Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Graham Phillips Journalist

Channel

Graham Phillips Journalist

@grahamwphillips

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

15,695subscribers

-569 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506513099
TypeChannel
Username@grahamwphillips
Created2 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/grahamwphillips

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,69516,26415,979.56 August 202614 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 100 days, net -569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,610–16,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 07:4715,695-10
11 Nov 2026, 08:5815,705-3
9 Nov 2026, 17:3115,708-4
8 Nov 2026, 10:5015,712-3
7 Nov 2026, 03:0615,715-4
6 Nov 2026, 02:1715,719-9
5 Nov 2026, 04:0015,728-4
4 Nov 2026, 05:2515,732-8
3 Nov 2026, 06:5615,740-6
2 Nov 2026, 10:0615,746-5
1 Nov 2026, 11:3015,751-5
31 Oct 2026, 08:4515,756-1
30 Oct 2026, 11:5615,757-4
29 Oct 2026, 14:3915,761-6
28 Oct 2026, 13:5515,767-7
27 Oct 2026, 13:4515,774-7
26 Oct 2026, 10:4615,781-11
25 Oct 2026, 07:3115,792-2
24 Oct 2026, 08:4115,794-9
23 Oct 2026, 07:1715,803first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 15,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,040
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held49 (25 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total60,885
Reactions total1,743
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40m 59s
Average length
4m 06s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,554 reactions across 49 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍94120.7%
🤬83218.3%
💯60313.2%
😁4018.81%
❤3507.69%
🔥2525.53%
🙏2184.79%
👏1252.74%
🫡1232.70%
💔1162.55%
😡1092.39%
🤡922.02%
😢701.54%
🤣691.52%
💩501.10%
🤮481.05%
🤔290.637%
🖕220.483%
👎130.285%
🤯120.264%
22 further kinds791.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,554 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC745 views29 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

I had for a long time thought John Mark Dougan to be a blinking fuckwit, dangerous to Russia primarily because he's a fuckwit. The doxxing of his entire computer and messages though shows him to be much worse than that, it shows him to be a malevolent, petulant agent of chaos here in Russia - making a vindictive false report to the MoD about Texas, who was tragically killed just over a year later, and then turning on…

❤12👏8🤔4👍1🔥1😁1😈1😱1

11 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,210 views41 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Anyone who thinks these tweets mean John Mark Dougan's account has been hacked clearly haven't been following the little tourettes transvestite cretin shit-for-brains that is John Mark Dougan lately.

🤣28🤔5❤4🥱3😈1

7 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈2,160 views85 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

❤️🇷🇺 My new Mariupol reportage!! Life in Mariupol #10 Back to School!

👍60❤22🤮2💩1

6 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈2,230 views154 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Russell Brand, my statement: My thoughts are not with the victims. Not at all. Because there are no victims, none at all - no one was killed, injured, in fact nothing of any note happened to anyone, because if it had they'dve presumably not waited 15, 20 years to report it to the police, and only then after a tv documentary. My thoughts are with those so limited they don't realise all this absolute nonsense is just…

👍83💯46👏8🤔7👎3🤡3🔥2💩1

6 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC≈2,120 views78 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Over 50 civilians now killed in 2 months on the roads of the LNR, Donbass, as Ukrainian Nazis target any civilian transport they can with drone strikes. Among the dead multiple women and young people, strikes on cars, buses, emergency services vehicles.

🤬30🤮27🙏10😭6🔥3👏1🤷‍♂1

5 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC≈2,010 views133 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Russell Brand... good to know things are going so well in the UK we have untold public resources to prosecute a bloke for copping a feel of some boobies in a bar over 20 years ago and sticking it in the wrongun over 15 years ago. Not like scores of actual rapists are arriving on our shores each day illegally....

👍76💯46💩6👏2🖕2🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,800 views93 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Dark days in Donbass at the moment, in the LNR in just this last day, six people killed by Ukrainian Nazis, including 2 teenage boys killed when a Ukrainian Nazi drone struck their car, and 2 sisters in their 30s killed in a separate incident, their car also struck by a Ukrainian Nazi drone. 1 young man, a 19-year-old musician, killed when a passenger bus was hit, photo of that here. A further 20 people wounded, and…

🤬68😢19🤮2❤1👏1🔥1🥴1

2 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC≈2,380 views101 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

School week begins here in Mariupol - a class of young Russians greet the new week! Reportage to come!! 🇷🇺❤️

❤69👍27🤮2😁2🤨1

26 Oct 2026, 11:20 UTC≈3,970 views147 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

And that's goodnight Vucic in Serbia. Interesting why he thought the curse of the poison dwarf wouldn't apply to him....

😁109💯18🤣6❤5🤔4💩3🔥1🤡1

25 Oct 2026, 18:42 UTC≈3,290 views60 reactionsread 14 November 2026

A reminder, subscribe to my channel on Rumble for all my Donbass videos in High Resolution - https://rumble.com/v7h18my-donbass-church-service-for-british-man-killed-in-action-bradley-townsend.html

❤32🙏16🔥8💩2🖕2

22 Oct 2026, 11:05 UTC≈3,450 views149 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇷🇺 That's me renewed to vote for another year in the UK, thanks to the UK Government for the correct noting of my address on their database!

👍83😁38👏11🎉6❤5😎4🔥1🖕1

21 Oct 2026, 19:58 UTC≈2,970 views53 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ForeignAgentIntelVideo

Marines of the 61st Shatter Bastion in Dobropole The 61st Guards Marine Brigade isolated and cleared Dobropole by first wrecking the Byk river bridges and the Bastion underground tunnels from Belozerskaya, then infiltrating assault groups through forest belts under drone cover. Residual enemy elements, reduced to pairs in basements and ruins, were eliminated once logistics were severed and the multi-row anti-tank ob…

👍40❤8🔥4💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @grahamwphillips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Patrick Lancaster News Today
@patricklancasternewstoday · 39,560
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
The Duran
@thedurancom · 51,335
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Brian Berletic's New Atlas Channel
@brianlovethailand · 40,657
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Foreign Agent Intel
@ForeignAgentIntel · 31,402
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Eva Karene Bartlett
@EvaKarene_Bartlett · 32,443
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Jackson Hinkle
@jacksonhinkle · 33,148
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
@NewResistance · 28,780
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q16999575 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelGraham Phillips
DescriptionBritish journalist, propagandist and YouTuber
X / Twitter@GrahamWP_UK
YouTubeUCbwfUqs5Y6_jblWJwMIfRzA

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Graham Phillips Journalist” (@grahamwphillips), 15,695 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grahamwphillips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.