Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋

Channel

Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋

@BCUSAReal

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

144,892subscribers

+3,049 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262300473
TypeChannel
Username@BCUSAReal
DescriptionHi! Here I share my thoughts on crypto and financial markets, and also provide daily analysis of BTC and other coins. P.S. Always use your own judgment. You are solely responsible for your actions. ADS contact : @the_undefeatedz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BCUSAReal

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@BCUSAReal/33282 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC@vip_signal/3997011 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC1.0043 minutes
@BCUSAReal/33479 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC@vip_signal/4006617 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC1.002 minutes
@BCUSAReal/33821 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC@vip_signal/4034928 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC1.0010 minutes
@BCUSAReal/34316 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 03:50 UTC@vip_signal/4069016 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC1.0014 minutes
@BCUSAReal/34596 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC@vip_signal/4104829 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC1.0072 seconds
@BCUSAReal/34858 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC@vip_signal/4136326 Oct 2026, 09:24 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vip_signal81 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (81–0)
@Therichtrader_Reborn32 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (32–0)
@Crypto_Expert_Traders6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.1 hoursthis entry (6–0)
@Barcode_Trade5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@wolfoftrading_support5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (5–0)
@AmericanBinanceOfficials5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0016 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 165 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

2 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

141,120148,805144,962.5144,8927 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +3,049. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139,967–149,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 22:01144,892-136
9 Nov 2026, 22:01145,028-85
8 Nov 2026, 16:49145,113-118
7 Nov 2026, 13:49145,231-109
6 Nov 2026, 12:59145,340-92
5 Nov 2026, 14:59145,432-91
4 Nov 2026, 16:31145,523-64
3 Nov 2026, 19:41145,587-80
2 Nov 2026, 22:35145,667-95
1 Nov 2026, 21:11145,762-244
31 Oct 2026, 19:16146,006-304
30 Oct 2026, 18:10146,310-373
29 Oct 2026, 15:06146,683-302
28 Oct 2026, 11:26146,985-148
27 Oct 2026, 09:05147,133-144
26 Oct 2026, 05:56147,277-80
25 Oct 2026, 07:27147,357-115
24 Oct 2026, 04:36147,472-106
23 Oct 2026, 08:04147,578-145
22 Oct 2026, 05:29147,723first reading

Engagement

1,463 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 208 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.67%
avg views ÷ 144,892 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,310
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.286%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 1,463 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held1,463 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total733,090
Reactions total1,875
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,800
Videos
≈38
Links
≈810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

15,684 reactions across 910 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59112740333530709868,52654.4%
🔥4,13926.4%
👍1,86111.9%
custom 54134502538839444531,1587.38%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 918 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,684 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
583
across the posts below
Posts paid on
136
of 999 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BCUSAReal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 138 posts held from the last 30 days (0.725%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Selling pressure is appearing gradually and consistently, in a step-like manner.

12 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Today, the price of Pearl on the Near chain halved, which created an arbitrage opportunity.... https://near.com/crypto/pearl

11 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈4,090 views14 reactions2 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🧙‍♂️ CRYPTO IS PAYING FOR ITS FRIENDSHIP WITH TRUMP Senate Democrats are digging into Trump’s crypto business. Senator Blumenthal wants documents from World Liberty Financial and Fight Fight Fight LLC by January 4, 2027. Binance and Tether got letters too, and those are companies the whole market runs on. Trump’s push for crypto helped us. Now his opponents hit him through crypto, and everyone takes the damage. F…

🔥14

11 Nov 2026, 03:20 UTC≈4,110 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍7🔥6

10 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC≈4,930 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

BTC < 80K, and people are becoming bearish and discouraged.

🔥14

10 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC≈5,380 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

$FHE Marketcap only ~$4M now . Low risk and significant profit potential ahead. Worth buying and holding🔥 $FHE = $LYN . 🌊

👍9🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,463 posts we hold for @BCUSAReal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@BCUSAReal edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 29 posts on @BCUSAReal as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 03:35 UTCAnonymous Poll617 voters

Market today ?

  1. Long 📈49%
  2. Short 📉54%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Oct 2026, 03:24 UTCAnonymous Poll1,910 voters approx.

Market today ?

  1. Long 📈57%
  2. Short 📉46%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Oct 2026, 07:21 UTCAnonymous Poll427 voters

What is your trading style?

  1. Scalp trade53%
  2. Swing trade52%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Sept 2026, 05:39 UTCAnonymous Poll722 voters

Market today ? 🧐

  1. Long 📈55%
  2. Short 📉47%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Sept 2026, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Market today ?

  1. Long 📈48%
  2. Short 📉55%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Sept 2026, 02:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,260 voters approx.

Market today ….?

