16 years ago today, the first Bitcoin block explorer went live. Thank you, Theymos!

Channel
Insider leak of the day
@Insider_leak_of_the_day
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,205subscribers
-176 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001206908698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Insider_leak_of_the_day |
| Description | Crypto is the epitome of a free world @Insider_leak_of_theday @Disclaimer_information @PaidPromotion_only @Insider_Private Channel owner:- @MrBybit |
| Created | 3 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Insider_leak_of_the_day |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:08 | 7,205 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:37 | 7,207 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 17:07 | 7,210 | -47 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 7,257 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 7,278 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 7,290 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 7,303 | -8 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:48 | 7,311 | -9 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 7,320 | -9 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 7,329 | -3 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 7,332 | -9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 7,341 | +5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 7,336 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 7,342 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 7,352 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 7,354 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 7,361 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 7,362 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 7,369 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 7,363 | first reading |
Engagement
231 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.833%
- avg views ÷ 7,205 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 60.0
- 118 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 118
- of 231 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 231 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,078 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 02:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈22,800
- Videos
- ≈80
- Links
- ≈5,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 118 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The global rate hike cycle is accelerating: ~45% of global central banks have raised interest rates over the last 3 months, the largest total in 3 years. This proportion has surged +40 percentage points since March. By comparison, between 2024 and March 2026, more central banks were cutting rates than raising them. Furthermore, global central banks have delivered 42 rate hikes over the last 6 months, the largest …
The global rate hike cycle is accelerating: ~45% of global central banks have raised interest rates over the last 3 months, the largest total in 3 years. This proportion has surged +40 percentage points since March. By comparison, between 2024 and March 2026, more central banks were cutting rates than raising them. Furthermore, global central banks have delivered 42 rate hikes over the last 6 months, the largest …
Hedge funds are getting hit hard by the AI selloff, per BLoombergL VARA ($20B): down 33% in October, after a 44% drop in July Arini ($22B): down 26% Atreides ($3.4B): down 9.5% Lone Pine ($20B): down 8.8% Tiger Global ($78B): down 8.5% Whale Rock ($13B): down 8% Engineers Gate ($5B): down 5.5%, cutting its stock-picking team Marshall Wace ($70B): down 5.4% D1 Capital ($40B): down 5% Samlyn ($7B): down 5%, dumping al…
64.35% of all Bitcoin hasn’t moved in over a year. A year ago it was 60.97%. Patience is the biggest advantage you can have.
🇬🇧 UK growth minister declares Britain will not slow down AI development despite growing backlash in the US.
Key Events This Week: 1. October CPI Inflation data - Tuesday 2. OPEC Monthly Report - Wednesday 3. Initial Jobless Claims data - Thursday 4. October Existing Home Sales data - Thursday 5. October PPI Inflation data - Friday 6. Total of 17 Fed Speaker Events This Week We expect another volatile week ahead.
Michael Saylor hints at another Bitcoin purchase by Strategy
Here's what to be ready for this week 👇 All Week: -Fed officials speaking Monday: -Strategy 8-K Tuesday: -US CPI inflation October Wednesday: -US banks and bond market closed for holiday Friday: -US PPI inflation October
The U.S. Treasury plans up to $95 BILLION in debt buybacks over the coming quarter. Bullish for Bitcoin!
Users Report Deposit Restrictions at OKX, Binance and Other Exchanges Following FinCEN Action Against MEXC Following the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issuance of a special measure order targeting MEXC Global, some community users reported that funds withdrawn from MEXC to centralized exchanges, including OKX, Binance, and Gate, were subjected to compliance reviews, held pending depos…
BREAKING: Berkshire Hathaway more than doubled its stock buybacks in Q3 2026, repurchasing $9.6 billion of its own shares. This brings total buybacks in 2026 to $14.4 billion, marking a sharp reversal after the company paused repurchases for nearly 22 months. Berkshire also revealed that it has been a net buyer of stocks in 2026, with net purchases hitting +$11.2 billion YTD. This compares to net stock sales of -$…
Showing the 12 most recent of 231 posts we hold for @Insider_leak_of_the_day. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@tigerpositions · 39 postsMemeDegenCryptoFamilyNewsChannel
@MemeDegenCryptoFamily · 78 postsBinance Killers Vip
@Binance_Killers_Vip · 31 postCoinFusionHub - Crypto TA
@CoinFusionHub · 111 postCrypto Bull Signal
@Crypto_Bull_Signal · 11 postInsider leak of the day
@Inslder_leak_of_the_day · 51 postKING CRYPTO
@KING_CRYPTO_PREMIUM · 31 postLeak Nhóm VIP
@leaknhomvip · 2311 postPentagonChannel_Vip
@PentagonChannel_Vip · 11 postRaticoin Club Free™
@Raticoin_Club_Free · 31 postCrypto Trading Premium Signal
@vipcryptotradingcall · 231 postWhale Cryptocurrency
@Whale_Cryptocurrency · 31 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@news_crypto · 99,667
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,704
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@cointrendz · 20,832
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
@cryptobullet · 72,463
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@kimoncrypto · 35,385
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@Coin_Signals · 71,655
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@Cryptocurrency_Inside · 41,419
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
@unfolded · 116,634
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@FinancialWorldUpdates · 19,826
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 September 2026
@bilbiamtengarsadinha · 112,710
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 6 September 2026
@JustTopico · 30,097
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,777
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@CryptoProUpdates · 33,798
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
@Bitcoin_Insights · 27,192
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
@CryptoWorldNews · 40,948
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptosignals · 19,056
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
@RasecTips · 26,622
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 September 2026
@marketfeed · 39,688
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@BK_btc_trading · 23,932
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,102
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
@blockchainwhispersbaby · 96,483
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@Therealdrprofit · 53,774
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
@cryptoquant_official · 55,498
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@CrypNuevoTATrades · 23,039
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Insider leak of the day” (@Insider_leak_of_the_day), 7,205 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Insider_leak_of_the_day.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.