Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OverDose Gems Calls

Channel

OverDose Gems Calls

@overdose_gems_calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,785subscribers

-197 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444337124
TypeChannel
Username@overdose_gems_calls
DescriptionThis channel calls as early as possible new Crypto DEFI gems found on Uniswap, ETH, SOL, BASE and more. Education only, Not Financial advice. DYOR. Owner : @od_100 My only official socials are: t.me/overdose_gems_calls & x.com/overdose_AI
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/overdose_gems_calls

Growth

47,78547,98247,883.56 August 2026 — 47,982 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,967 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,953 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,934 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,903 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,877 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,860 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,843 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,817 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,785 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,755–48,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:4347,785-32
14 Aug 2026, 22:1647,817-26
13 Aug 2026, 12:0847,843-17
12 Aug 2026, 12:1847,860-17
11 Aug 2026, 09:4447,877-26
10 Aug 2026, 08:2847,903-31
9 Aug 2026, 05:0147,934-19
8 Aug 2026, 02:5647,953-14
7 Aug 2026, 02:2247,967-15
6 Aug 2026, 06:1747,982first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.6%
avg views ÷ 47,785 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.866%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (8 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total82,450
Reactions total714
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,890
Videos
27
Links
1,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,506 reactions across 21 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
78051.8%
🔥31220.7%
👍1419.36%
💯996.57%
🤣573.78%
😁352.32%
👀161.06%
👏130.863%
👎110.73%
🥴80.531%
🙏70.465%
🌭40.266%
🥱40.266%
❤‍🔥30.199%
🗿30.199%
😭30.199%
🤯20.133%
10.066%
10.066%
🎄10.066%
5 further kinds50.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,506reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 21 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @overdose_gems_calls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈6,220 views64 reactions9 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Did we catch the TOP performing coin in the last week amongst the top 100 coins? The answer is yes. Did I call the bottom of this coin multiple times here on the channel? The answer is yes Sometimes the easiest wins with size are right in front of you, 2x + already on $PUMP and revenue wise the R/R is still VERY decent ====== ⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ DM ʏᴏᴜ |⚠️ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ | Nᴏᴛ ꜰɪɴᴀɴᴄɪᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠɪᴄᴇ. I ᴍɪɢʜᴛ ɢᴇᴛ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜ

🔥3818🤣5💯3

5 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈9,530 views77 reactions10 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

$PUMP is now almost double the price since I shared my long thesis a month ago. And if you count all the previous thesis posts then it's even more than that. wen you look at majors this joins our $HYPE win which has been printing when everything else was going down, And our $UNI long which is up ~30% since I posted about it last month. The crazy thing is how sometimes the easiest trades are right in front of your

49🔥17👏5🤣5❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC≈14,300 views177 reactions11 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

A hour ago CZ tweeted that he might buy a few shitcoins (memes) on BSC in the next few weeks.. If you've been in the trenches long enough you know that once CZ & Binance decide to push their ecosystem, the shitcoins there tend to fly harder than most chains simply cuz they have an unlimited amount of funds. All eyes on BSC, gonna make sure that we catch those crime coins / alphas / whatever they gonna pump

102👍33🔥23👀7👎4❤‍🔥2🗿2🤣2

28 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC≈12,800 views81 reactions13 Starsread 16 August 2026

We're still deep in the thin liquidity phase. You can see it easily wen a new narra / chain pops up -> everything else gets dumped. Doesn't even matter if your coin is solid or nah trenchers HAVE to rotate because the liq is finite & there are barely any new traders in the trenches rn.. It's the same degens moving from one narra to the next, and every rotation leaves a trail of dead charts and pvps behind it. We

39👍20💯13🥱4😭3🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈14,500 views89 reactions12 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Trading utilities on Robinhood feels so good lately. First we got more than 6x with my $ARROW call that I made here on the channel And now, I woke up to my $WOOD call hitting 30m! From 10m wen I called it to 30m in a week, wen was the last time we saw a utility on SOL doing that? Now is the time that you need dedicate every single minute you have to researching and hunting. MAKE SURE that you have notifications

