Channel
@blockchainwhispersbaby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101,882subscribers
-534 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001394848551 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockchainwhispersbaby |
| Description | Brotherhood, loyalty and honesty... sharing lessons life taught me with you. Not financial advice. No support. For educational purposes only. |
| Created | 24 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockchainwhispersbaby |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 101,882 | -87 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 101,969 | -65 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 102,034 | -64 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 102,098 | -86 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 102,184 | -68 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 102,252 | -124 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 102,376 | -40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 102,416 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 74,962 |
| Reactions total | 1,342 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
828 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 723 | 87.3% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 6.88% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 1.09% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.966% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.725% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.604% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.483% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.242% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.242% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.121% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Great question. Networking. Quick answer: Is it easier for you to approach a chick that your friends and social circle brings to the table, already introducing you, hyping you, praising you... or cold approach a chick in random club you visit for the first time? That's your answer. Networks help. And they are very tied to your starting position, how outgoing you are and luck. One cheat way to the top is VALUE. …
❤51🔥5😍2
🛡️ Vigorous Praetor: greetings big bro D man! what do you think about networking? job or hobbies, etc? is it necessary in modern society? tbh for me sometimes its hard to do it from heart, not for value/reputation. maybe there is some books or experts to reconsider a view thanks! .
❤17
True bro.
❤26👌3
🛡️ Immortal Diomedes: Consciously, happily and appreciatively following you for years brother, you never disappoint! Much respect 🙌 .
❤32
The major champ here is you brother, for applying it. I am glad I could be a contribution to your more successful journey. Cheers! D Man
❤41🔥3
🛡️ Honored Darius: About a month ago, I told you that you had taken the blindfold off my eyes, and I still believe that’s true. I’ve been trading the same methodology for seven years, and I’ve learned that the market moves in cycles. There are periods when my setup performs exceptionally well, and others when it seems like nothing works. Instead of forcing trades or constantly changing my strategy, I’ve learned to p…
❤43🔥2🤝2
Notice, I do everything against-the-engagement. I end up posts (the ones you see in your feed) by answering to someone. Not 'catchy'. I hide my main post with your feedback and my natural rant. Because, D Man is followed consciously, happily and appreciatively. Not doom-scorlled into dopamine rush. I don't care if 100k people follow me or 1k or 100 Spartans. I care, that the real ones follow me. D Man
❤66🔥7🫡5🤝4
You're welcome my champ! D Man
❤27
🛡️ Unyielding Darius: Thank you D Man. .
❤19
Could be. I appreciate you. The more we share, the closer to understanding we are. D Man
❤27🔥3
I get your multiple feedback on the subject, as you see many of my followers also strive to figure out 'how life works'. I laughed at your praying for money because making a plan and working towards it is so much more fun than praying for it. When I have a good plan, in good environment, I am HAPPY to be able to do my part by working hard to make it happen. This is the closest to the secret I have discovered: hard…
❤30🙏6🔥4
🛡️ Valiant Mars: Dear brother D Man, I appreciate your knowledge and wisdom so much. I resonate with your ideas about life and have learnt a lot from you. The topic about manifesting is something I also spend years to understand. One thing I found out (about myself): I easily "manifested" my partner and girls before her, never seemed to struggle much about it. I always was told to be a "handsome boy" and am confiden…
🔥17❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @blockchainwhispersbaby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 305,238 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“D Man” (@blockchainwhispersbaby), 101,882 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockchainwhispersbaby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.