Channel
@TraderKozz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,767subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440301404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TraderKozz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TraderKozz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 5,767 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 5,780 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 5,788 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 5,790 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 5,798 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 5,804 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 5,818 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 5,818 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
497 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 497 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 497reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 15 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As a heads up, Telegram has been running ads but I have no affiliation with any of them. Please don't click on any TG ads in here thinking they are an endorsement or something from me. Also, life has been crazy with the newborn and some traveling but will be ramping up the Telegram content again soon.
👾88
Very exciting GolfN announcement 🙂 https://x.com/GolfNApp/status/1865102745579012150
👾19
On a market front, not a ton of stuff to update on. Bitcoin just consolidating under 100k and the longer it chills under 100k I think the better the chances are that this leads to a significant breakout. Just a matter of staying patient and not getting chopped up until then. And in the meantime I'll be keeping an eye out for other opportunities and trading memes/alts https://www.tradingview.com/x/ZGy6B9es/
👾17
Meteora teased an upcoming launch and potentially hinted at an airdrop as well. Meteora is one of the biggest protocols on SOL and based on their tweet, there's already quite a bit of hype around this I'd keep an eye on the TG for updates. https://t.me/WEAREM3M3 https://x.com/MeteoraAG/status/1862134394586091974
👾2
Happy Thanksgiving everyone! Lot of things to be thankful for this year, the market is truly blessing us with lifechanging opportunities every single week. Stay focused, big few months ahead
👾40
$SOL update https://www.tradingview.com/x/ehBTQ7Cg/
👾7
if I had to guess, SOL is ranging before the next leg up. Price action looks solid and HTF structure looks phenomenal. If it does dip to like 190 or something I'd look to enter some lev longs https://www.tradingview.com/x/zD0WcJqs/
👾12
BONK went on an absolute RIPPER after that range setup lol and just made a new ATH https://www.tradingview.com/x/Jmu6DNHS/
👾2
Want to see fwog chop around a bit to build a little healthier of a base before the next leg up. Parabolic price action is fun but not always sustainable. Want to put in some nice support https://www.tradingview.com/x/ceFjdB7z/
👾5
FWOG is simply one of the best coins point blank period https://www.tradingview.com/x/hDo8z5LZ/
👾16
Also I just realized I didn't really post about Fwog in here but its one of the memes I have the most conviction in this cycle The art is so good and it combines everything people loved about NFT's and 1/1 art but turned into a memecoin. The community is great, the CTO team is incredibly qualified, and its just great vibes overall. I have no doubt it goes to billions this cycle
👾26
I've been insufferable about FWOG on twitter and just posting about it constantly. Lotta fwog whales are in EARL so I decided to grab a bag. Think its doing a nice 40% retest here and I like the meme. I think its a pretty unique meme, not a dog or a cat or a frog or anything, I actually have no clue what this mfer is but I think its funny and the holders have the slogan "earl has legs" which I think is catchy. http…
👾4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TraderKozz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TraderKoz TA” (@TraderKozz), 5,767 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TraderKozz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.