Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Forex Tradings

Channel

Forex Tradings

@Forex_Tradings

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,339subscribers

-732 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161342217
TypeChannel
Username@Forex_Tradings
DescriptionEducational content, not a financial advice. Contact @ataladmin for Premium club admission https://forms.gle/AbFK2wR9sepiRMGd6
Created18 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Forex_Tradings

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Forex_Tradings/20326 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC@cryptotrader/1949127 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@Forex_Tradings/20336 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC@cryptotrader/1950130 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@Forex_Tradings/20337 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC@cryptotrader/1950231 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@Forex_Tradings/20339 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC@cryptotrader/195043 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@Forex_Tradings/20340 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC@cryptotrader/195053 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@Forex_Tradings/20342 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC@cryptotrader/195074 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@cryptotrader14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (14–0)
@cryptosignals14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@cryptosignals (14–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @cryptosignals. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

19,33920,07119,7056 August 20269 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -732. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,229–20,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:2019,339-4
8 Nov 2026, 16:0019,343-12
7 Nov 2026, 12:4919,355-10
6 Nov 2026, 14:1019,365-2
5 Nov 2026, 11:2419,367-8
4 Nov 2026, 10:0519,375-11
3 Nov 2026, 09:1819,386-3
2 Nov 2026, 08:2519,389-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:5519,393-9
31 Oct 2026, 07:0619,402-8
30 Oct 2026, 09:1619,410-18
29 Oct 2026, 09:3019,428-6
28 Oct 2026, 09:2919,434-9
27 Oct 2026, 12:4719,443-8
25 Oct 2026, 13:5419,451-4
24 Oct 2026, 11:0019,455-4
23 Oct 2026, 13:4819,459-9
22 Oct 2026, 12:4719,468-9
21 Oct 2026, 09:4919,477-7
20 Oct 2026, 04:5019,484first reading

Engagement

147 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.22%
avg views ÷ 19,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
622
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.473%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 147 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held147 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total40,456
Reactions total125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,510
Videos
≈40
Links
≈4,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

242 reactions across 74 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14057.9%
🔥5422.3%
💯2711.2%
⚡218.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 65 posts held from the last 30 days (1.54%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC413 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#BTC Did i tell that structure is bearish? Always stay ahead with 👑Atal @Cryptosignals

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC396 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Don't panic https://x.com/CRYPTOATAL/status/2120155410154115169?s=19

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC523 viewsread 11 November 2026

5 years ago today $BTC made its 2021 high 📈 https://x.com/CRYPTOATAL/status/2120096607991406829?a=G_6muF_M60rOR2Og9gw&s=19

10 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC536 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#BTC Structure remains bearish. Expect a sweep of stops below $73,620, with potential downside expansion into the H4 FVG at $71,142 – $69,950—which conveniently aligns with the major 2021 cycle top level. History check: 2022 carved its cycle bottom in November. Will 2026 repeat the script? @cryptosignals

10 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ZK Swing Buy Setup Our last $ZK setup delivered a flawless 128% profit and the anticipated October–November correction has played out exactly as mapped. The next expansion phase kicks off around November 13 and we are structurally targeting 2x–5x gains. ZK has fully reset and is now resting directly on our primary 3D demand block. We have a massive volume void sitting above current prices. Every dip over the next 4…

🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC331 viewsread 11 November 2026

$60k coming? Lol https://x.com/CRYPTOATAL/status/2119699268437262432?a=I0MYWhaU18AW3c7O9_s&s=20

10 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC398 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#ETC Daily Setup 📊 Well lost its $7.08 support level, but the recent $6.52 dip stopped right before hitting a major untouched demand zone from Aug. We might see one final dip below $6.52 to trigger stop-losses and tap into that strong buying zone at $5.8 – $6.48. Keep your spot buy orders resting there just in case. Targets: $7.55 – $8.20 - $8.78 - $9.50 Invalidation - Day close below 5.62 @cryptosignals

10 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC399 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#SEI Buy Setup 📊 Just completed a full round-trip from $0.0865 back into its mid-September BOS+ demand box ($0.0415–$0.0460). Yesterday's $0.0415 low stopped just above the untouched August DFVG & OB+ ($0.0385–$0.0408) Daily close above $0.0510–$0.0545 OB- flips bearish order flow. The Magnet: Untapped DFVG - pockets at $0.0565–$0.0608 and the $0.0610–$0.0640 OB- @cryptosignals

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 20:07 UTC411 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Your laptop becomes an ATM once you master the charts. @cryptosignals

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC547 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

The "$60k" chorus is getting louder. Good. 🧠📊 ​At $81.2k, the crowd was euphoric while we booked 80% profits. At $73.5k—right inside two stacked Monthly FVGs (MFVG)—those same voices are screaming for $60k. ​Fear = Liquidity: Smart money needs retail panic to fill heavy spot bids at $73.5k–$74k. ​Late Shorts = Fuel: Bottom-shorters are stacking the exact buy-stops needed for the next squeeze right as USDT.D rejec…

💯3

9 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC505 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Fed & Macro Playbook — 3 Scenarios + Our Expectation 📊 ​With no FOMC meeting in November, this week's inflation data & Fedspeak decide the odds for the Dec 8–9 Fed decision: ​🟢 Bullish (Dovish Relief): Soft print cools Dec hike odds. USDT.D rejects the 7.25% -OB and $BTC reclaims $75.6k–$76.6k to start the squeeze to $80k–$84.9k+. 🟡 Neutral (In-Line): Both-sided leverage sweep around $73.5k–$74.2k ($BTC) before gr…

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC482 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

We recently launched Premium Annual Plan at more than Affordable Price. https://forms.gle/AbFK2wR9sepiRMGd6

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @Forex_Tradings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTCAnonymous Poll378 voters

Did u guys Shorted the Most Hyped Coin #HYPE ?

