Rexa - The Future of Robinhood The future launchpad is coming to Robinhood. Trenches never looked so good. Launch. Trade. Easily. if u see this youβre early, founder last project over 200 Millions mcap. Robinhood Chain is getting number #1. Now it needs its legends π Site: https://rexa.club X: https://x.com/rexadotclub Tg: https://t.me/RexaCLUBRH

Channel
Matrix Journal π
@MatrixJournal
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
835subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001631260716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MatrixJournal |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MatrixJournal |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 835 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 836 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 836 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 2.28%
- avg views Γ· 835 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (13 September 2024 β 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 19 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1 | 50.0% | |
| π | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Gm we gonna set up launch soon guys, Be patient. We ready for massive eth season Fuck we gonna dominant eth. Locked in ! https://t.me/+WsokjhsRnFAyNmZl
Im loading up here #BABYGROK its coming https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x25f56a19d010644ee40e45c54c9f32635173a6a4
Bought $MARU - even kabosu mama love him- followed by kabosumama https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xA510964722205DcEa1fBC828363e9bE16DBDbA5f
The 1st $TAP deployed on Ethereum, community-managed. The heir apparent to NEIRO and DOGE. We knows the winner https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6ecd26ee798f6b99373e2044b4c5f1141f73d068 https://t.me/TapCtoEth
https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x3b1F8439d508cC93B32c5B2258F63Ff7236394b9 Watching dip on toad Looks very good, big team behind
Sticker, posted without a caption
I'm buying the panic. This is part of the dip I was waiting for to deploy more capital on the way down. Currently 30% exposed to the market, mostly $ENA (avg. entry price $0.98) and $AIOZ (avg. entry price $1.00), but also a few other strong AI low caps that I'll share soon. Time will tell.
JUST IN: Over $200,000,000 liquidated from the cryptocurrency market in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru
All comes down to what BTC does. Once BTC bottoms everything else will, Few pairs on radar while watching BTC for confluence. Including BERT Nothing in general will bounce for most cases till BTC bounces Memes rally hard but at same time pullback hard to which is relative to the rallies I want BTC to confirm before stepping in longs again.
Wtf giveaway https://x.com/0xchitoshi/status/1852543887900111154?s=46
Sanin Buy! π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ π Spent $817.14 (0.3 ETH) π Got 96,501,247 SANIN π€ Buyer / TX πͺ New Holder π· Price $0.0000100 πΈ Market Cap $4,223,678 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending π₯ #2 On ETH Trending π₯
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MatrixJournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMatrix Journal πβ (@MatrixJournal), 835 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MatrixJournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.