Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Iced's House of Degeneracy

Channel

Iced's House of Degeneracy

@houseofdegeneracy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,989subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819368322
TypeChannel
Username@houseofdegeneracy
DescriptionONLY accounts associated: @icedknife All others are SCAMS. PLAYS ARE HIGHLY RISKY BE VERY CAUTIOUS MANY COINS, NFTS, ASSETS WILL RUG. SOME WILL DO WELL. ape first research later. 30 IQ, 100% retard.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/houseofdegeneracy

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,95237,14337,047.57 August 2026 — 37,119 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,119 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,046 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,034 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,000 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,979 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,985 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,973 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,979 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,966 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,952 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,956 subscribers23 August 2026 — 36,958 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,143 subscribers26 August 2026 — 37,128 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,120 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,085 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,073 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,064 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,072 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,080 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,072 subscribers4 September 2026 — 37,070 subscribers7 September 2026 — 37,053 subscribers10 September 2026 — 37,017 subscribers12 September 2026 — 37,009 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,005 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,004 subscribers18 September 2026 — 36,984 subscribers1 October 2026 — 36,989 subscribers36,9897 August 20261 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 56 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,923–37,172 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 22:5536,989+5
18 Sept 2026, 09:3736,984-20
16 Sept 2026, 03:2137,004-1
14 Sept 2026, 08:5737,005-4
12 Sept 2026, 19:0037,009-8
10 Sept 2026, 22:0037,017-36
7 Sept 2026, 22:0137,053-17
4 Sept 2026, 19:4037,070-2
3 Sept 2026, 02:0537,072-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:2337,080+8
1 Sept 2026, 03:5437,072-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:4437,075+11
30 Aug 2026, 01:4337,064-9
29 Aug 2026, 03:1437,073-12
28 Aug 2026, 06:4437,085-35
27 Aug 2026, 09:2537,120-8
26 Aug 2026, 06:0337,128-15
25 Aug 2026, 03:0337,143+185
23 Aug 2026, 19:5736,958+2
22 Aug 2026, 05:3636,956first reading

Engagement

146 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.84%
avg views ÷ 36,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.554%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 146 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held146 (30 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total111,377
Reactions total590
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Oct 2026, 04:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,450
Videos
≈19
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,931 reactions across 140 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,06355.0%
🔥44423.0%
🍌1176.06%
🥰1025.28%
💯623.21%
👏583.00%
🍾331.71%
🫡281.45%
👌160.829%
🎉40.207%
🏆40.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 145 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @houseofdegeneracy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 146 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 22:44 UTC632 views5 reactionsread 2 October 2026

i think once the dust settles, buying dips on these coins will prove to be a great trade

❤2🔥2💯1

1 Oct 2026, 22:44 UTC642 views4 reactionsread 2 October 2026

Robinhood perps announce is pretty bad for hyperliquid and lighter, but long term i still think they're fine because the kyc barrier will always be a con to crypto natives

🔥2❤1💯1

1 Oct 2026, 22:31 UTC783 views8 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

SHIB tweeting $WOOF lmaooo https://x.com/shibtoken/status/2105775326395531662 0xA912C71c0e53701153cAd9ba73E9B7D854418eaE

💯3🍌2🔥2❤1

30 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,530 views15 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Some ETH mainnet coins have been moving pretty well. $WOOF paired to $SHIB is a pretty legendary combo and the first of it’s kind. It’s been ranging 1-2m last few days and i think it makes perfect sense to put in a bid. I see a lot of SHIB guys + the SHIB twitter interacting CA: 0xA912C71c0e53701153cAd9ba73E9B7D854418eaE Chart: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x0be16b24f634f1de1d529d44fc3e284462da11800613ceea662a…

🍌6🔥4❤3🥰2

28 Sept 2026, 23:16 UTC≈2,210 views27 reactionsread 2 October 2026

The onchain grind doesnt end until some final boss catalyst happens ie something like TRUMP lock in and keep trading

💯10❤8🔥8🍌1

27 Sept 2026, 21:19 UTC≈2,040 views38 reactions1 Starread 2 October 2026

Good afternoon gentlemen

❤20🔥10🍾7🍌1

26 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC≈2,610 views15 reactionsread 2 October 2026

unfortunately these guys are fucking retarded who makes good working tek and tweets the way they do. fucking retards. literal sub 70 iq humans. this could have been a 50m coin if they just put out normal updates like any other team instead they post a partnership tweet then delete it 10 minutes later just to follow it up with this garbage https://x.com/stonkblends/status/2103919333487567060?s=46

