🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 187,027,740 $USDC (187,084,316 USD) transferred from Unknown Whale 1 to #Aave Details

Channel
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
304,257subscribers
-1,139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001309043988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whale_alert_io |
| Description | The most advanced #blockchain tracker and analytics system reporting large and interesting transactions as they happen. All data available through our API. |
| Created | 4 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whale_alert_io |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Whale Alert Official” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 304,257 | -210 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 304,467 | -96 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 304,563 | -116 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 304,679 | -116 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 304,795 | -110 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 304,905 | -127 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 305,032 | -95 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 305,127 | -114 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 305,241 | -127 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 305,368 | -28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 305,396 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 305,396 | first reading |
Engagement
155 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.42%
- avg views ÷ 304,257 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,350
- 155 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 155
- of 155 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (5 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,139,050 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5
- Links
- ≈102,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 187,000,000 $USDC (187,096,472 USD) transferred from #Aave to Unknown Whale 1 Details
📈 📈 📈 UBS increases Bitcoin ETF exposure 24-fold through call options and adds to direct IBIT holdings Read Analysis
📉 📉 📉 Crypto derivatives suffer record $19 billion liquidation cascade after tariff shock, with repeated leverage flushes continuing into 2026 Read Analysis
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 176,027,728 $USDC (176,067,246 USD) transferred from Unknown Whale 1 to #Aave Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 176,000,000 $USDC (176,158,399 USD) transferred from #Aave to Unknown Whale 1 Details
📈 📈 📈 Edelman Financial and Tudor Investment disclose sizable Bitcoin ETF holdings Read Analysis
💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 💵 250,000,000 $USDC (250,081,249 USD) minted at USDC Treasury Details
🚨 🚨 🚨 994 $BTC (62,609,888 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to #Coinbase Details
📉 📉 📉 Galaxy says Coldcard seed-recreation exploit has drained over 1,778 BTC and could push losses above $150 million Read Analysis
📉 📉 📉 Singapore warns fake LinkedIn crypto job offers and malicious coding tests helped scammers steal $11.8M Read Analysis
🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨 150,000,000 $USDT (149,805,000 USD) transferred from Tether Treasury to #Bitfinex Details
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @whale_alert_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,288 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bitcoinarchives · 1185 postsCrypto VIP CHANNEL
@Cryptovip_channel · 4514 postsGlobal Crypto Capital
@GCCteam · 894 postsWeb3 Bits
@theweb3explorer · 1463 postsWalk™
@walk_id · 43 postsElite Global Channel 🇮🇩
@beritacryptoupdate · 822 postsNMKAKDELA
@canfishseewater · 52 postsCrypto Whale Signals 🐋🐋🐋
@cryptowhalesignalschannel · 272 postsCryptoPulse
@kryptopulse · 152 postsBALANCE
@market_balance · 1,0362 postsپیشنهادات خرید
@pishnahadatekharid · 412 postsTHE CRYPT CABAL 💎
@THECRYPT38CABAL · 3122 postsTrading for dummies
@Trading_for_Dummie_s · 302 posts⟨ 𝑿 ⟩⟨ 𝟕𝟒𝟕 ⟩
@AK000747 · 1931 postAMADO'S CRYPTO GROUP
@amadoscryptogroup · 1,2621 postATR trading school
@atrtradingschool · 611 postCatatan Crypto
@Catatan_Crypto · 321 post𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨𝐁𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐎𝐆
@CryptoBull_OG · 6541 postCRYPTO ESSENTIAL
@CRYPTOESSENTIAL · 81 postCrypto Genius TA & Signal
@cryptogeniussignal · 401 postFOREX CRYPTO
@CRYPTOMADI · 1,3681 postCrypto Mania 🌈
@cryptomanialifetime · 181 postCryptoSignal
@CryptoSignal_Indonesia · 1461 post다비드의 코인수첩 시즌2 🚀
@DAVIDISSOGOOD · 1,3321 postEquity Market Exploits
@equityexploits · 991 postHalf Real Half Digital
@Half_Real_Half_Digital · 2,8621 postOmniriskIO
@omniriskio · 71 postPalace's Gems 🏛️
@PalaceGems · 281 postCRYPTO KING🔥
@realcryptoking99 · 101 postSUPER CRYPTO CALLS 🐳
@supercryptowhales · 71 postChannel Giàu Chậm by Richard
@TPTrading_Channel · 8,4341 postCS Group | Trading
@TradingCSGroup · 5,1821 postAM03.call’s
@trxcloudbots · 61 postWhaleX 🐳
@whalextrading · 1,1661 postگله گرگ
@wolf_herd · 451 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@stable_coin_printer · 1,16120 postsByttc
@byttc1 · 519 postscrypto alert
@Crypto_bot_alert · 1110 postsWizz 小时情报
@hourintel · 2,3277 posts📊 CryptoNews 24/7 Real-Time Updates
@kpbtcsignal · 7,2554 postsКРИПТОМАУЗ🇺🇦
@crypto_mouze · 6,8683 postsmoved
@BigComList · 11 postCrypto Club «Galaxy»
