Channel
@kazukigambles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
680subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001829628306 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kazukigambles |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kazukigambles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 680 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 680 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 11 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As always, no updates = no changes Few truly see what’s ahead, and even fewer are prepared... Once the analysis is done, the best trade is to switch off until the market moves again. Save your focus and energy for when the real moves begin. I hope you have had a good weekend! “Silence is not absence, it is clarity.”
❤1👌1
GOODMORNING MADAFAKERS
🤣2👍1
sorry for being inactive posting broskies, even im inactive in posting i gamble some on silent, i follow this channel and print good with his calls check his latest share https://t.me/PhatFookszn/826
high risk high blood !!! LFG!
https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1899741688689463342 BRO this guy is so fcking GAMBLER 1,877 liquidation
moreeeee
https://x.com/lookonchain/status/1899729828460536125 wow another LONG? last time market pump after he long big $$ with high risk lets see CPI in 4hrs
Goodmorning broskies is this guy insidor? 🤣
❤2👍1
https://x.com/DegenerateNews/status/1895990765811331201 dang big $$$ on long
i know some team doing this shit 4 -6 times a day when ETH is alive profiting $$$ from clogged and leave the project to deploy another coin time to time base on TWEET
what will happen to this tax collected from clogged? + let's add 1-20 wallets bought the bottom who sold 1e-3e ( or more ) btw this is from ETH, i still dont get it. who's winning here? dev/team or the community ? saw so many coins do this shit repeatedly and ended clogged tax not used ( in 1-10 coin deployed only 2 team doing it right to use the tax collected ) someone say they use it to book a call, or pay other…
tried some eth degens still no volume kek
🍌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kazukigambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,513,752 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kAzuki GAMBLE's | ETH | BSC” (@kazukigambles), 680 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kazukigambles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.