🍾8🍌7

26 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,270 views17 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

$CALI briefly touched 9m today as paid coins start to rev. This is the second biggest paid coin after e/acc and for good reason. Absolutely cooking. Elon Musk’s Moms dog

🍌10🔥4🥰2❤1

26 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTC≈3,520 views5 reactionsread 2 October 2026

i implore you to try the pumpfun app if you haven’t already https://pump.fun/join/icedknife

❤5

25 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,120 views17 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

I think $Stonkblend has all the potential to be #1 or #2 on stonkfuns launchpad. It pretty much adds ETF pairs + custom basket of stock rewards/pairings. So you can buy 1meme and it can reward like 10 different stocks. Dev announced 75% buybacks. I think it's being slept on. 250k mc CA: 2Ngvnnkwrwq5u4RYV5WYKJ2wiQoEkKaVCc4LuuhYSTNK

🔥13❤2🥰2

24 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC≈2,930 views18 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

tesla silicon valley twitter baiting an elon interaction lmaoooo $CALI

🔥10❤3🍌3🍾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @houseofdegeneracy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@houseofdegeneracy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,476
#1
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,289
#2
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 26,980
#3
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,671
#4
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 14,202
#5
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,856
#6
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,463
#7
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,096
#8
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,870
#9
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,212
#10
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
#11
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,864
#12
Pyro Trading Journal
@pyrotradingjournal · 16,966
#13
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
#14
Brainstorm Alphas
@BrainstormAlphas · 6,294
#15
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,723
#16
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,330
#17
based kook calls
@hellokook · 16,162
#18
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
#19
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,212
#20
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,693
#21
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,411
#22
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,260
#23
PRIME TRADES 🪐
@primegems · 18,934
#24
Prerich lobby by mememe 💸
@prerichlobby69 · 6,813
#25
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,688
#26
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,901
#27
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,050
#28
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,740
#29
Affu Calls
@affucalls · 7,064
#30
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 14,272
#31
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,562
#32
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse · 2,871
#33
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,412
#34
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,539
#35
Diary of Apes | α |
@diaryofapes · 4,654
#36
PipscallsDegens
@Pipscalldegens · 6,163
#37
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,492
#38
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,872
#39
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,330
#40
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 32,859
#41
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,664
#42
Cautious bull run enjoyers
@smolinsanity · 14,307
#43
Poké's Balls
@PokeCallsCrypto · 10,114
#44
The Casino
@thecasinoeye · 6,381
#45
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,686
#46
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,804
#47
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,361
#48
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
#49
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,200
#50
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,778
#51
FAST's PALACE
@fastspalace · 3,207
#52
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,984
#53
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,884
#54
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,453
#55
SHITTY CALLS BY POE (DON'T BUY)
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,881
#56
ferb's friends
@ferbsfriendz · 5,318
#57
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,140
#58
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 37,568
#59
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,455
#60
goodmans journal
@solgoodmancalls · 8,017
#61
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,331
#62
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,787
#63
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,117
#64
AJM Gems
@AJM1000x · 6,985
#65
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,988
#66
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,694
#67
Klutch Trades
@klutchtrades · 4,514
#68
Neo Calls
@NeoCallss · 17,483
#69
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,791
#70
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,870
#71
Reaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 15,286
#72
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,051
#73
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 33,065
#74
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,746
#75
Catolicc's Oil Money
@catolicc100x · 9,603
#76
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 81,728
#77
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 40,779
#78
Sapphire Call’s
@SapphireCalls · 12,394
#79
Wiza Moves
@wizamoves · 1,866
#80

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,476
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,671
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,212
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,870
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 47,657
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 26,980
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,688
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
joji innercircle - comeback arc
@jojiinnercircle · 19,770
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,373
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,106
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 32,859
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,212
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 27,956
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 27,778
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 29,109
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,723
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,693
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Eric Cryptomans Journal
@erics_calls · 31,296
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Meta caller
@metacaller · 42,192
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,573
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 32,542
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 103 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iced's House of Degeneracy” (@houseofdegeneracy), 36,989 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/houseofdegeneracy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.