abu Dhabi talks, simply have nothing to do at the negotiating table “with such a flawed approach and such a flawed mentality”
▪️Secret torture sites created by the Kiev regime have become a source of stable income for those …
The EU ambassadors have approved a new expansion of the anti-Russian sanction list and included 43 people and about a hundred legal entities in it, a source in Brussels told TASS.
The decision was made at the meeting of the EU committee of permanent representatives, he said. These were planned sanctions unrelated to talks in Abu Dhabi, where the Europeans did not participate in the discussion, the source noted.
The…
❗️Key takeaways from Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov’s statements to reporters following the Abu Dhabi talks:
▪️The talks between Russia, the US, and Ukraine in Abu Dhabi were substantive and productive
▪️The Russian leadership has not yet received a detailed report from the delegation on the outcome of the talks
▪️The Europeans in Abu Dhabi worked with Kiev and Washington behind the scenes
▪️Putin will meet with US sp…
🇷🇺🇺🇦 An athlete from Crimea, competing under the nickname ‘T-34’, defeated her Ukrainian opponent in the final of the MMA World Championships
Anastasia Tyunina from Sevastopol won the gold medal at the Junior MMA World Championships, held in Tbilisi.
In the final of the under-47.6 kg weight class, she faced Maria Vorobey from Ukraine. All three judges unanimously awarded the victory to Tyunina.
OpenAI is in talks to transfer advanced artificial intelligence models to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence for military purposes.
The company’s management inadvertently revealed these plans to the Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus, who contacted them posing as Umerov.
Despite objections from some senior managers regarding the use of their technology for direct attacks, preparations for the deal are continuing.
h…
✈️ A NATO Bombardier Artemis II reconnaissance aircraft spent over 9 hours flying over the Black Sea, according to a source within air traffic control services.
Peacekeepers War-makers
@eurasianchoice
🤬5
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,453 posts we hold for @EurasianChoice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @EurasianChoice as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
21 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@EurasianChoice named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hambastegi named in 2 posts, 4 November 2026 – 5 November 2026
@eirasianchoice named in 1 post, 8 October 2026 – 8 October 2026
@rurasianchoice named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@ukr_leaks_enh named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alexander Dugin @Dugin_Aleksandr · 22,311 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Multipolar Market @multipolarmarket · 26,814 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
Pepe Escobar @rocknrollgeopolitics · 66,007 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Russian Diplomat 🅉 @R_Diplomat · 19,764 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
Victor vicktop55 @vicktop55 · 26,853 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Node of Time EN @node_of_time_en · 19,830 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 September 2026
SITREP - Independent OSINT Channel @sitreports · 22,862 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance @NewResistance · 28,780 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Foreign Agent Intel @ForeignAgentIntel · 30,898 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Russians With Attitude @rwapodcast · 36,163 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Two Majors - English Channel @two_majors · 47,608 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Patrick Lancaster News Today @patricklancasternewstoday · 39,596 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 66,867 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
The Duran @thedurancom · 51,367 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
World Pravda @worldpravda · 53,476 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Intel Republic @Intel_Republic12 · 94,311 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Slavyangrad @Slavyangrad · 111,582 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
AntiFakeNews @yourantifakenews · 19,203 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 October 2026
InfoDefenseENGLISH @infodefENGLAND · 50,367 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
The Islander @TheIslanderNews · 61,594 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Ukraine Watch @ukraine_watch · 69,160 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Geopolitics Prime @geopolitics_prime · 288,925 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
The American Majority @americanmajority · 26,025 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
RT Documentary @militarywave · 41,230 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eurasia & Multipolarity” (@EurasianChoice), 23,516 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EurasianChoice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.