Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹

@RoseSignalsPremium

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

98,505subscribers

+3,702 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001217702004
TypeChannel
Username@RoseSignalsPremium
Description🧧 All Rose Premium Signals for FREE here ! Enjoy ! 🌹 Feel free to share our channel with your friends 👇 Channel link 🔥 : https://t.me/RoseSignalsPremium
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RoseSignalsPremium

Growth

94,80398,59396,6986 August 2026 — 94,803 subscribers7 August 2026 — 98,593 subscribers8 August 2026 — 98,586 subscribers9 August 2026 — 98,574 subscribers10 August 2026 — 98,547 subscribers11 August 2026 — 98,541 subscribers12 August 2026 — 98,505 subscribers98,5056 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +3,702. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,235–99,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:1598,505-36
11 Aug 2026, 07:4798,541-6
10 Aug 2026, 09:3498,547-27
9 Aug 2026, 11:1198,574-12
8 Aug 2026, 13:4298,586-7
7 Aug 2026, 12:5898,593+3,790
6 Aug 2026, 23:0394,803first reading

Engagement

193 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.49%
avg views ÷ 98,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
193 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
193
of 193 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held193 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total664,060
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24,300
Videos
117
Links
391

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#CYS Add at orange if market gives a chance @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 12 August 2026

Normally legend comes when Rose talked less or posted something like "smallsize" or "highrisk" 😂 @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,420 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Legendary pumps - #RAVE started at April 2026 - #MYX started at August 2025 - #LAB started at April 2026 There were 6 Ushape pumps but legends has not came yet I believe next legend will appear at this month. @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

It's about 99999 failed setups as well. @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

What is next U shape coin this week ? @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

if you scan whole market at the moment, there are only 6 U-Shape Pumps (price pumping from bottom to ATH). Rose Army spotted 6/6 @RoseSignalsPremium

12 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈3,590 viewsread 12 August 2026

GAME PLAN for next 2 months. BTC top was at Oct 6th 2025 BTC bottom will be at Oct 6th 2026 We play shitcoins game until mid-sep later that, short bigcaps to pico botom at early Oct. @RoseSignalsPremium

Showing the 12 most recent of 193 posts we hold for @RoseSignalsPremium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 131,811 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 146,526
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 149,510
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 213,962
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
We take off (crypto trading)
@vip_signal · 171,103
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,120
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 304,563
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 328,205
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Wolfx Signals
@wolfxsignal_officials · 153,626
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 185,996
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 178,895
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,738
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 202,509
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 341,989
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 146,502
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 315,444
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 177,915
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,541
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 269,886
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 322,333
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@crypto_pumps_p · 202,578
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Wu Blockchain News
@wublockchainenglish · 254,073
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
TROON🔷محسن ترون
@TROON · 1,094,516
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹” (@RoseSignalsPremium), 98,505 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoseSignalsPremium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.