Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Exy's Lab🧪🥼

Channel

Exy's Lab🧪🥼

@ExysLab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,804subscribers

-1,945 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001500884162
TypeChannel
Username@ExysLab
DescriptionOnly Account: @Exy_BTC Twitter: https://x.com/eth_exy My Price Bot - https://t.me/TruthMarketNews Nothing on this channel is financial advice. Always DYOR and have a Trade strategy.
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ExysLab

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,80427,74926,776.57 August 2026 — 27,749 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,725 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,674 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,638 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,601 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,550 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,532 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,474 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,417 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,310 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,264 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,072 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,056 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,006 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,972 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,951 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,932 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,913 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,871 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,823 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,797 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,776 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,705 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,642 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,596 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,418 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,291 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,181 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,107 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,030 subscribers19 September 2026 — 25,942 subscribers25 September 2026 — 25,804 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,945. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,512–28,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 16:5725,804-138
19 Sept 2026, 02:1825,942-88
16 Sept 2026, 20:2026,030-77
14 Sept 2026, 23:4226,107-74
13 Sept 2026, 10:1526,181-110
11 Sept 2026, 10:1826,291-127
8 Sept 2026, 15:1626,418-178
5 Sept 2026, 11:0026,596-46
3 Sept 2026, 15:1926,642-63
2 Sept 2026, 08:2726,705-42
1 Sept 2026, 08:4526,747-29
31 Aug 2026, 10:2726,776-21
30 Aug 2026, 13:3726,797-26
29 Aug 2026, 13:4326,823-48
28 Aug 2026, 14:0326,871-42
27 Aug 2026, 11:1726,913-19
26 Aug 2026, 13:0426,932-19
25 Aug 2026, 15:2726,951-21
24 Aug 2026, 15:5826,972-34
23 Aug 2026, 02:2727,006first reading

Engagement

157 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 25,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,620
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.921%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 157 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 71 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held157 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total188,393
Reactions total1,734
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,770
Videos
≈56
Links
≈2,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,775 reactions across 153 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥94124.9%
❤90323.9%
👍79521.1%
👏40410.7%
💅2376.28%
custom 52828278430074218212065.46%
🤣1734.58%
😭1163.07%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 157 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,775 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 154 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ExysLab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 157 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,660 views7 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Weekly close matters so much here.

❤2🔥2👍1👏1💅1

27 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,630 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @TruthMarketNewsPhoto

JUST IN: Bitcoin breaks above $85,000 @TruthMarketNews

👍1🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 20:06 UTC≈2,200 views21 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Dealing with some IRL health problems so I’ll try be active here and there but don’t expect the same activity as before. Health is wealth friends remember that. Goal hasn’t changed $50k - $1,000,000 Already 35% - 40% within a month and a bit. Just watch the FOMO I’m more active there for sure. https://fomo.family/r/ETH_Exy

❤12👏4👍2🔥2custom 52828278430074218211

26 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC≈2,200 views7 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://x.com/tradermayne/status/2103900746483994969?s=46&t=tJf-IV6O410_oZGCbdeqcg

❤3👍1👏1🔥1😭1

26 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈2,420 views23 reactionsread 27 September 2026

size beats entry, conviction beats size.

🔥11❤6👏3💅2👍1

25 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC≈2,780 views54 reactionsread 27 September 2026

FOUR HUNDERD THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS

❤24👏12😭8👍5💅5

25 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,810 views43 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

$400,000 / $1,000,000

🔥25❤10👏5custom 52828278430074218212👍1

25 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,800 views26 reactionsread 27 September 2026

If the market allows me to sweep some $PRIORS on FOMO I’ll do it on a dip but I bought a little bit just incase it start moving weird. Any AgentFI token shill me it hard in my DMs. Please and Thank you. https://x.com/priors_trade?s=11&t=tJf-IV6O410_oZGCbdeqcg

❤12👍5🔥5👏2💅2

25 Sept 2026, 04:02 UTC≈4,280 views23 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

“First targets are 30m - 50m without a doubt, watch and learn as this will be the first 250k trade or more all visible from FOMO.” https://fomo.family/profile/ETH_Exy?source=share_link&r=ETH_Exy

👏8❤6👍4🔥4💅1

25 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,660 views20 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥7❤5👍3👏3💅2

25 Sept 2026, 03:50 UTC≈2,570 views24 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

WHAT DID I TELL YOU, A MILLION TIMES. Ansem will hard shill $IMD, now I’m up $100,000 in one day. It’s just the beginning in my opinion there is only 400 holders on FOMO. https://x.com/blknoiz06/status/2103262569263759457?s=46&t=tJf-IV6O410_oZGCbdeqcg

❤8👏6👍4🔥4💅2

Showing the 12 most recent of 157 posts we hold for @ExysLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ExysLab edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,804
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Cielo Announcements
@cieloannouncements · 44,476
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Renzos Alpha
@renzosalpha · 85,334
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Lyxe’s Journal
@cryptolyxecalls · 55,009
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
0xNobler
@CryptoNobler · 50,291
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
MemeCoin Whale Pumps
@MemeCoin_Whale_Pumps · 112,593
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 77,449
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Solana Meme Pump
@SolMemeSignals · 51,640
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Bitcoin Price
@bitcoin_price · 56,324
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exy's Lab🧪🥼” (@ExysLab), 25,804 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExysLab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.