Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brozinkers

Channel

Brozinkers

@brozinkers

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,804subscribers

-1,901 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715499315
TypeChannel
Username@brozinkers
Descriptionnothings financial advice, do what u want just dont blame me if u lose yet be silent when u win The old cleancallsbycrash username got taken by scammer, dont fall for the fake channels
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brozinkers

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

53,80455,70554,754.56 August 2026 — 55,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,680 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,616 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,589 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,545 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,480 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,453 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,406 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,343 subscribers17 August 2026 — 55,296 subscribers18 August 2026 — 55,273 subscribers19 August 2026 — 55,239 subscribers20 August 2026 — 55,205 subscribers22 August 2026 — 55,165 subscribers23 August 2026 — 55,092 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,032 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,976 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,953 subscribers28 August 2026 — 54,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,865 subscribers30 August 2026 — 54,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,777 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,732 subscribers2 September 2026 — 54,699 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,645 subscribers4 September 2026 — 54,574 subscribers7 September 2026 — 54,446 subscribers10 September 2026 — 54,319 subscribers12 September 2026 — 54,256 subscribers14 September 2026 — 54,186 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,130 subscribers18 September 2026 — 54,016 subscribers25 September 2026 — 53,804 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,901. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,519–55,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 07:3853,804-212
18 Sept 2026, 19:1954,016-114
16 Sept 2026, 09:3654,130-56
14 Sept 2026, 13:3854,186-70
12 Sept 2026, 22:2054,256-63
10 Sept 2026, 22:0054,319-127
7 Sept 2026, 22:1754,446-128
4 Sept 2026, 19:5554,574-71
3 Sept 2026, 02:2654,645-54
2 Sept 2026, 02:5354,699-33
1 Sept 2026, 05:3654,732-45
31 Aug 2026, 02:5454,777-50
30 Aug 2026, 01:3654,827-38
29 Aug 2026, 04:1654,865-40
28 Aug 2026, 04:4654,905-48
27 Aug 2026, 03:4654,953-23
26 Aug 2026, 05:1854,976-56
25 Aug 2026, 01:5455,032-60
23 Aug 2026, 12:1255,092-73
22 Aug 2026, 00:3755,165first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.63%
avg views ÷ 53,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,110
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held31 (4 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total16,420
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈811
Videos
≈40
Links
≈1,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,538 reactions across 31 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,53455.8%
💯55212.2%
🔥52711.6%
🏆2244.94%
❤‍🔥1563.44%
🤣1433.15%
👍962.12%
👀350.771%
😈340.749%
🤯270.595%
👏240.529%
🙏220.485%
🤝220.485%
😁200.441%
✍190.419%
😱160.353%
🫡160.353%
🍓150.331%
👌150.331%
😎90.198%
9 further kinds320.705%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,420 views50 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @dontbetthehouse

https://x.com/krakenlistings/status/2104964443566403740

❤28🔥16🏆6

29 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,470 views114 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @dontbetthehouse

First and only Wojak ever to be on Kraken and Binance US Pepe at 1.7B Wojak at 19M when market reprices OG memes wojak is gonna get bid hard and reprice vertically in relation to Pepe/Doge Memes are just in a very quiet time rn and not the main attraction in the market this second It's more things that are tokenizing and bringing traditional things on chain getting the money flow atm

❤65🔥22💯13👏10🏆4

17 Sept 2026, 17:28 UTC≈4,910 views144 reactionsread 30 September 2026

https://x.com/CrashiusClay69/status/2100637949507600703

❤86🔥31🤣16🏆7💯4

3 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC≈8,620 views110 reactionsread 30 September 2026

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2095589575573839881

❤66🤯18🔥17🤣7🏆2

22 Aug 2026, 01:18 UTC≈11,200 views213 reactionsread 30 September 2026

So easy to make money in memes if u pay attention

❤125💯31🔥23👍9😎9🍓5🏆5🦄2

22 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈10,600 views152 reactionsread 30 September 2026

But write something that actually shows them something huge for them And they scroll and don’t notice shit

💯87❤44😁9🤣8🍓3😈1

22 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈9,130 views133 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Bc people have little ant brains and comprehend that easily

🤣63❤41💯19👀4😈3👏2🍓1

22 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈8,800 views141 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Like “I am so bullish right now” Would get 1.5k likes

❤95💯26🤣14🤯3🍓2😈1

22 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC≈8,440 views110 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Tweets where u say something cheesy or 1 line

❤100😈6🔥3🍓1

22 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈8,170 views164 reactionsread 30 September 2026

It’s legitimately sad how many people go past this tweet about volume And won’t see it or pay attention at all

❤107💯25👍15🏆12🍓3😈2

22 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC≈7,770 views152 reactionsread 30 September 2026

https://x.com/crashiusclay69/status/2090970860219769017

❤101🔥34👍11🤝2😈2🍾1🤣1

26 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC≈11,400 views368 reactionsread 30 September 2026

I’m gonna do my part as always And I’m also gonna do the work of 100,000 guys If everyone does the work of themself, plus the work of 2 other guys at least That’s not an army of 100,000 That’s an army of 300,000+

