3 May 2024, 16:00 UTC≈199,000 views948 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Everything here will be deleted within 24h after posting, I will also make this TG private and join request only soon 👽
👍948
Channel
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,704subscribers
-174 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001330023892 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teammacnbtc |
| Description | Where winners are made. My Twitter: www.twitter.com/MacNBTC |
| Created | 10 December 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teammacnbtc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 33,704 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 33,724 | -20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 33,744 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 33,756 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 33,789 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 33,805 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 33,823 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 33,845 | -24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 33,869 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 33,878 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 33,878 | first reading |
Engagement
2 posts held, back to 10 December 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
948 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 948 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 948reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2018 to 3 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
10 Dec 2018, 11:34 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @teammacnbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 765,837 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 105,015
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
@investigations · 105,015
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
D Man
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,740
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,740
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,273
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,273
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
unfolded.
@unfolded · 118,843
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@unfolded · 118,843
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Coin Bureau
@CoinBureau · 119,214
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@CoinBureau · 119,214
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈” (@teammacnbtc), 33,704 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teammacnbtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.