Channel
@noodlestrade
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,496subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001559038987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noodlestrade |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noodlestrade |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 6,496 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 6,505 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 6,516 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 6,516 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 49.4% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 24.4% | |
| 🤓 | 16 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 5.77% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.92% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.28% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Wrong War : The full breakdown of who won, who lost, and why America keeps winning battles and losing everything else. 👇 https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2058966751753470446?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
👍5❤3
Some of you ask why I cover geopolitics now. Because every major market move this year started with a geopolitical trigger, not an earnings report. In January 2025, with markets pricing in a frictionless Trump presidency, we flagged deteriorating macro conditions. The tariff shock followed. On April 6, at peak fear, we identified the entry point. Markets reversed within days. In January 2026, with oil at $60, we …
❤10
What Looks Like a Pump and Dump Is Something Far Worse: Crypto was supposed to be different https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2054235663206339064?s=46&t=ONYZLkvb1kOwI9Cg7eYq4Q
❤1
On December 23, 2025, I wrote that MicroStrategy selling equity while the stock was weak was not a sign of strength. It was a sign of stress. I said the priority had shifted from growth to survival. Five months later, Saylor confirmed it himself.. A Thread: https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2051908216389357610?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ And today an in-depth analysis will be published on : https://noodlesresear…
👍3🐳1👏1
*Correct link Here to join the waiting list https://noodlesresearch.com/terminal
There’s a new metric in town that will be more viral than the Fear and Greed Index. We built it. It’s called the Noodles Cycle Index. https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2051706771451130300?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
❤2👀1
Three weeks ago the most serious defense think tank in America (Institute for the Study of War + American Enterprise Institute) published the report that changes the Taiwan picture. For the first time they state in writing that the Iran war functions as strategic cover for China. While Washington has three carriers in the Middle East and zero political bandwidth for the Pacific, Beijing accelerates: PLA Navy doubled…
🔥8❤3
People think I enjoy being bearish. That it’s a hobby, a personality trait. It’s not. Every serious investor knows: real money is made in bull markets. That’s exactly why we built the Noodles Terminal. To identify the historical patterns that signal when to position, not guess. For now, the metrics are clear. This is our first dedicated crypto research piece: noodlesresearch.com/research/btc-peaked-126k-what-comes…
❤8👏5🤓2
Bitcoin cycle 4 peaked at $126,000 on October 6, 2025. Returns measured halving to peak across four cycles: +9,200%, +2,900%, +700%, +97%. The compression is consistent and structural, roughly 70 to 85 percent less per cycle. NUPL at 28.6, Loss Supply Deviation at 1.40, Stablecoin Cycle Index at 47 percent cash. Three independent frameworks, same distribution signature. Full analysis, invalidation triggers, and wh…
❤6💯2👍1👏1
Something broke in January 2025, markets have stopped pricing fundamentals. They price one account, on one platform. A structural piece on what changed since 2025, and why the mental model most allocators still use is already obsolete. https://noodlesresearch.com/research/the-one-man-tape
❤4🤓4
Imagine opening your terminal and knowing exactly where we stand. Crypto cycle phase. Macro regime. Equity stress. Geopolitical risk. Four seconds. Four numbers. No noise, no interpretation needed. This is what we built. Early access open. Request Early Access: noodlesresearch.com https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2045251682964017477?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
❤4🤓1
People keep saying “ 10 October 2025 was the largest liquidation ever.” True in nominal terms, not in real ones. https://x.com/criptopaul/status/2004551661469974920?s=46&t=pgcBgkV7YJcnGceRIIeVaQ
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noodlestrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 168,158 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Noodles 2025 Market Intelligence Event” (@noodlestrade), 6,496 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noodlestrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.