🏆143❤116🔥45💯26❤‍🔥8🐳8🤣7👀5

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @brozinkers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
#1
Hopium Casino
@HopiumCasino · 14,368
#2
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
#3
Prints Printing Press
@printspress · 19,096
#4
DJ’s Casino😈
@Djplays · 11,330
#5
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 29,109
#6
Exy's Lab🧪🥼
@ExysLab · 25,804
#7
Cheatcoiner’s Playground
@cheatcoinerplayground · 9,892
#8
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,688
#9
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 37,828
#10
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 33,065
#11
666 🔥 Calls
@x666calls · 17,778
#12
Plz fade mustacho’s cooks 😈
@LittleMustachoCalls · 9,808
#13
Fomo’s Mojo Dojo Casa House
@fomomofosol · 14,562
#14
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,789
#15
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,870
#16
wuzie makes money
@wuziemakesmoney · 8,984
#17
Zero lightning calls ⚡️⚡️
@zerolightningcalls · 2,249
#18
Kanye's Greatest Hits
@KanyesGreatestHits · 5,330
#19
Lyx lucky room 777
@lyxluckyroom777 · 1,932
#20
Solshotta's Hitters
@solshotta · 4,625
#21
numero journey
@numer0ethgamble · 4,172
#22
Patty's Trap House
@pattystraphouse · 2,871
#23
Pwnlord’s Larp Kingdom
@pwnlord · 8,492
#24
KOBE'S CALLS
@KobesCalls · 17,946
#25
Robo Calls
@robogems · 16,921
#26
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 26,200
#27
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,906
#28
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,516
#29
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,453
#30
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,984
#31
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,686
#32
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,361
#33
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,212
#34
Levis Calls
@LevisAlpha · 47,657
#35
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,671
#36
Wasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 14,237
#37
Marcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,650
#38
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 47,200
#39
SpiderCrypto Trading Journal
@spidersjournal · 32,884
#40
Shmoos Journal ✍️
@shmooscasino · 30,096
#41
Solstice's Degens
@solsticedegens · 6,856
#42
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 81,728
#43
The Krypto King 👑
@thekryptokingofficial · 31,543
#44
numero's trading diary
@fakepumpsbynumer0 · 6,111
#45
SHITTY CALLS BY POE (DON'T BUY)
@SHITTYCALLZBYPOE · 10,881
#46
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,870
#47
🐳ihzans whaleschool🐳
@ihzanswhaleschool · 29,693
#48
Jamie's Cave👨🏻‍💻
@jamiescave · 13,455
#49
Xander's Trenches
@xanderstrenches · 11,117
#50
Maythous Calls
@maythouscalls · 35,723
#51
Iced's Inbred HQ
@inbredhq · 7,289
#52
Maythous Degens
@maythousdegens · 15,463
#53
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 40,779
#54
Cold Capital ❄️
@ColdCapital · 4,411
#55
wat is des
@watisdes · 30,055
#56
Insyder's Casino
@insydercasino · 13,834
#57
based kook calls
@hellokook · 16,162
#58
Dōgen Dojo🇯🇵
@dogendojo · 32,859
#59
Handsome Finance
@handsomertg · 11,232
#60
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,412
#61
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen · 36,178
#62
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble · 38,003
#63
Fomo’s Gambling Gays
@gamblinggays · 11,125
#64
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
#65
STEKI'S BASEDMENT 😈
@stekibasedment · 4,058
#66
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call · 80,140
#67
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls · 35,539
#68
Gems of Ra 💎👁‍🗨
@GemsofRa · 17,791
#69
Sonder Signals
@sondercalls · 10,004
#70
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,271
#71
Kobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 15,988
#72
Mrpunk Gamble
@Mrpunkgamble · 7,694
#73
Sage’s Degen Trenches
@sagextrenches · 4,643
#74
yelo's degen log
@yeloalfa · 10,787
#75
Profitierr
@profitierrr · 6,593
#76
Senzu Calls 🔱
@senzu_calls · 6,740
#77
Daniel McEvoy💰💎
@danscryptorants · 11,355
#78
Gake’s Bakes
@GakesBakes · 26,746
#79
Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 77,449
#80
Stuff im (Penn) buying
@Stuff_I_Ape · 5,331
#81
The Tribunal Court of Defi
@TribunalCourtofDefi · 5,901
#82
Duncan Plays 🧙‍♂️
@duncanplays · 15,295
#83
Sibel’s Plays (🚨Only Real Account. Don’t get Scammed)
@sibelplays · 9,695
#84
Aroa's Journal
@AroasJournal · 3,030
#85
MOVE TO NEW CHANNEL - PINNED LINK
@jojigambles · 7,662 (as read 23 August 2026)
#86
CTM Calls
@CryptoTalkManZone · 10,664
#87
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,355
#88
SOL TRENDING
@trendingssol · 138,165
#89

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 29,109
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 33,065
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Dior’s Alpha ‼️🚀
@Diorscabal · 23,870
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
Shmoo’s Calls
@shmooscalls · 37,828
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,688
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,696
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
World Liberty Financial
@defiant1s · 81,728
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 25,890
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
REDO - Resistance Dog Portal
@redotoken · 28,153
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
don’t bet the house
@dontbetthehouse · 26,200
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Klarck Alpha
@klarck_alpha · 36,892
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
HD’s Crypto Casino
@wallethuntersio · 24,154
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 September 2026
Cielo Announcements
@cieloannouncements · 44,476
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Profits Winning Ground
@ProfitsPlays · 25,789
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 27,315
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 September 2026
Mduz Calls
@mduzcalls · 26,471
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Wulf Calls
@wulfcryptocalls · 28,395
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 37,212
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Boblles Channel
@crypto_bobles · 48,677
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
J7’s - Trading Journal (笔记) 📝
@J7tradingjournal · 20,373
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
macnbtc's winner circle 🐺📈
@teammacnbtc · 32,872
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Caleb’s Degens
@calebsdegens · 32,542
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,361
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Qwerty's Quants
@QwertysQuants · 22,260
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 114 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brozinkers” (@brozinkers), 53,804 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brozinkers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.