Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoCapo TG

@CryptoCapoTG

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

117,351subscribers

-374 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001864215962
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoCapoTG
DescriptionOfficial and free Telegram channel of @CryptoCapo_ from Twitter. This is the only TG that I have. Beware of scammers. I will never DM you first. Partner: partner.bybit.com/b/cryptocapo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoCapoTG

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

117,351117,725117,5386 August 2026 — 117,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 117,725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 117,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 117,677 subscribers8 August 2026 — 117,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117,542 subscribers10 August 2026 — 117,484 subscribers11 August 2026 — 117,409 subscribers12 August 2026 — 117,351 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117,295–117,781 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:44117,351-58
11 Aug 2026, 08:23117,409-75
10 Aug 2026, 07:13117,484-58
9 Aug 2026, 05:02117,542-91
8 Aug 2026, 01:31117,633-44
7 Aug 2026, 04:41117,677-36
6 Aug 2026, 06:15117,713-12
6 Aug 2026, 02:30117,725no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:23117,725first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.7%
avg views ÷ 117,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
46,600
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.906%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (22 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total605,800
Reactions total5,487
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
865
Videos
2
Links
150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10,464 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,43451.9%
👀2,29822.0%
👍1,77417.0%
🔥9589.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,009reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈16,800 views334 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$BTC Inverse H&S meme? Looking good.

158👀101👍55🔥20

8 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈26,700 views393 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Also, I'll likely start a DCA challenge on Bybit soon, just to show the importance of having a plan and sticking to it. The idea would be to pick one of the coins we've discussed over these months and execute daily buys for a few weeks. Just a reminder: I won't shill leverage or compromise the quality of my content because of this deal. Since it's holiday season, I've been taking things a bit slower lately, traveli

237👍89👀41🔥26

8 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈24,900 views184 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Reposting here the still active launch campaign of my deal with Bybit, just in case you missed it: ​• $10,000 USDT giveaway (200 users get $50 each) • 10% discount on trading fees • Up to $30,000 USDT in rewards ​To participate, just create an account using my link and deposit a minimum of $100 (any asset) ​ partner.bybit.com/b/cryptocapo

105👀33🔥24👍22

7 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈27,000 views435 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​$BTC new attempt to reclaim $65k-66k. ​Let's see if this is the definitive one.

217👀135🔥42👍41

4 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈34,800 views825 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Something I realize more and more, with trading but also with life, is that not everything is under our control, and that more is not necessarily better. For example, I've been bullish since January/February, when price reached the expected main support zone of $60k-70k: [https://t.me/CryptoCapoTG/1344], [https://x.com/CryptoCapo_/status/2019434869001195948?s=20] Since then, 5 months have passed by, which is a lot

532👍149🔥77👀67

28 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC≈47,300 views589 reactionsread 12 August 2026

If this is really a triple bottom at $60k, since February, and all this time has been an accumulation range... can't imagine how strong the expansion will be. No bullish confirmations yet though. Game of patience. https://x.com/i/status/2070421032872079439

301👀133👍99🔥56

23 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC≈62,400 views568 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Solid demand here. It should form a higher low and resume the upwards move soon.

274👀138👍104🔥52

17 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈76,600 views511 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$ETH / $BTC Looking good.

265👀133👍65🔥48

16 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC≈68,400 views420 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Lots of $USDC being minted these days. Next leg higher soon, imo.

211👀100👍61🔥48

16 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈65,400 views222 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

For those asking: Yes, you can create a new account under my link and easily transfer your KYC verification from your old account so you don't have to go through the process again. You just need a different email, and you can transfer your identity instantly from your profile settings (check image).

120👀51👍39🔥12

16 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈47,400 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/CryptoCapo_/status/2077777121515090090?s=20 ​ Partner: https://partner.bybit.com/b/cryptocapo

79👀41🔥19👍13

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @CryptoCapoTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 42,535 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 304,563
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,120
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 254,073
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 146,457
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,541
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,738
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 213,962
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 269,886
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 146,526
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 328,205
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 178,895
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,851
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Bitcoin
@bitcoin · 188,306
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 202,290
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 185,996
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 149,510
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,571
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 341,989
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 315,444
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

x.com7 posts · 26 June 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
partner.bybit.comregistrable domain: bybit.com1 post · 16 July 2026 – 16 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoCapo TG” (@CryptoCapoTG), 117,351 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoCapoTG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.