  1. Yes 💵29%
  2. No Fml73%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals · 19,040
#1
Crypto Trades
@cryptotrader · 12,778
#2
Crypto Swings®
@Crypto_Swings · 10,617
#3
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
#4
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 183,177
#5
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,216
#6
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 162,876
#7
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 145,028
#8
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 308,245
#9
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 25,838
#10
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,424
#11
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 321,132
#12
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,653
#13
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 247,150
#14
unfolded.
@unfolded · 116,604
#15
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · 74,322
#16
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 174,117
#17
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 100,443
#18
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 198,990
#19
Crypto TA King 🐋
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,440
#20
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,187
#21
Cryptosignals/Forex_Tradings Premium Free
@ForextradingsfreeCF · 2,064
#22
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 36,727
#23
Crypto Swings Den of Honor Free
@DenofhonorbyCF · 2,306
#24
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 139,732
#25
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 136,767
#26
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,336
#27
WESLAD Research 📊
@wcsechanneL · 14,236
#28
Crypto Heist With AB
@cryptoheistwithab · 1,969
#29
Signal Palace
@signalpalace · 3,611
#30
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,613
#31
📉 Wise Analyze 📈
@WiseAnalyze · 6,126
#32
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 182,238
#33
🅣🅡🅐🅓🅔 🅑🅤🅛🅛🅢™
@trade_bulls · 4,869
#34
Crypto Leaks By Drvkich
@cryptoleakss · 7,702
#35
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,738
#36
CFTopTrading
@CFTopTrading · 38,591
#37
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,453
#38
King's Charts™
@KingChart · 5,226
#39
Trade & Grow (Crypto) HWP
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,091
#40
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 294,374
#41
CryptoQuant
@cryptoquant_official · 55,481
#42
Margin Whales®
@marginwhales · 10,828
#43
Bitcoin Expert India
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,650
#44
CCC.io
@cccio · 32,744
#45
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀
@JackDorseyCoins · 21,691
#46
Coach
@coach · 22,744
#47
Rose 🌹
@rose · 84,971
#48
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,289
#49
Bitmex
@Bitmex_Coach · 1,895
#50
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 35,318
#51
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 56,825
#52
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,205,251
#53
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 295,637
#54
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 141,903
#55
Whale Sniper
@WhaleSniper · 59,238
#56
Open4profit
@open4profit · 76,795
#57
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 28,708
#58
Cointelegraph
@cointelegraph · 325,603
#59
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 94,786
#60
CryptoQuant Alert
@cryptoquant_alert · 69,850
#61
D Man
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 96,405
#62
Crypto India Haveli
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 56,906
#63
Crypto Notes
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,394
#64
Market
@Market · 9,943
#65
Delbert's Trading Team
@delbert_trading · 5,774
#66
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 99,683
#67
EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 89,146
#68
Earn With Sapna
@EarnWithSapna · 47,491
#69
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 126,428
#70
BitMEX Sniper
@BitMEXSniper · 12,430
#71
Richard Temple
@CryptoRichard · 12,767
#72
Crypto Swings®
@realcryptoswings · 1,514
#73
CF Leverage Trading VIP Free
@TradingbyCFfreeCF · 971
#74
Insider leak of the day
@Insider_leak_of_the_day · 7,190
#75
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,423,087
#76
PushpendraSinghOfficial
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,194
#77
Binance liquidations
@REKTbinance · 19,545
#78
Backcom.io Global
@BackcomGlobal · 22,843
#79
Signal Crypto AyoungLam ( SCAL )
@tradeallcoin · 19,599
#80

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals · 19,040
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀
@JackDorseyCoins · 21,691
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,216
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 183,177
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Profit Coach™
@cryptoprofitcoach · 24,244
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner
@EyesCryptoScanner · 21,428
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
Trade & Grow (Crypto) HWP
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,091
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 88,743
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 25,838
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
CCC.io
@cccio · 32,744
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,424
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Coach
@coach · 22,744
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
D Man
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 96,405
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 308,245
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
CFTopTrading
@CFTopTrading · 38,591
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 174,117
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 56,825
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Binance Signals TURKEY🎖🚀
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,120
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
Krypto | Finanzen | Politik
@kryptodeutsch · 62,271
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
techandtarget
@techandtarget · 21,898
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 35,318
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
GreenCrypto 🌕
@getgreencrypto · 15,337
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
Crypto Empire Signal™
@CryptoEmpire_Signal · 26,775
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Forex Tradings” (@Forex_Tradings), 19,339 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Tradings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.