Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jamie's CaveπŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’»

@jamiescave

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

13,614subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686794412
TypeChannel
Username@jamiescave
DescriptionChannel where i disclose all my plays , research and advice NFA. https://twitter.com/cryptojamie7 DM for enquires/marketing/advisory : @jamiewagmi1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jamiescave

Growth

13,61213,62713,619.56 August 2026 β€” 13,614 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 13,614 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 13,612 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 13,623 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 13,627 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 13,621 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 13,614 subscribers13,6146 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,610–13,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1213,614-7
11 Aug 2026, 02:4413,621-6
10 Aug 2026, 00:0213,627+4
9 Aug 2026, 00:5113,623+11
7 Aug 2026, 22:1113,612-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:2313,614no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:4713,614first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
32.1%
avg views Γ· 13,614 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,370
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held20 (9 July 2025 – 15 July 2026)
Views total8,740
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ1,290
Videos
β‰ˆ40
Links
β‰ˆ709

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,012 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀51450.8%
πŸ”₯25425.1%
🀣918.99%
πŸ‘252.47%
😭242.37%
🀝232.27%
😒161.58%
πŸ’―131.28%
πŸ‘90.889%
🌭80.791%
πŸ€ͺ70.692%
🐳60.593%
🫑40.395%
✍30.296%
🍌30.296%
😱30.296%
😁20.198%
❀‍πŸ”₯10.099%
πŸ†’10.099%
πŸ“10.099%
4 further kinds40.395%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 1,012reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 01:33 UTCβ‰ˆ4,260 views84 reactionsread 13 August 2026

27M -> 1.7B in 2 months bring back the good old days

❀50πŸ”₯13😭12πŸ‘5😒2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ“1

15 Jul 2026, 01:32 UTCβ‰ˆ4,480 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bear market is always deep PVP which is why i avoided shilling anything new this year Bad conditions seem to be coming to a close Good conditions are on the horizon https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/2077204571244335553?s=20

❀38πŸ”₯8😱3

9 Jun 2026, 11:32 UTCβ‰ˆ7,550 views117 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/KeetaNetwork/status/2064306199420391771?s=20 Very significant partnership for $KTA XRP 2.0 in the making

🀣71πŸ”₯20❀14😭12

19 Jan 2026, 13:43 UTCβ‰ˆ16,300 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/2013245667695604196?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg Value supercycle incoming Trenchers -> researchers

❀23πŸ”₯10🌭8✍3πŸ†’1

21 Oct 2025, 22:46 UTCβ‰ˆ24,300 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1980767406751400159?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg 200k -> 4.1m Volatility has been great this week Onto the next

πŸ”₯56❀13🫑4🀣1🀯1

21 Oct 2025, 14:03 UTCβ‰ˆ20,000 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1980635863534239760 You do not own enough $KTA

❀21πŸ”₯5πŸ’―4🍌3πŸ‘1

19 Oct 2025, 15:15 UTCβ‰ˆ17,400 views69 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1979929251114524891?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg Opening 30 spots Free

πŸ”₯48❀16πŸ‘4😁1

14 Oct 2025, 06:50 UTCβ‰ˆ16,000 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1977990319242133766?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg

❀28

10 Oct 2025, 21:45 UTCβ‰ˆ15,400 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026

This dump is literally a rug Don’t make any emotional decisions Hope everyone is okay

❀77😒14πŸ”₯7🀝6🀣6πŸ’―5

27 Sept 2025, 15:09 UTCβ‰ˆ16,500 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1971955064588706219?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg Thoughts on the perp dex meta, this is the best narrative degens have had in a long time Something that actually generates $ to make it sustainable instead of trusting random anon devs incentivised to steal all your $

❀25

21 Sept 2025, 18:40 UTCβ‰ˆ14,600 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1969827332798955697?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg Mainnet is in 3 days thought it would be good to do an updated thesis post Mainnet is just the beginning, this is where the real money comes in Road to 100B

❀30πŸ‘13πŸ”₯9πŸ‘3🀣3

6 Sept 2025, 05:25 UTCβ‰ˆ13,000 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/cryptojamie7/status/1964196611107508297?s=46&t=YQgvXL-K9Mp_iDPNYLPDLg Coinbase just listed $KTA Next leg starting

❀22πŸ”₯10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jamiescave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 404,102 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru Β· 627,120
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here β€” alongside 93 others β€” read 8 August 2026
Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub Β· 172,101
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 12 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates Β· 193,571
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here β€” alongside 81 others β€” read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œJamie's CaveπŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’»β€ (@jamiescave), 13,614 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jamiescave.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.