China calls on the US to immediately lift its blockade and sanctions on Iran and Cuba. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅

Channel
CCC.io
@cccio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,830subscribers
-832 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001230368984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cccio |
| Description | Stay updated on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Toncoin, XRP, Cardano, finance, wealth, gold, trading, stocks, tokens, altcoin listings, and airdrops, Binance, Coinbase. ✅ Get Pvt group Memberships DM: @verify_Coach |
| Created | 11 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cccio |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 33,830 | -56 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 33,886 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 33,907 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 33,923 | -49 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 33,972 | -88 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 34,060 | -70 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 34,130 | -29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 34,159 | -21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 34,180 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 34,196 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 34,221 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 34,241 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 34,250 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 34,275 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 34,291 | -21 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 34,312 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 34,317 | -33 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 34,350 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 34,374 | -28 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 34,402 | first reading |
Engagement
316 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.65%
- avg views ÷ 33,830 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 897
- 158 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.166%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 159
- of 316 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 61 of 158 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 316 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 141,699 |
| Reactions total | 87 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,300
- Videos
- ≈464
- Links
- ≈6,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 92 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 13.6% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 9.88% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 9.88% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 5.56% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 316 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇺🇸🇨🇳 United States and China reach deal to cut tariffs on $30,000,000,000 worth of goods following Xi Jinping's talks with President Trump. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🌭2
🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iranian President Pezeshkian says "Iran has lost trust in the negotiation process with US." Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🌭3
🇺🇸🇨🇳 US and China agree to create communication channel for emergency AI incidents. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🤔1🙏1
⚠️ PRICE INCREASE REMINDER Just a reminder , the current price will be increased by $200 effective November 1st. If you’re planning to join at the current price, make sure to secure your access before October ends. ⏳ 🔥 Current Price → Until October 31st 📈 +$200 → From November 1st Don’t wait until the price changes. 🔒
THEY WAITED. THEY DOUBTED. WE TRADED. While everyone else was sitting on the sidelines waiting for confirmation... PRIVATE CLUB WAS ALREADY IN. 🚀 ⚡️ #ATH +38% ✅⚡️ #LPT +16% ✅⚡️ #FET +17% ✅⚡️ #API3 +48% ✅ FOUR MOVES. REAL RESULTS. 🔥 And these are the trades people see AFTER they move. Imagine being inside when the setups are actually shared. 👀 🔒 COACH PRIVATE CLUB LIFETIME ACCESS ⏳ Limited slots 🔥 Special discount…
❤1
Ondo Finance Launches Ondo Intelligent Portfolios Based on BlackRock Strategy Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
Bitcoin ETF inflows slow to $191M as six-day streak reaches $2.8B Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🇺🇸 $2.8 trillion Citi says investors should buy the next US stock market pullback. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🇺🇸 Federal Reserve proposes new regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🇰🇵 Bitget crypto exchange says the $350 million hack is likely linked to North Korea. Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
🇺🇸🇮🇷 US rejects Iranian proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz Powered by — 🥳 @Coach ✅
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 316 posts we hold for @cccio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,114#1
@coach · 23,215#2
@thebull_crypto · 174,931#3
@WatcherGuru · 628,516#4
@wiseadvicebysumit · 170,339#5
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 324,743#6
@Bitmex_Coach · 1,944#7
@kimoncrypto · 37,722#8
@cointelegraph · 333,873#9
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,355#10
@cryptobullet · 67,439#11
@unfolded · 117,442#12
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 179,783#13
@cryptoamanclub · 104,044#14
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,481#15
@news_crypto · 100,019#16
@whalescryptovip · 206,300#17
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 91,559#18
@icodrops · 42,698#19
@WiseAnalyze · 6,226#20
@VikingsAnalyst · 37,566#21
@trade_bulls · 4,966#22
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938#23
@ForextradingsfreeCF · 2,063#24
@Crypto_world_signalss · 6,554#25
@marginwhales · 11,047#26
@CryptoCoinsCoachCF · 4,565#27
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875#28
@White_Bullss · 50,267#29
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 99,412#30
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 29,757#31
@CryptoEase · 5,657#32
@Forex_Tradings · 19,689#33
@cryptosignals · 19,310#34
@cryptotrader · 13,116#35
@dogs · 7,065,215#36
@Crypto_Swings · 10,830#37
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,390#38
@rose · 85,706#39
@Whalesguide · 200,022#40
@binance_announcements · 3,415,966#41
@thecryptoexpress · 258,705#42
@CryptoKlondike · 59,571#43
@BCUSAReal · 148,789#44
@whale_alert_io · 300,107#45
@WhaleSniper · 60,264#46
@next10xgem1 · 329,566#47
@whalebotalerts · 144,669#48
@TCGFORYOU · 74,783#49
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,156#50
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,803#51
@open4profit · 80,058#52
@PAIDROSE · 141,377#53
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 58,182#54
@REKTbinance · 20,084#55
@gorilla_crypto · 192,465#56
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,021#57
@CryptoCove · 29,047#58
@ggshot · 93,344#59
@RosePremiumm · 145,445#60
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 99,497#61
@BackcomGlobal · 25,510#62
@binancekillers · 313,376#63
@CryptoEmpire_Signal · 27,447#64
@Insider_leak_of_the_day · 7,332#65
@cmcal_bot · 30,553#66
@wcsechanneL · 14,864#67
@crypto_freemium · 11,743#68
@DenofhonorbyCF · 2,306#69
@WallMonitor · 7,252#70
@thedude0ne · 6,598#71
@Market · 9,975#72
@GaCryptOfficial · 37,602#73
@binance_360 · 101,678#74
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 24,152#75
@wublockchainenglish · 236,023#76
@delbert_trading · 5,905#77
@cryptoquant_official · 55,749#78
@cryptogg · 101,711#79
@bitcoinexpertindia · 38,552#80
@KingChart · 5,348#81
@BitMEXSniper · 12,746#82
@Therealdrprofit · 54,086#83
@WhaleTracker · 17,181#84
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,588#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,114
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
@coach · 23,215
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
@kimoncrypto · 37,722
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@coingape · 23,136
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 99,412
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@thebull_crypto · 174,931
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 29,757
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
@cmcal_bot · 30,553
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@cryptobullet · 67,439
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@CryptoWorldNews · 42,335
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 99,497
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 324,743
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,630
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
@BackcomGlobal · 25,510
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
@OfficialCryptoPatel · 26,645
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
@CryptoEmpire_Signal · 27,447
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@CryptoKlondike · 59,571
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 179,783
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Bitcoin_Insights · 32,384
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 31,309
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@kryptodeutsch · 62,557
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@WhaleSniper · 60,264
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@whalebotalerts · 144,669
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@WhaleDV · 28,638
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CCC.io” (@cccio), 33,830 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cccio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.