Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Matrix Journal πŸ“

@MatrixJournal

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

835subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631260716
TypeChannel
Username@MatrixJournal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MatrixJournal

Growth

835836835.57 Aug 2026, 04:33 β€” 836 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:46 β€” 836 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:06 β€” 835 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:337 Aug 2026, 21:06
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 835–836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 21:06835-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:46836no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:33836first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
2.28%
avg views Γ· 835 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held18 (13 September 2024 – 29 July 2026)
Views total19
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸŽ‰150.0%
πŸ•Š150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Rexa - The Future of Robinhood The future launchpad is coming to Robinhood. Trenches never looked so good. Launch. Trade. Easily. if u see this you’re early, founder last project over 200 Millions mcap. Robinhood Chain is getting number #1. Now it needs its legends πŸ‘€ Site: https://rexa.club X: https://x.com/rexadotclub Tg: https://t.me/RexaCLUBRH

8 Jan 2026, 09:25 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gm we gonna set up launch soon guys, Be patient. We ready for massive eth season Fuck we gonna dominant eth. Locked in ! https://t.me/+WsokjhsRnFAyNmZl

21 Jul 2025, 04:07 UTC194 viewsread 7 August 2026

Im loading up here #BABYGROK its coming https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x25f56a19d010644ee40e45c54c9f32635173a6a4

3 Jul 2025, 15:57 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026

Bought $MARU - even kabosu mama love him- followed by kabosumama https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xA510964722205DcEa1fBC828363e9bE16DBDbA5f

7 Jun 2025, 10:19 UTC313 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The 1st $TAP deployed on Ethereum, community-managed. The heir apparent to NEIRO and DOGE. We knows the winner https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6ecd26ee798f6b99373e2044b4c5f1141f73d068 https://t.me/TapCtoEth

30 Dec 2024, 16:31 UTC615 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x3b1F8439d508cC93B32c5B2258F63Ff7236394b9 Watching dip on toad Looks very good, big team behind

19 Dec 2024, 19:37 UTC524 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CryptoCapoTG

I'm buying the panic. This is part of the dip I was waiting for to deploy more capital on the way down. Currently 30% exposed to the market, mostly $ENA (avg. entry price $0.98) and $AIOZ (avg. entry price $1.00), but also a few other strong AI low caps that I'll share soon. Time will tell.

19 Dec 2024, 18:11 UTC478 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Over $200,000,000 liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru

19 Dec 2024, 17:51 UTC466 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

All comes down to what BTC does. Once BTC bottoms everything else will, Few pairs on radar while watching BTC for confluence. Including BERT Nothing in general will bounce for most cases till BTC bounces Memes rally hard but at same time pullback hard to which is relative to the rallies I want BTC to confirm before stepping in longs again.

2 Nov 2024, 02:53 UTC539 viewsread 7 August 2026

Wtf giveaway https://x.com/0xchitoshi/status/1852543887900111154?s=46

21 Oct 2024, 08:42 UTC506 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Sanin Buy! πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ πŸ”€ Spent $817.14 (0.3 ETH) πŸ”€ Got 96,501,247 SANIN πŸ‘€ Buyer / TX πŸͺ™ New Holder 🏷 Price $0.0000100 πŸ’Έ Market Cap $4,223,678 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending πŸ₯ˆ #2 On ETH Trending πŸ”₯

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MatrixJournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMatrix Journal πŸ“β€ (@MatrixJournal), 835 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MatrixJournal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.