@gp_ru · 261 postHEXN.IO Channel
@hexnio · 2,107,0981 postПросто о крипте | блог криптоинвестора
@leonvest · 2,0801 postLUDOMAN.RW
@ludomaninform · 41 postВолодя летит на луну
@mwinvest · 6961 postPenerima AirDrop
@penerimaairdrop · 2621 postSignals Indicators
@signalsindicators · 2341 postLinkRadar | Discover Telegram Gems
@TheLinkRadar · 61 postтрейдинг с ебанцой
@trading_s_ebancoy · 2401 postWhale actions - Binance Spot Signal
@whales_action_binance · 2,4221 postXTREME Pump
@XtremePump · 3391 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,357#1
@whalebotalerts · 146,312#2
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,839#3
@WhaleSniper · 60,908#4
@cointelegraph · 341,276#5
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,273#6
@unfolded · 118,843#7
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 24,477#8
@next10xgem1 · 339,365#9
@cryptoquant_official · 55,478#10
@BybitLiquidations · 14,932#11
@WhaleBotRektd · 22,871#12
@thecryptoexpress · 269,289#13
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 341,235#14
@binancekillers · 311,855#15
@cointrendz_marginsniper · 8,612#16
@whalescryptovip · 213,517#17
@cointrendz · 21,634#18
@FishTheWhales · 8,022#19
@WhaleTracker · 17,474#20
@WatcherGuru · 626,953#21
@dogs · 7,481,221#22
@blumcrypto · 15,561,355#23
@binance_announcements · 3,638,151#24
@notcoin · 9,190,792#25
@ThuanCapital · 91,480#26
@news_crypto · 98,732#27
@RoseSignalsPremium · 98,332#28
@thebull_crypto · 178,571#29
@BCUSAReal · 141,120#30
@REKTbinance · 20,452#31
@crypto_hd · 133,152#32
@rose · 85,984#33
@bitcoin_price · 55,668#34
@catizenann · 3,787,301#35
@Cats_housewtf · 8,640,776#36
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 327,091#37
@wublockchainenglish · 252,173#38
@Onchain52Hz · 10,848#39
@cryptobullet · 68,382#40
@airdropfind · 556,620#41
@plane_D · 8,648#42
@Richkidtradings · 89,008#43
@Coin_Signals · 74,275#44
@BitMEXSniper · 13,057#45
@cryptoattack24 · 56,781#46
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 31,846#47
@trade001k · 108,460#48
@CoinBureau · 119,214#49
@margintradingTCVN · 57,228#50
@CoinSonarV2 · 26,841#51
@HCGemAlerts · 39,375#52
@ico_analytic · 57,853#53
@glassnode · 43,870#54
@Fivemincryptoann · 59,033#55
@namdaracademyy · 78,867#56
@NewsCenterChannel · 38,100#57
@alirezamehrabi_com · 115,179#58
@invest_zonaa · 965,285#59
@yoyodexhaber · 40,657#60
@mobydick_crypto · 11,207#61
@ggshot · 91,957#62
@layergg · 19,901#63
@CryptoKlondike · 60,519#64
@Fin_Watch · 31,520#65
@icodrops · 43,413#66
@Whalesguide · 201,758#67
@wiseadvicebysumit · 175,626#68
@A1Aofficial · 37,146#69
@tomketloversreborn · 82,827#70
@Nobitexmag · 149,974#71
@WallMonitor · 7,343#72
@arzdigitalb · 55,120#73
@TCGFORYOU · 76,926#74
@HCCapital_Channel · 66,549#75
@markettwits · 334,371#76
@amir_ramzali · 113,969#77
@hctradecoin_channel · 35,224#78
@tradecoinundergroundchannel · 72,182#79
@indocukong · 41,856#80
@vnwallstreet · 29,214#81
@nobitexmarket · 322,463#82
@ramzali_eco · 70,174#83
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 50,482#84
@TradeCoinChienLuoc · 41,693#85
@cloobmali · 107,685#86
@yoyowla · 87,117#87
@cryptobyalireza · 37,579#88
@Coin_Post · 294,656#89
@bricsnews · 152,776#90
@kopeechkav · 55,567#91
@mr_mozart · 130,871#92
@Trading_Camp · 40,727#93
@saillytradinggroup · 43,693#94
@slezisatoshi · 125,281#95
@pifagortrade · 85,770#96
@ramzali_sc · 124,287#97
@FinancialStreetVN · 45,592#98
@jaryane_eghtesad · 48,735#99
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@whalebotalerts · 146,312
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,357
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@CryptoCapoTG · 117,273
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@cointelegraph · 341,276
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@unfolded · 118,843
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@CoinMarketCapAnnouncements · 252,033
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@drops_analytics · 681,655
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@sniper · 132,622
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
@bitcoin · 188,097
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@binancekillers · 311,855
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@DeFimillion · 412,501
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@WatcherGuru · 626,953
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,260
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@whalescryptovip · 213,517
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
@crypto_miami · 504,630
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 August 2026
@RosePremiumm · 149,267
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 341,235
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@bitcoin_industry · 422,699
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@RoseSignalsPremium · 98,332
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@BitcoinBullets · 105,634
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 185,661
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@wublockchainenglish · 252,173
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 101,740
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@news_crypto · 98,732
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whale Alert” (@whale_alert_io), 304,257 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whale_alert_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.