  1. Long53%
  2. Short50%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 321,132
#1
The Rich Trader Reborn 🐋
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 24,339
#2
Bull Market Maker 🐋
@BullMarketMarker · 24,431 (as read 13 August 2026)
#3
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 92,959
#4
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
#5
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 246,899
#6
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,068
#7
Crypto TA King 🐋
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,339
#8
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 182,238
#9
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 162,498
#10
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 100,868
#11
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 308,245
#12
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,543
#13
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 71,553
#14
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 293,797
#15
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 100,332
#16
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 173,891
#17
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 198,761
#18
CRYPTO GEEK
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,007
#19
Crypto Safe Calls™
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 130,573
#20
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 94,769
#21
White Bullss ™
@White_Bullss · 47,465
#22
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 139,592
#23
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 136,591
#24
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 182,610
#25
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,622
#26
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 233,171
#27
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 42,631
#28
Whales_Pumps
@Whales_Pumps · 53,478
#29
WhalePump Reborn : Best signals! ( 100% Free )
@WhalePumpsReborn · 43,914 (as read 13 August 2026)
#30
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 25,795
#31
Rose VIP Signal 🌹
@RoseVipSignal · 18,426
#32
CRYPTO HUSTLE
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,621
#33
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,794
#34
Boom_Boom_Billionaires
@BBB_Signals · 38,797
#35
CPTrading
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,202
#36
King of Futures
@crypto_futures_king · 36,961
#37
Crypto Insiders Talk
@crypto_insiders · 164,628
#38
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,423,087
#39
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 12,712,250
#40
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 7,808,013
#41
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,745
#42
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 313,746
#43
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,776
#44
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · 74,221
#45
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,278,207
#46
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 296,310
#47
Rose 🌹
@rose · 84,958
#48
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 6,984,959
#49
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 126,226
#50
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,135,926
#51
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,198,525
#52
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 99,583
#53
Binance liquidations
@REKTbinance · 19,530
#54
Catapult Extreme
@catapult_extreme · 7,579,455
#55
Crypto Heaven®
@CryptoHeaven · 44,608
#56
Walt News (ex. Wallet)
@walt_news · 3,284,292
#57
SEED Updates
@seedupdates · 7,216,620
#58
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,206
#59
Gram of TON
@gram · 6,218,751
#60
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 36,682
#61
GOATS Channel
@realgoats_channel · 4,163,341
#62
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 141,903
#63
FOREX TALKS
@forextalksbudhil · 7,738
#64
HC CAPITAL | Channel
@HCCapital_Channel · 62,929
#65
Rich Kid Trading
@Richkidtradings · 110,264
#66
Delbert's Trading Team
@delbert_trading · 5,761
#67
Bitget Wallet Announcements
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,537,885
#68
Crypto India Haveli
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 56,863
#69
CRYPTO TALKS
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 84,462
#70
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,515
#71
Crypto Jargon
@cryptojargon69 · 35,727
#72
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 56,825
#73
Margin Broadcast | TradeCoinVN
@margintradingTCVN · 53,132
#74
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️
@cryptogg · 101,881
#75
Crypto Notes
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,388
#76
James Adrian | TRADING 🐋
@TraderAdrians · 3,308
#77
Crypto Mermaids
@CryptoMermaids · 32,160
#78
Tomket Lovers Channel
@tomketloversreborn · 78,981
#79
Bitcoin Expert India
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,650
#80
Whale Sniper
@WhaleSniper · 59,201
#81
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 19,576,556
#82
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,294,946
#83
Tomarket Announcement
@tomarket_ai · 5,875,745
#84
PushpendraSinghOfficial
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,142
#85
Crypto King Keyur
@CryptoKingKeyur · 593,570
#86
ThuanCapital
@ThuanCapital · 88,306
#87
Airdrop Finder
@airdropfind · 514,187
#88
Open4profit
@open4profit · 76,689
#89
Banana Announcement
@banana_update · 1,288,229
#90
HC Tradecoin | Channel
@hctradecoin_channel · 33,869
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Rich Trader Reborn 🐋
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 24,339
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
BULLSTAR - SIGNALS
@BULLSTAR1 · 78,359
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 321,132
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
King of Futures
@crypto_futures_king · 36,961
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
White Bullss ™
@White_Bullss · 47,465
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 71,553
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 94,769
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 92,959
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 92,352
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Insiders Talk
@crypto_insiders · 164,628
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Ash Crypto Community
@AshCryptoCommunity · 18,605
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 25,795
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Bitcoin Crypto Signals
@fortunetradersofficial · 26,250
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
Binance Spot & Futures Trading Signals
@Trading_Signals_Futures_Binance · 36,884
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 182,610
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 246,899
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Cryptology X
@cryptologyxsignals · 15,638
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Coach
@coach · 22,722
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Crypto Phoenix ₿
@CryptoPhoennix · 25,827
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
Dr. Crypto | Free Signals 👨🏻‍⚕️
@drcrypto_trading · 28,275
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 136,591
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals · 19,026
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Binance Signals TURKEY🎖🚀
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,097
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 264 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

x.com3 posts · 6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋” (@BCUSAReal), 144,892 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BCUSAReal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.