huge IQ and gayness tests going on @ base right now

Channel
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,695subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001576837895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ihzanswhaleschool |
| Description | personal diary nothing posted here is financial advice Twitter: https://twitter.com/ihzn7 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ihzanswhaleschool |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 29,695 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 29,690 | +8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 29,682 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 29,679 | +82 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 29,597 | -18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 29,615 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 29,603 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:33 | 29,628 | +18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 29,610 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 29,606 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 29,614 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 29,622 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 29,640 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 29,650 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 29,659 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 29,651 | +37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 29,614 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 29,638 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 29,639 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 29,643 | first reading |
Engagement
173 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.48%
- avg views ÷ 29,695 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,810
- 124 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 124
- of 173 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 173 (30 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 349,013 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 05:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,640
- Videos
- ≈97
- Links
- ≈2,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
gm, shill some (evm) gems
seems like this went under radar - hookr integrated $WTH tech into their launchpad (15m project) and even uniswap interacted with it https://x.com/uniswap/status/2100697575464595938?s=46
whats happening over there with ZEC
i have once again bridged to some weirdass sidechain
https://x.com/binance/status/2102371568668357071 it looks ike binance listened to my crcl shill and bought themselves arc eco slightly bouncing on this news - lets see if it can sustain the uptrend
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://x.com/REK/status/2101771246962938155 we are actually cooked
can we get rid of this stupid launchpad meta + synthetic pairs bullshit
gm comfy in arc eco
think good chance atleast one of these survives/goes on a run on ARC
also unraped here and finally in good profits with all markets sending think CRCL will be interesting to keep an eye on it with ARC launch - waiting für the first onchain metrics to see what their current revenue/yearly revenue is
Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @ihzanswhaleschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@midacalls · 54 postsGem Asylum
@GemAsylum · 1002 postsALL CALLS
@justsomecalls · 4,9942 postsTo Millions - Gambles🐋 赌博
@millionsgems · 12,2672 postsACH 🧲🧲🧲
@ACH_Calls · 8641 postAlpha Club
@AlphaCrossChain · 781 postChinu | Announcements
@ChinuCoinAnnouncements · 61 postDADDY’S CALLS
@DaddysCalls · 1,2351 postELtubruk.
@ELtubruk · 2141 postГреча Принтит
@Gre4cha_crypto · 8101 postEv's Alphas
@HardSnipe · 11,8831 postLevis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 48,1421 postLotto Mania Announcements
@LottoManiaAnnouncements · 591 postMacull Research
@MacullResearch · 2451 postMaster’s Journal
@Masters_journal · 1,7821 postNym’s Domain
@NymsDomain · 1,0691 postSUS ETH Calls (and on-chain Investigations)
@SUSCALLSETH · 1,6091 postSapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,4291 post🦉SOCRATES CALLS
@SocratesCalls · 2,0711 postTheCatWorld Official Announcement
@TheCatWorldAnn · 311 postKaneki’s Void
@WhispersOfTheChain · 2841 postXelto‘s ETH Plays
@XeltoETH · 271 postMEOWS
@catladymeows · 1761 postCheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,8921 postCJ Crypto Calls 💎
@cjcryptocalls · 1101 postDEGEN GEMS! REKT’S Crypto Journey
@degenshit100x · 5,8431 postDystoz Calls
@dystoz · 391 postFaded Crypto ARC
@fadedarc · 5,2201 postGucci’s Not Gay Calls
@gucciscalls · 1,3531 postDisclipline and Desire
@gupgupgambles · 1711 postHocks Journal
@hockscalls · 9531 postthe js cult 🔱
@jsdao · 37,9391 postKomaru Gamble
@komarugamble · 4201 postMarcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,6951 postPrints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,1411 postTiger King
@tigerkingchannel · 91 postVenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,7031 postWulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,5541 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906#1
@maythouscalls · 35,747#2
@diaryofapes · 4,677#3
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,904#4
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,892#5
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890#6
@senzu_calls · 6,790#7
@venomcalls · 35,703#8
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984#9
@GWSai · 2,891#10
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542#11
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,332#12
@TheReaperGems · 15,374#13
@eyecrosschain · 12,201#14
@sugarydick · 33,742#15
@eezzyjournal · 41,000#16
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,785#17
@MonkeCage · 11,184#18
@QwertysQuants · 22,164#19
@DreamCalls100x · 10,755#20
@smolinsanity · 14,361#21
@inbredhq · 7,288#22
@senzugambles · 1,883#23
@degenshit100x · 5,843#24
@solsticedegens · 6,822#25
@SaiCalls · 2,942#26
@CTtradec · 12,771#27
@HardSnipe · 11,883#28
@arcanegems · 47,229#29
@watisdes · 30,089#30
@WatcherGuru · 627,715#31
@maythousdegens · 15,493#32
@jamiescave · 13,490#33
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,777#34
@spidersjournal · 32,968#35
@NeoCallss · 17,486#36
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,446#37
@defigreco · 6,393#38
@MultiChain1000x · 9,497#39
@printspress · 19,141#40
@DegenSeals · 34,271#41
@thecasinoeye · 6,380#42
@GemsofRa · 17,853#43
@brozinkers · 54,016#44
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,778#45
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,341#46
@noodlestrade · 6,372#47
@degendivers · 3,322#48
@TheIcebergCasino · 3,440#49
@SapphireCalls · 12,429#50
@x666calls · 17,742#51
@TheIllestShills · 4,791#52
@chiggajogambles · 8,767#53
@kobesgambles · 16,074#54
@mad_apes_call · 80,345#55
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,085#56
@fadedarc · 5,220#57
@WastaDegeneracy · 14,237#58
@Donkey_Calls · 1,057#59
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178#60
@kvontrades · 3,585#61
@defiant1s · 82,222#62
@dylansdirtydiary · 8,521#63
@waldosalpha · 5,055#64
@notxoraboat · 4,681#65
@HydraPlays · 2,138#66
@degensgems · 15,169#67
@wifechangingcallss · 6,225#68
@CryptiCMS · 4,162#69
@Luffysgemcalls · 11,051#70
@CryptoUpdates · 11,785#71
@lowtaxbsc · 40,617#72
@pswoleplays · 4,177#73
@cryptocurrency_media · 62,113#74
@GabbensCalls · 10,806#75
@hocksgamble · 2,145#76
@Noodles_calls · 11,770#77
@AdamsCryptoPlayground · 7,605#78
@ryoshigamble · 38,003#79
@CraftyGambles · 10,347#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,542
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@maythouscalls · 35,747
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@teammacnbtc · 33,036
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@venomcalls · 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@eezzyjournal · 41,000
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@dogendojo · 35,314
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@lowtaxsolana · 42,531
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
@ZoomerfiedNews · 22,446
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,785
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@bagcalls · 59,801
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
@defiant1s · 82,222
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@sugarydick · 33,742
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@cryptocurrency_media · 62,113
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@ProfitsPlays · 25,789
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
@eunicalls · 29,241
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@arcanegems · 47,229
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
@spidersjournal · 32,968
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026
@marketsAlpha · 25,428
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@TreeNewsFeed · 34,778
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@cieloannouncements · 44,707
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳” (@ihzanswhaleschool), 29,695 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ihzanswhaleschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.