Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr Profit VIP Free

Channel

Dr Profit VIP Free

@drprofitfreebycf

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,904subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586966858
TypeChannel
Username@drprofitfreebycf
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drprofitfreebycf

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@drprofit_trade/114274 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC@drprofitfreebycf/10321 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofitfreebycf/10322 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC@drprofit_trade/114284 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofitfreebycf/10326 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC@drprofit_trade/114335 Aug 2026, 02:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofit_trade/114345 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC@drprofitfreebycf/10328 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofit_trade/114365 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC@drprofitfreebycf/10329 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofit_trade/114375 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC@drprofitfreebycf/10330 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@drprofit_trade9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@drprofit_trade (72)
@vipdrprofit8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@vipdrprofit (53)
@drprofitsignal7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minute@drprofitsignal (70)
@doctorprofits_vip6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975 minutesthis entry (60)
@DoctorProfit_Crypto5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minute@DoctorProfit_Crypto (50)
@DrprofitVip_real5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@DrprofitVip_real (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 28 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 7, the earliest publisher we hold is @drprofitsignal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 6 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,9044,9124,9087 August 2026 — 4,912 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,912 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,910 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,904 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,903–4,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:344,904-6
13 Aug 2026, 10:074,910-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:184,911-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:474,912no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:374,912first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 4,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
933
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held41 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total38,244
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC414 viewsread 12 August 2026

As per the bears, there are still around 55 days of bear market left for the market. And to be straight, I don’t consider myself bullish or bearish in the current area. The reason is very simple: we are in an accumulation phase, which means the bottom is currently being formed. This means we are still in a bear market, but its the end days of the bear market, so someone with a bright mind will understand that the shi

11 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC458 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

$BTC: 15% of existing capital will move into Bitcoin at this level. For everyone wondering, I have invested so far 35% of my existing cash. Once 61,500 area is hit, my orders will activate another 15%, bringing my total positioning to a total of 50% on BTC

11 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC710 viewsread 12 August 2026

The same moment BTC hits 61,500 I will apply ETH buys as well with same size of 15%

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC713 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bitcoin is doing exactly what I told it will do if it gets rejected at 65.400 and it got rejected and that’s why I said 61,500 area will be the next. Because of this , I’m placing multiple buy orders that will be sized 15% of existing capital at the area of 61,500

10 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC891 viewsread 12 August 2026

The videos from Colombia are devastating, just seen some while scrolling through X. Keep the people of Colombia in your prayers friends! 🇨🇴

10 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC927 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

We are very early but this sector of the new finance is going to print new generational wealth. I’m confident that CRCL COIN and ETH are the right bets for the incoming change!

10 Aug 2026, 02:25 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 12 August 2026

BTC right now is like a table tennis match where everyone already knows the outcome. A will beat B. That’s not in question. But B is a good defender, every rally drags on, ball after ball, for hours, then weeks and likely months. It’s like playing against a wall Some betting people expect that B will take at least one point off A before this is over. That point is the last BTC leg down. And everyone knows A will an

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @drprofitfreebycf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,886
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 91,848
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Crypto Insiders Talk
@crypto_insiders · 200,899
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 104,290
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 132,322
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,115
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr Profit VIP Free” (@drprofitfreebycf), 4,904 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drprofitfreebycf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.