58🔥14🥴8👍7👏2

20 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈12,300 views68 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

After an endless amount of posts about the $PUMP bottom, FINALLY our $PUMP bags are moving up. It's one of the only longs that I've been so vocal about despite it going down for months, simply due to the revenue vs MC and the R/R that looks very good here. Up 30% in a week, seems like a good ride so far The long is still open (long term) ====== ⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ DM ʏᴏᴜ ꜰɪʀsᴛ |⚠️ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ | Nᴏᴛ ꜰɪɴᴀɴᴄɪᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠɪᴄᴇ

🔥3218🤣11🙏4👎3

18 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈12,800 views158 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

That's why I love Robinhood so much, and why I truly believe not only is it here to stay, but it might dominate the next cycle. Vlad (the CEO) noticed that his recent actions hurt the memes on his chain. Instead of ignoring it or avoiding responsibility like most founders, he took the initiative and tweeted this to reassure everyone that RH is for both shitcoins and utility coins. It's so refreshing because, up unt

98💯24🤣16👍10🔥6🌭2🗿1🤪1

15 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈12,400 views65 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

It's just crazy to see how strong $ARROW is, especially during those major dips across most of the Robinhood coins. Ever since I called it here on the channel at 5-6m I liked the narrative, and now they are trading at ~20mil and it seems like they are adding new features and are actually being noticed (and added) by others us well. What a cook for the Overdose Fam ======= ⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ DM ʏᴏᴜ ꜰɪʀsᴛ |⚠️ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ɢʀ

37🔥18👏5🤣5

13 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC≈11,400 views68 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

When I posted here about $VEX 3 days ago - the main reason was the big interaction they got (Solana, Arbitrum & Virtuals). And now, once again (during a dip which is very rare!) Virtuals directly quotes SOLANA and Shills $VEX .. Correct me if I'm wrong but it's not something that we usually see, especially on a coin SUB 10mil MC.. Time will tell - it's nearly our entry price so I keep holding. ======= ⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇ

34💯12🤣8👍3😁3👎2🔥2🤯2

13 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC≈9,740 views54 reactions16 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

If we are walking through history of new chains - usually the best early performing memes are those with the highest mindshare, especially if the meme "makes sense" So if I go through Uniswap's latest post about Robinhood: - CASHCAT -> We already hold it since it had 5m in the lp, now 11m+. It's the biggest meme currently on the chain and that's why I said several times it's the most important chart there - JUGGER

36🔥9🤣3🙏31😁1🙊1

13 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈7,570 views49 reactions8 Starsread 16 August 2026

If you go back to my previous $JUGGERNAUT post (Quoted here) and look at the picture - today's 70% pump / bounce will make a lot of sense. Roughly a year ago Vlad (Robinhood CEO) said in his OWN WORDS that $JUGGERNAUT is his favorite meme.. So this is already public info, now the main question is - will he say it again? Yesterday a shitcoin pumped ~ 800% based on a rumor that Vlad might have bought a few dollars o

👍2514💯61🔥1🤣1🫡1

11 Jul 2026, 18:05 UTC≈8,430 views122 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

A few days ago when I was posting here about the 5.2mil LP of $CASHCAT I thought it was impressive af. Now the liquidity is 11.7mil(!!), tell me when we had anything remotely close to that on $SOL? I'm spending most of my days researching the entire Robinhood chain. Gonna make sure we find all the bangers as I believe that this chain will change MANY lives. ========= ⚠️ I'ʟʟ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ DM ʏᴏᴜ ꜰɪʀsᴛ |⚠️ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘ |

83💯20🔥15👍3👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @overdose_gems_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 151,784 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

D Man
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,628
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 105,077
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 626,839
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,198
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 192,956
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,586
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Lumia News
@lumia_news · 109,961
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,838
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 113,476
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · 119,043
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
中国密码鲸公司 🇨🇳🐳🚀🌖
@ChinapumpWXC · 110,605
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto King Call
@Crypto_KingCall · 104,517
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OverDose Gems Calls” (@overdose_gems_calls), 47,785 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overdose_gems_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.